~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~12~RS~)
More children to receive pupil premium, minister says
Total pupil premium funding for 2011-12 is £625m and is due to rise to £2.5bn by 2014-15
Up to half a million more children from disadvantaged backgrounds are to benefit from the pupil premium, the government is set to announce.
The premium of £488 per child goes to schools on top of their main funding.
At present it only applies to children currently receiving free school meals, but in future anyone who has been registered for free meals in the past six years will be eligible.
The children's minister said it would help schools tackle inequality.
Labour has accused the government of taking away support from low income families by cutting child benefit and freezing tax credits.
'Gulf in achievement'The pupil premium was a key plank of the Liberal Democrats' last general election manifesto, and was adopted by the Conservatives when they entered coalition.
The government said it was widening availability because research showed that children who had been eligible for free school meals at any point in their school career had consistently lower educational attainment than those who have never been eligible.
It also said secondary school pupils were less likely than those at primary level to be registered for free meals even when they were eligible, and those children would be picked up by the new approach.
“Start Quote
End Quote Sarah Teather Children's MinisterThousands of children will finally be getting the extra support they need to succeed”
Children's Minister Sarah Teather said: "In a fair society, it's the government's responsibility to close the gulf in achievement, where the poorest children are less likely to leave school with five good GCSEs than their less-deprived classmates.
"[The pupil premium] will help schools tackle the inequalities that have been a part of our state system for far too long. Thousands of children will finally be getting the extra support they need to succeed."
Ms Teather will also tell Parliament on Monday how much the pupil premium will rise to in 2012-13 and what the overall pot will be worth.
Total funding for the scheme in 2011-12 is £625m and is due to rise to £2.5bn a year by 2014-15.
Meanwhile, Schools Minister Nick Gibb is set to unveil recommendations for a new "master teacher qualification" to recognise "truly outstanding teachers".
The idea, which follows a review of existing teaching standards by Sally Coates, principal of Burlington Danes Academy in London, includes scrapping the current system for assessing experienced teachers.
Mr Gibb said: "The proposal has the potential to bring much greater simplicity and clarity to what is at present a complex and highly bureaucratic system of standards.
"It is a further step towards our ambition to elevate the status of the teaching profession and ensure the very best are recognised as key figures in the intellectual life of the country."
Commons votes to back gay marriage
Search for US tornado survivors
Smarter future
Light relief
Re-verse
Unlocking secrets
A leaf from nature's book 
Click
Comment number 97.
Lady Samantha12th December 2011 - 14:14
Don't blame teachers...badly behaved children cannot be removed from school. When I was Secondary teacher training, one class numbered 36 kids!! They were great but there was just me and them! Impossible to give the attention to each they rightly deserve. It is worse in primary school - classes should be 20 kids max, not 32 which was the number in my daughter's class, all with differing needs.
Link to this (Comment number 97)
Comment number 89.
BluesBerry12th December 2011 - 13:31
Some poorer children do very well - with parental support, enthusiasm, & attitude that a good education will promote a decent job down the line. Some richer children do very poorly because they are born with a golden spoon in their mouths which seems to prevent clear thinking & promote the attitude that a good job is a matter of heritage.
Link to this (Comment number 89)
Comment number 88.
milvusvestal12th December 2011 - 13:26
I fail to see any link between a child's ability to learn, and where he or she sits in socio-economic terms. I attended a Secondary Modern school at a time when all youngsters, not just a few, came from really poor families that had nothing like the benefits lavished on them today. I left school with 7 GCEs, and sat none of these easy, multiple-choice, papers that are currently in use.
Link to this (Comment number 88)
Comment number 65.
Secretbanker12th December 2011 - 12:32
Coming from a poor background will not necessarily make you thick. Coming form parents that do not value an education or learning will and would rather have the latest TV or trainers than a book in the house will !! That goes for risk and poor alike. That has always been an problem and always will be.
Link to this (Comment number 65)
Comment number 58.
robynnaomismith12th December 2011 - 12:17
What a load of rubbish - I come from a single parent family of 5, and my mother has always worked, often juggling more than one job, but we were never rolling in it. But the reason why I was a 'straight A student' is not down to what I was eating, but that my mother actually gave a damn about how I was brought up, and was always there to support me, whether at school or in other areas!
Link to this (Comment number 58)
Comments 5 of 9