Pensions: Local Government Group reveals new plan

 
Striking women from Unison with placards Several unions are holding votes on staging a "day of action" on 30 November

The government could save £900m a year from public sector pensions without raising workers' contributions for two years, a lobbying group has argued.

The Local Government Group has written to the Communities Secretary Eric Pickles with its suggestions, which he says he is "considering carefully".

It says employees could either pay more in - starting in two years' time - to keep their benefits, or pay what they do now and get less when they retire.

But unions have dismissed the plan.

Public sector trade unions have already said they will go ahead with ballots for mass strike action on 30 November over pensions, after talks with ministers failed to reach a breakthrough.

But that was on the basis that millions of workers would have to pay more from next April while they were still experiencing a pay freeze.

'Careful consideration'

The latest proposal, which could affect two million workers, claims to bring the £900m in savings the government is looking to make by 2014-15 without employees opting out of the pension scheme.

In the letter the group states that its proposal "delivers the required level of savings, other than wholly through an increase in employee contributions, minimises the impact on the lower-paid and offers choice to individuals".

The proposals include an increase in the normal pension age from 65 to 66 from April 2014 which, the group claims, would save £300m a year. The remaining £600m comes from an increase in contribution rates with protection for the lower-paid, it says.

But for employees who were not willing or able to contribute more, there would be the option of accepting a reduction in their pension benefits.

No employee would face a rise in contributions for at least two years.

Analysis

This plan could create problems for some of the main trades unions which represent public sector staff including Unison, the GMB and Unite.

Last week they announced plans to ballot members on strike action amid concerns that the government would force through increases in pension contributions.

But if workers no longer face an immediate rise in contributions, will they be prepared to go on strike?

The proposals could also create problems for Eric Pickles. His department is due to publish its own proposals on pension reform in the coming weeks.

Would it risk a row with the Tory-led Local Government Group by ignoring its plans and perhaps seeking savings in the scheme in years one and two?

The Department for Communities and Local Government now has to decide whether to adopt the latest proposal or launch its own proposals for pension changes at the end of the month.

'Short-term tax'

A spokesman said these suggestions were a valid contribution to solving the public pension problem.

"This is a genuine consultation to which we are committed in order to try and agree a way forward with the unions and employers," he said.

"Public service pensions will still be among the very best, with a guaranteed pension, but we must ensure that they remain affordable in the future and deliver better value for the taxpayer."

In a statement, Unison said it could not "sign up to these plans, which are proposed to raise nothing more than a £900m 'tax' on local government pension scheme members for the government in the short term".

The GMB said there were "significant problems" with the proposals and that the government did not look set to change its "hardline stance".

On Thursday, a TUC-led delegation met Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander and Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude in the latest round of talks on pensions, but no agreement was reached.

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber told the BBC there had been no "dramatic change", with the two sides still "a long way apart", but promised there would be further talks.

"Unions will continue to step up their efforts with the ballots of their members and planning of industrial action," he added.

The Local Government Group says it works with local authorities, regional employers and other bodies to create solutions on pay, pensions and employment contracts.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 516.

    Them and Us is never a good place to be. The government and unions need to take this important issue back to the table and come up with a fair, agreed, long-term solution that is jointly announced without spin.

    The amount of misinformation out and about on this topic is sad, unhelpful and ultimately completely divisive.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 502.

    People keep on about the public sector pensions. Nothing is certain and there have been many redundancies. Also, no help with moving house on moving posts; no bonus for excellent performance - ever; lower pay overall and average public sector pensions are lower than those in the private sector. When you can't get people to work in the public sector due to the changes then people may listen!

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 484.

    The public sector should have excellent pensions, as long as the recipients pay for it and do not expect someone in the private sector to work until they are 70 to subsidise it.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 472.

    work as an electrician for local council , pay rise 2009 nothing, pay rise 2010 nothing, pay rise 2011 nothing and 2% reduction in pay and now they want another 3.5% to my pension total from pay 41% see you on the picket line.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 468.

    The biggest gripe private sector workers have isn't so much the size of a public sector worker's pension, but the absolute certainty of it. For the vast majority in the private sector, they have absolutely no idea what pension they'll get - all they do know is that annuity rates drop year by year, it seems no matter how much you put aside, your annual pension seems to go down faster.

 

Comments 5 of 12

 

More Business stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.