Successes and costs of freedom of information, says MoJ

 
Sir Gus O'Donnell The out-going Cabinet Secretary Sir Gus O'Donnell

The outgoing Cabinet Secretary Sir Gus O'Donnell thinks freedom of information has gone too far in eroding a confidential "safe space" for ministerial policy discussions.

But this view doesn't seem to be universally shared within the civil service.

This is reinforced by a report issued today by the Ministry of Justice, which assesses how the Freedom of Information Act has been working in practice.

Views within public authorities on whether FOI has a damaging "chilling effect" on frank discussion and minuting of meetings appear to be very mixed, according to a study commissioned by the ministry.

Diverse

Some officials state that FOI has forced them to adopt "better record management" and internal communications are now "more formal and professional". Others interviewed report that internal messages have become "less detailed and informative".

This diverse picture fits with previous research conducted by University College, London, which similarly found both positive accounts of records being "more thorough and focused" and negative ones that they were becoming "less detailed and more anodyne". A mixed impression is also given by the latest UCL analysis of the impact of FOI on local councils.

This issue is just one point that quickly stands out from a lengthy and detailed document, which will need to be disgested at greater length.

'Cost'

The report also seeks to evaluate the performance of FOI against the objectives of openness, accountability, improved decision-making and public participation, as well as examining the administrative burden imposed on public authorities.

The MoJ refers to the "successes" of FOI, but says they "do not come without cost". It raises the balance between these two factors with the following element within its conclusions:

"The Government's commitment to transparency stands alongside its commitment to reduce regulatory burdens. A question worthy of consideration is whether the current FOIA regime strikes the right balance between those two objectives."

This is the first stage in the process of "post-legislative scrutiny" of the Freedom of Information Act about to be undertaken by the House of Commons Justice Committee. The committee will now consider the ministry's memorandum along with evidence from other interested parties, as it examines how well the law has been operating.

 
Martin Rosenbaum Article written by Martin Rosenbaum Martin Rosenbaum Freedom of information specialist

How the Civil Service objected to Kinnock's FOI plans

New documents reveal Whitehall officials objected to aspects of the freedom of information law that Neil Kinnock planned to introduce if Labour won the 1992 election.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 16.

    Strange how the dynamic changes when the watchers are being watched is it not?
    The fact is that governments have got away with murder in the past and been able to sweep any inconvenient details under the carpet.
    Not any more they are under surveillance like the rest of us.Sauce for the goose sauce for the gander
    MPs expenses last year I wonder what is going to crawl out of the woodwork next year?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 15.

    "Sir Gus O'Donnell thinks FOI has gone too far...". What a surprise. I once heard successive British government's practice of keeping everything secret stems from the days of the feudal court where decisions were arrived at by a combination of intrigue & scheming by a small number of enobled men. The public, or more properly peasants, were irrelevant - much as govts ever since would have it.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 14.

    my simple suggestion to the retiring sir Gus.{current terms i presume?}
    Get rid of all the in the pockets of government press. Make Private Eye the only national rag. At least then we should have reasonable freedom of information.
    Is the time ripe for another crack at Spitting Image?
    firkin

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 13.

    There are ways of frustrating the FOI laws and Francis Maude has been doing this for ages in the case of top city firms working in the heart of government, as reported by private eye. So why is there a need for more restrictions when all they have to do today is claim it will cost too much to get the facts.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 12.

    As much as it pains me to say it, this was one piece of legislation that labour got right. For me it should be expanded not contracted.

    Sir Gus reminds me of Sir Humphrey.

 

Comments 5 of 16

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.