E-petitions urge MPs to debate return of death penalty

 

Sir George Young: "This is part of a strategy of making the Commons more relevant"

Related Stories

The first "e-petitions" - which allow the public to prompt parliamentary debates if they get enough support - have been published by the government.

The return of the death penalty heads the list of demands, with dozens of separate campaigns calling for it.

However a petition opposing its return was the most popular one six hours after the site launched.

Other suggestions include keeping all Formula One races on terrestrial TV, leaving the EU and a lower voting age.

Petitions gaining more than 100,000 signatures could lead to a full debate in the House of Commons.

Ministers have warned MPs not to "ignore" the public's suggestions.

More than 40 of the first 200 or so petitions published called for the return of capital punishment, the most popular attracting more than 1,000 supporters by 1800 BST.

But the most popular petition was one opposed to the return of the death penalty, which had gained more than 2,700 signatures.

Several petitions call for all Formula One races to be shown live on terrestrial TV, following the announcement last week that the BBC will be sharing coverage with Sky Sports.

The most popular gained more than 1,000 signatories by 1800 BST.

Raised threshold?

One petition recommends the televising of court proceedings and another that the price of alcohol be increased.

One demands that prisoners' diets be restricted to bread and water, as in the "good old days", another that bodybuilding should be encouraged to improve the nation's health.

Paul Staines, who writes the Guido Fawkes blog, is campaigning for the re-introduction of the death penalty

Any petition signed by more than 100,000 UK citizens goes to the cross-party Commons backbench business committee, which will decide whether it is worthy of debate.

This does not mean any parliamentary bills will be tabled as a result, simply that the matter will be discussed.

Leader of the House of Commons, Sir George Young, told BBC News the threshold for debating an e-petition could be raised if too many reached the signatures target.

He said: "We do want to monitor it to see if we've got the threshold either too high or too low.

"This is a new initiative and we've set 100,000 because we think that's roughly the right target, but if lots and lots of petitions sail through that barrier then we may need to see if it should be higher.

"If none of them are able to reach that target then we may need to lower it."

'Crazy ideas'

Since launching on Thursday, the e-petitions site has experienced problems, with about 1,000 people a minute logging on.

A government spokesman said: "We apologise for any inconvenience experienced as people try to access e-petitions - this is a result of greater-than-expected demand."

Neil Durkin from Amnesty International on debating the death penalty: "It is a relic of the past."

Any petition deemed to be libellous, offensive, duplicates of existing open petitions or not related to government will be rejected.

Moderators will also block any that concern honours and appointments.

But Labour have said the petitions could lead to debates on "crazy ideas".

The system replaces the previous e-petitions pages on the Downing Street website, set up when Tony Blair was PM.

The most popular of these, with more than 1.8 million people in support, opposed road pricing.

More than 70,000 backed the one-word suggestion that Gordon Brown should "resign".

And almost 50,000 signed up to the idea that TV presenter Jeremy Clarkson should become prime minister.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -58

    Comment number 1333.


    The argument against the death penalty based on the past few cases of inaccurate conclusions are based on emotion and not realism. The exception should not determine the rule, and now with improved technology there is no real area of doubt.

    Serious repeat offenders are a danger to society and should not be supported to live by the state in jails or let out into the public again to cause harm.

  • rate this
    +38

    Comment number 1308.

    Mistakes happen. Miscarriages of justice do occur and I suspect that if you asked the petitioners whether they's be willing to be wrongly convicted and sentenced to death there may be fewer people signing the petition. In addition, the State has a duty for justice - not revenge which is what the death sentence is.

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 890.

    I dont agree with a death penalty, but it is our democratic right to have a debate on the subject. If there is public support for a debate and vote in parliment then our MP's should listen to what we want and then give it to us. I think rotting in a jail for the rest of a persons life is a better punishment, but if the majority want different, who am i to argue. In a democracy the majority rules.

  • rate this
    +82

    Comment number 783.

    The e-petition site currently measures 'quantity of visitors who voice support' for a petition. This system is highly susceptible to marketing tides.

    One way to better reflect the balance of public opinion would be to place a 'sign counter-petition' option alongside the 'sign petition' option.

    E-petition is an interesting concept for democracy, but is in its infancy... and teething.

  • rate this
    +46

    Comment number 776.

    Having the death penalty gives several 'unintended' consequences:
    - people are not going to confess to a crime which has the possibility of a death sentence
    - jurors are less likely to find someone guilty of a crime which has the possibility of a death sentence

    Even '100%' evidence is not 100%. Unless someone actually commits the crime in front of the jury, the evidence could have been altered

 

Comments 5 of 14

 

More Politics stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.