Let workers jump council housing queue - Ed Miliband
Mr Miliband said Labour would seek to address the shortage of social housing
People who work or volunteer should get priority on council house waiting lists, Labour leader Ed Miliband says.
In a speech on future policy, he said they should be able to jump the queue ahead of benefits claimants.
A similar scheme operates in Manchester and Mr Miliband said he was aiming to reward those who "give something back".
The Tories accused the party of a U-turn but former Labour minister Frank Field said it was setting out a new "position for the next election".
In his speech Mr Miliband said he was outlining his vision on "fairness".
He said: "One area where people's sense of fairness is under threat is social housing.
"There is a terrible shortage of social housing in this country.
"It will be one of the key tests of the next Labour government that we address this issue. But we also need to do so in a way that commands public support and respect.
"Need is, and will remain, a crucial test of who gets a house."
He went on to cite the Manchester example, where people who volunteer or who work or have been good tenants in the past are given priority in council housing allocation.
"This approach means that rather than looking solely at need, priority is also given to those who contribute - who give something back," Mr Miliband said.
"It's fairer and it also encourages the kind of responsible behaviour which makes our communities stronger.
"It is not about punishing people. It is about rewarding people who do the right thing in their communities."
Employment Minister Chris Grayling said Labour was responsible for the state of the benefits system, which was currently being reformed by the coalition.
"Labour created a welfare system where work didn't pay, where families were sometimes better off apart and where average earners paid for benefits claimants to live in houses they could never afford themselves," he said.
But Mr Field said Mr Miliband's comments represented a "huge break with the New Labour values which somehow endlessly talked about the responsibilities of the poor but never much enforced them".
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~43~RS~)


PM's 'family champion' steps down
Obama apology for Koran burnings
La vida simple
Render unto Caesar
Race to the bottom
Fight for freedom
Crossing borders
Fast Track
Comment number 136.
Denice Spratt14th June 2011 - 10:35
This country ius obsessed with the home ownership route unlike in Europe where most rent but there rents are affordable. To counter the high rents we need council housing but doing voluntary work should not be a criteria to getting a home need should be. Not everyone in a council property is unemployed many just dont earn enough to get on the property ladder
Link to this (Comment number 136)
Comment number 106.
steve14th June 2011 - 9:27
I think Ed is on the right lines I would go further and say those who are Key Workers (Police Officers Nurses Street Cleaners etc) and their families should be at the top of the list. As happens in many European cities. Courtesy of the Cameron cuts in wages a large percentage of these people can not afford to buy or rent privately, nationality of the individuals concerned is irrelevant..
Link to this (Comment number 106)
Comment number 98.
LeftieAgitator14th June 2011 - 8:54
Council housing began as a solution to the problem of providing decent housing at an affordable rent for the working poor.
We have a housing crisis precisely because of the political decision to leave housing provision to the market.
Some of the proposed changes seem driven by vindictiveness, most are primarily concerned with saving money. Rent Controls are idealogically unacceptable.
Link to this (Comment number 98)
Comment number 82.
Total Mass Retain14th June 2011 - 7:40
Council houses should not be for life. As an individual's circumstances change then if they cannot afford to buy or rent privately, then as their children leave home then the parents should downsize to a smaller house or a flat. No family should be allowed to have bigger than a 4 bedroom house (semi) irrespective of how many children they have. Should they be able to buy they should be made to.
Link to this (Comment number 82)
Comment number 72.
Cobbett_Rides_Again14th June 2011 - 6:57
Given that there are a great many billionaires palaces up and down the country, if we are even going to pretend to be even a slightly civilised country, there must be enough reasonable quality, truly affordable housing for all? If not, we urgently need to look at whether we can ever house our present ever increasing population - and if we can't, we need to decide how to reduce it.
Link to this (Comment number 72)
Comments 5 of 9