Minister Francis Maude urges '15-minute strike'

Protesters hold placards in Nottingham city centre during a one day national strike against pension changes and funding cuts to the public sector, June 2011. The government wants to avoid more strikes like those in June 2011

The government has suggested public sector workers planning to strike over pension changes stage a "token" walkout lasting just 15 minutes.

With pension negotiations ongoing, Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude suggested "token action" on 30 November meant workers could avoid losing pay.

The union Unison called the government proposal a "PR gimmick".

The strike must be held within 28 days of being called, or unions face having to re-ballot members at major expense.

'Token action'

Mr Maude accepted this rule meant some unions felt the strikes must be held on 30 November because if they were delayed the unions would lose their mandate for industrial action.

He told the BBC a "token action" would get their point across without costing them any pay.

This 15-minute walkout idea is a lot to do with winning the hearts and minds of the wider public in this battle over public sector pensions.

The government wants to appear to be the conciliatory and reasonable negotiator with unions and sway wavering voters who may feel as if it was bullying them.

The 'token strike' notion comes a week after the coalition made a revised offer to unions that no-one within 10 years of retirement would have to work longer to get their full pension.

These carrots from ministers come with a big stick, however.

If public sector unions press ahead with their 'mega strike' at the end of the month, then the government may look hard at reforming strike legislation. That could mean at least half of union members would have to have cast their ballots before a strike became legitimate. Only a quarter of public sector union members voted for the forthcoming walkout.

Mr Maude said: "I do not know of any public sector employer which would not say, that's a token strike, it's going through the motions, it's preserving the union's position.

"You know, I'm trying to help them out of this ridiculous position they've got themselves into, where they've jumped the gun and gone to ballot before the time was remotely appropriate."

Brian Strutton, national officer of the GMB union, said: "Maude's proposal for a 15-minute strike is a daft idea. We are asking members to vote for a strike not a tea break."

But Mr Maude said a whole day of industrial action, amid ongoing negotiations and after just a quarter of the unions' members had taken part in ballots, would strengthen the case for law changes to demand minimum turnouts for valid strike votes.

"The turnouts have been very low and, you know, I've got to say to the union leaders, if they actually call a strike based on a ballot where only just more than a quarter of those balloted actually bothered to vote at all then the pressure to change the law to set some kind of turnout threshold will really become very, very hard to resist," added Mr Maude.

The negotiations between the government and the unions are technically only relevant for England and Wales, with Scotland and Northern Ireland's administrations in separate but aligned talks with unions, said the BBC's business correspondent Joe Lynam.

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said: "If Francis Maude had genuinely wanted this idea to be taken seriously I would have expected him to have raised it directly with the unions rather than play it as a PR gambit in a press interview.

"The way to resolve this dispute and avoid industrial action is to make real progress and acceptable offers in the negotiations."

A Unison spokesman said the government could not guarantee that 9,000 public sector employers would not dock workers' pay.

"It's a load of PR gimmicks to make people think unions are being unreasonable," the spokesman said.

"We're talking about a legitimate ballot. Our members voted a certain way and how that strike goes ahead is not a matter for Francis Maude to dictate."

'Very complex'

The TUC has called a national day of action over pension changes on 30 November and more than three million workers from a range of unions could take part.

But Sir Steve Bullock of the Local Government Association urged local government employees not to take part in any strike.

He said: "All of the public sector pension schemes are very complex and it is entirely possible that you do something quickly which you can live to regret later.

"I would urge everyone who's involved to take the time to give us more opportunity to work up a sustainable scheme."


More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 566.

    As a teacher, we are constantly having more and more demands placed on us. The new OFSTED framework sets an impossible standard. How many hours are we expected to work each week?

    And we're supposed to work like this until we're 68 as well as dealing with unruly teenagers

    There is no point paying into a pension on these terms. Even seeing 68 is a pipe dream with this workload.

  • rate this

    Comment number 460.

    I will not be on strike. I am a carer for the elderly and disabled and do not care to think about what would happen to them if I did.

    My sympathy is with the strikers. Pensions is only symbolic.

    I cycle to work past a new housing development. To earn - gross - enough money to buy a house with a bedroom each for me and my children would take me 127 years.

    Inequality has gone too far.

  • rate this

    Comment number 380.

    For me to have a pension as good as a public sector worker on the same income I would have to contribute 30% of my salary into a pension scheme compared to the 6.4% a teacher contributes. So, I as a taxpayer and private sector worker who now earns on average less than the public sector workers, has to make up the shortfall!! Some people just don't understand when they have it good!

  • rate this

    Comment number 375.

    I chose a career in public service because I believe in it passionately. I have paid tens of thousands of pounds into my pension in the belief that I was being reponsible and providing for my future instead of relying on the state. I am not allowed to remove this money but the rules are being changed against my will. Of course I'm angry -
    I'd like someone to explain to me what I did wrong?

  • rate this

    Comment number 363.

    It is important that people realise this isn't about spoiled public sector workers whining about losing a privilege. There are many care/health workers who will face a grim old age when they have devoted their careers to looking after people themselves. Social care already has low pay, long hours and few perks. We fight a losing battle with budgets, neglect and a society that doesn't care.


Comments 5 of 13


More Politics stories



Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.