Labour conference: What Balls isn't sorry about

 
Ed Balls playing football with journalists Balls' side lost 3-2 to the team of political journalists

To see Ed Balls on the football pitch is to see the shadow chancellor as most people do see him - determined, aggressive and almost obsessively competitive.

All the more surprising then to hear him on the Today programme this morning saying sorry, not once but twice.

"The banking crisis was a disaster. All around the world the banks behaved irresponsibly, but regulation wasn't tough enough. We were part of that. I'm sorry for that mistake, I deeply, deeply regret it... What we failed around the world to see was the scale of those risks. I'm sorry about that."

Having sounded abject about Labour's failure to regulate the banks, he then added:

"It's also the case we made some mistakes in other areas - of course we didn't spend every pound of public money well."

Listen hard, though, and you will have noticed what he was not apologising for - spending too much public money before the banking crisis.

There will be no apology for that because, not only is he not sorry about it, he doesn't believe it to have been the case and is also determined not to give his enemies the sound bite they crave.

Indeed, the Labour leadership have come up with a sound bite of their own on spending - "Building schools and hospitals did not create the deficit."

Banks' debts

That is the context for today's promises of spending discipline.

Ed Balls will promise that, as chancellor, he'd have "tough fiscal rules" but he won't say what they'd be (much more significant is his concession that they would be judged independently and not by him as they were when he was last in the Treasury).

He will say that Labour cannot reverse every cut or tax rise (to claim otherwise would be absurd).

He will back the reform of public-sector pensions (though not the increased contributions the government is demanding).

He will pledge to use the money raised by selling off the government's bank shares for paying down debt (an announcement designed to turn up the heat on the coalition who dream of using the money to pay for share giveaways or tax cuts).

Ed Balls didn't, and won't, say sorry for spending too much money when Labour was in government because he isn't.

Shadow chancellor Ed Balls calls for a boost to growth amid "the most dangerous time in the world economy in my lifetime"

What's more, he believes that Labour's economic credibility will be restored not by admitting what the party got wrong in the past but by being seen to be right about the future.

He believes that the country may be about to realise that the biggest economic problem it faces is lack of growth, not the deficit.

He is determined to present himself as the man with the plan to put that right.

Tellingly he accused the prime minister and the chancellor of suffering from "false consciousness" - a Marxist concept meaning that people are unable to see things as they really are.

That is the battle now in British politics - not who is sorry but who has the right diagnosis about why we're in the mess we're in.

PS. On the radio I quoted what David Miliband would have said in his first leader's speech if he, and not his brother, had been elected.

The Guardian got a leak of the speech which said that "step one" in recovering public trust over the economy was "to recognise what is obvious: that we did not abolish the business cycle. We should never have claimed it. You can't in a market economy. And public spending plans cannot depend on it. Nor can you write your own fiscal rules, and then be judge and jury for how they are calculated and when they are met."

Balls says he agrees with every word.

Update: Here is my report for the News at Ten on Ed Balls' speech.

Nick Robinson at the Labour Party conference in Liverpool

 
Nick Robinson Article written by Nick Robinson Nick Robinson Political editor

Osborne - Benefit freeze and 'Google tax'

Chancellor George Osborne aims to put Labour on the spot with twin pack announcement on benefits and tax.

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 269.

    andy 268

    No, I'm not fussed about the figures for particular cases. Just the principle I'm doing. What a person/sector contributes is: Wealth Created MINUS Gross Remuneration ADD BACK Tax Paid.

    It's good stuff: Superior to, less simplistic than, the noddy notion (which I keep hearing) that if one pays a lot of tax one is per se a net contributor.

    Tax is only one term in the formula, see.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 268.

    267 saga, even you must realise how pathetic that argument is.

    Your argument is that if you like a profession you ascribe a value to 'wealth created' higher than the net salary and if you don't like it you ascribe a lower value.

    Tumbleweed weak.

    Your fish in this barrel are slow, overweight and a bit thick. The piscean equivalent of Lefty11.

    There's no point shooting them any more

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 267.

    andy 265

    Well let's say our Head Doc creates 500k wealth in a year; hard to quantify (being service sector) but it's the generic principle we're doing, remember, so don't get bogged down in measurement techniques.

    Now then, Contribution = Wealth Created - Net Pay

    Our magic formula:

    Tells us that if she's on less than 500k net she's a contributor; and if on more than that, he's a drain.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 266.

    #256 Andy

    Is the missing word 'tax advisor'?

    OK, two words I know, but I claim poetic licence.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 265.

    264 You dig a hole for yourself, until it's barrel shaped, line it with wood, fill it with water and stock it with slow moving fish.

    How on your parameters does a pyschiatrist create wealth above his post tax salary? And if you're going to reply on the 'wellbeing' of his patients, you should see the happy smiling faces of my clients after I've let them keep more of what they've earned.

 

Comments 5 of 269

 

Features

  • Shiny bootsMarching orders

    Where does the phrase 'boots on the ground' come from?


  • Almaz cleaning floorAlmaz's prison

    Beaten and raped - the story of an African servant in Saudi Arabia


  • Train drawn by Jonathan Backhouse, 1825The first trainspotter

    Did this drawing mark the start of a misunderstood hobby?


  • MarijuanaHigh tech

    The start-ups hoping to transform the marijuana industry


  • Child eating ice creamTooth top tips

    Experts on ways to encourage children to look after their teeth


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.