Viewpoint: Why the class struggle is not dead

Workers leave a factory in 1956 Class stereotypes were more defined in the 1950s and 60s when the way people dressed gave away their background

Related Stories

Left-wing commentator Polly Toynbee, presenter of BBC Radio 4's The Class Ceiling, gives her take on whether the class struggle is dead in the UK.

Class is dead and deference has gone the way of difference in dress, while the young all speak the same estuary or mockney. Apart from a thin platinum layer of the mega-rich and a silt of dysfunctional fallers, aren't we a classless society these days?

That's the convenient myth promoted by all parties since John Major proclaimed "the classless society" and Tony Blair declared "the class war is over".

Start Quote

Class is still everywhere, as unavoidable as knowing the difference in background between a child called Waynetta and one called Anastasia”

End Quote

Politicians seeking votes from high, middle and low sell a vision of a modern country where nearly everyone is "middle" nowadays.

With nine out of 10 MPs graduates and the fading of trade unionism, the voice of working class interests is rarely heard.

A BritainThinks poll finds only 24% call themselves working class - they say it not with pride but define it as "poor" and "struggling" in low-paid work. And 71% call themselves middle class (none admitted being upper class).

So have we become more classless? Dig a little deeper and class still hurts.

In making our series The Class Ceiling, we asked everyone from vox pops in the street to experts, politicians and academics the same question.

Find out more

Polly Toynbee
  • Polly Toynbee presents The Class Ceiling on Radio 4
  • The two part series starts at 09:00 on Thursday 1 September 2011

Had they felt the painful jagged edge of class? Everyone had a story to tell.

A welder told of sitting in work clothes with his kids in a first-class carriage when a posh passenger summoned the conductor to check his ticket.

A politician at Cambridge was embarrassed by thinking a dinner engagement meant lunchtime.

An academic from a working-class family keeps the letter inviting him to an Oxford interview to check "you are appropriate in dress, manners and writing".

A working-class girl was floored by what to do with an avocado pear.

Class is still everywhere, as unavoidable as knowing the difference in background between a child called Waynetta and one called Anastasia.

Those two girls' futures will diverge too. The chances of them changing places in life are quite remote, with the "class ceiling" fixed more firmly than a generation ago.

'Brain research'

The post-war years saw a surge of upward class mobility with a great increase in white-collar and middle managerial jobs, pulling up many with few qualifications.

A two-thirds working-class society turned two-thirds middle class, less via education than the changing labour market.

But that social progress has stopped; a study comparing the fate of children born in 1958 with those born in 1970 shows the later group more sealed in the social class of their birth.

Sutton Trust research shows children's achievement in Britain is linked more closely to their parents' status than in most developed countries.

School pupils take exams School may do little to change the future for youngsters if their class trajectory is set before they arrive

Only 21% of children from the lowest fifth of incomes get five good GCSEs compared with 75% from the richest fifth.

School does relatively little to change class trajectory, which is all but set well before they arrive.

Latest brain research shows how much the first year of life shapes future ability, determined by love, language, empathy and intellectual stimulation - or the lack of it.

All parties urge the importance of early years, yet we spend least on the youngest.

All parties avoid the inconvenient fact raised by Oxford's John Goldthorpe - what goes up must come down. If the lower classes rise, then some from higher classes must fall.

Room at the top is limited, as are top university places, with little prospect of another 1960s-style surge in good jobs - as many recent graduates are finding.

Money is not everything but it is a pretty close match for class. And in the past 30 years, the income gap has widened.

GDP doubled since 1978, but only the top 10% saw incomes grow at or above that rate, twice as fast as the median and four times faster than the bottom 10%.

As Universities Minister David Willetts has honestly acknowledged: "Western societies with less mobility are the ones with less equality too."

When the income gap is wide, few cross the class divide, so remedies may lie less in schools than in the society they reflect.

As epidemiologist Richard Wilkinson tells us: "Boosting social mobility without addressing income inequality is like trying to diet without worrying about calories."

Part One of The Class Ceiling can be heard on BBC Radio 4 at 09:00 on Thursday 1 September 2011. A shortened version of the programme will be broadcast at 21.30 and the whole programme can be heard after on BBC iPlayer


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 263.

    Oh, I get it, if we call things by different names then they don't exist any more.
    The last real shift came with the Industrial revolution when those from non-aristrocrical backgrounds could challange the status of the blood born elite.
    I gather that these days, those who own a widescreen TV or iPhone are considered middle class.... err sorry, middle income earners.....

  • rate this

    Comment number 262.

    Capitalism is a class-based society which can only operate for the benefit of the minority who own and control productive resources, as rich individuals or through private corporations or the state. This is the reason for the failure of all reformists politicians and governments in all countries.Capitalism just cannot be reformed to work in the interests of workers and their families.

  • rate this

    Comment number 261.

    Polly is right, today its about a fully integrated society living on a small island cheek by jowl. The media and entertainment and what passes for culture in this country has levelled the playing field to those who watch with money and those who watch without, yes there are elite schools etc but the head of the civil service is from a relatively ordinary background, division is still important

  • rate this

    Comment number 260.

    Class is alive and kicking in this country and does anyone seriously suggest that someone like Cameron a Bullington bully (or any of of his "mates") care or want to do anything or anything about the wage and education gap.

    Of course Not they will all hide behind Non-policy such as the crass and laughable "Big Society" designed specifically to widen any gaps that already exist.

  • rate this

    Comment number 259.

    The British Class (Caste) system is alive and kicking, it's not just about the stereotypical chavs it's much wider than that. I spent ten years in the civil service I was quite shocked how un-meritocratic and class based it still is. I was surprised how many second generation Civil Servants I came across, and how the very dim but well connected got on: The same is true of our political class.


Comments 5 of 263


More Politics stories



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.