Information law scrutiny means worries on both sides

Lord McNally Lord McNally says all parties will have the chance to make their case

The Freedom of Information Act is about to go through a process known in Whitehall jargon as 'post-legislative scrutiny' or, in other words, examining how it is working in practice.

This procedure will take some time but could have a crucial impact on the future development of freedom of information in the UK. It seems to have left some FOI campaigners worried about how the Act might be scaled back and some public bodies and private companies worried about how it may be further extended.

At a seminar yesterday the justice minister Tom McNally said some government colleagues were not keen on the Act being subject to this, but he had pushed it through. He insisted it will give both proponents and critics of FOI the chance to make their case.

The Ministry of Justice is working on a report it plans to submit before Christmas to the Commons Justice Committee, which will then consider what other evidence to take.

'Tension within government'

The MoJ has also commissioned some research into the financial cost of FOI for public authorities, but this is not expected to be completed until the new year.

The trade-off between costs and benefits will clearly be one important element in the scrutiny process. The deputy information commissioner Graham Smith told the same seminar that he was worried that FOI work might suffer disproportionately in an era of public spending cuts, a fear that many FOI officers share.

Lord McNally acknowledged there was "a tension within government" on how much to extend freedom of information to private sector bodies, although he added that the split was not along party lines.

'Goldmine of intrusion'

He justified the decision to give many communications with the Royal Family an absolute exemption from FOI, while emphasizing it was a cabinet decision

"It's one of those rough and ready decisions where you try to marry political reality with principle", he said. "Leaving the monarchy within the FOI Act would be a goldmine of intrusion for journalists."

Lord McNally insisted that his personal enthusiasm for FOI had not been undermined by his experiences as a minister, although he recounted an anecdote that suggested some of his colleagues might be following Tony Blair down the path of disillusion.

When he recently informed a meeting of fellow Lib Dem ministers that he had just extended FOI to a number of additional bodies such as the Association of Chief Police Officers, they replied "What did you want to do that for?" But perhaps this was just a joke.

Martin Rosenbaum Article written by Martin Rosenbaum Martin Rosenbaum Freedom of information specialist

10 things we found out because of Freedom of Information

The Freedom of Information Act came in 10 years ago. It's led to the unearthing of a trove of facts.

Read full article


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    Why is that I find this piece like 1984. In London, the Airstrip One capital city, Oceania's 4 govt ministries are in pyramids - fa├žades of which display the Party's three slogans. The ministries' names are antonymous doublethink to their true functions: e.g. the Ministry of Truth is concerned with lies.
    FOI often seems more concerned with info cover-up, black-out than revelation of truth.

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    I believe that WikiLeaks/Julian Assange tapped a deep need to know. If we can't KNOW through FOI, we are laying the ground for more Wikileaks-type disclosures. Average person knows that information gets spun, manipulated and MISINFORMED. This is not right; there is a need to know; A RIGHT TO KNOW. If there occurs embarrassment, whose fault is that?

  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    There's room for topics that should be off limits - like the Royal Family - but these topics should be fully listed & justified. Unlike the privacy due to the Royal Family, there are too many topics hiding behind "security" issues and/or that are received by requester with more black-outs than material. Personally, I think UK needs to reconsider, perhaps reinvent its FOI.



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.