UK could give £40bn to the IMF, Danny Alexander says

 

Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander: Britain 'could put £40bn into IMF'

Related Stories

The UK could potentially give up to £40bn to the IMF to help the global economy, Treasury Chief Secretary Danny Alexander has said.

That contribution would be split across two funds, but both would be guarantees not actual cash transfers.

David Cameron has said the UK will give more to the IMF, but the money must not support a eurozone bailout.

Labour said the IMF could not be a substitute for the European Central Bank "recognising its responsibility".

In July, MPs voted to raise the UK's International Monetary Fund quota from £10.7bn to £20.1bn. That contribution is topped up with bilateral loan arrangements, known as new arrangements to borrow (NAB).

The BBC's political correspondent Ross Hawkins says that as the quota goes up, the loans are due to come down, to a total combined amount of £29.4bn.

However, he says the government could choose to leave the loan untouched, thereby allowing it to contribute up to £40bn without a further vote in Parliament.

'Promise to pay'

The UK currently contributes £4.9bn, of which £3.3bn is from the quota and the rest from NAB.

Mr Alexander told the BBC's Andrew Marr programme that MPs had already agreed to both elements of the UK contribution.

He said the £40bn commitment would be a "contingent liability".

Start Quote

The IMF was a British invention - that's why we should be supporting it”

End Quote Danny Alexander Chief Secretary to the Treasury

"In other words, we're not actually handing over cash, it is a promise to pay, to back up the IMF's lending if things go wrong," he said.

"It's worth pointing out that no government has ever lost money in terms of resources made available to the IMF.

"The IMF was a British invention - that's why we should be supporting it. That's why it was so wrong for the Labour Party back in July to vote against make additional resources available to the IMF."

Asked whether he was happy that additional UK contributions would go to Greece, he replied: "I am, in fact that's already been agreed."

The prime minister has said any additional resources for the IMF must be available to all countries, not just those in the eurozone.

And he insisted he was "not asking British taxpayers to contribute to the IMF because European taxpayers aren't doing enough".

For Labour, shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander said the European Central Bank (ECB) should be the lender of last resort for the eurozone and "does need to be delivering more fire power".

"We have always supported the IMF as the United Kingdom, but the question is, what is that money used for?" he told the BBC.

"We don't want to see a situation where the IMF's recapitalisation becomes a pretext or an excuse for the ECB not recognising its responsibility."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -37

    Comment number 138.

    It appears everyone is losing site of the real issue at hand. It is in everyone's self interest to avoid a collapse of the EU. A collapse would lead to a collapse in the global financial system worse than what we experienced in 2008 and a global recession affecting UK and ever other country in the world. No doubt that bankers bonuses should be curtailed etc but let's not lose site of the issue

  • rate this
    +90

    Comment number 133.

    One thing is for sure this just further demonstrates how totally out of control the bulk of politicians are here and around the world.
    They are capable off running up huge debts, giving away vast sums of money and involving countries in conflicts without any fear of the voting public being able to stop to such behaviour, democracy is a very poor joke.

  • rate this
    -37

    Comment number 57.

    Am I missing something, there seems to be allot of 'we need the money at home sentiment'

    I always believed this money was given but had to be paid back WITH INTEREST so if we give 40bn and get back 50bn for example is that not good business. Any extra money we get back could go toward the infrastructure programs recently announced,

  • rate this
    -13

    Comment number 39.

    People - read the article.

    NO MONEY HAS BEEN HANDED OVER.

    Its gurantees to LOAN money if the IMF needs in the future.

    If they did draw the LOAN, most likely we would borrow the money from the markets at low rates, and lend to IMF at higher rates. Its one of the few things the UK still does well.

    Shame on those twisting the facts to score poltical points.

  • rate this
    +9

    Comment number 34.

    Is there a single person on this planet who understands any of this? Most of us struggle to understand our own domestic finances. I don't believe Danny Alexander or any other MP knows what on earth is going on, it's all just a stab in the dark, and these figures of money are beyond imagination.

 

Comments 5 of 8

 

More UK Politics stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on BBC News

  • Reading e-bookA novel idea?

    How US libraries are responding to the change from printed books to digital publishing

BBC © 2013 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.