Police Federation: Officers hit from all sides by cuts

Police officers at the Royal Wedding The Police Federation represents rank and file officers in England and Wales

Related Stories

Police officers feel they are being "hit from all sides" by spending cuts, the Police Federation has said.

Its chairman, Paul McKeever, said proposed changes could push their terms and conditions "back decades".

And he said a survey of officers showed most believed cutting police numbers would have an impact on crime levels.

Home Secretary Theresa May, who will address the body on Wednesday, told the BBC ministers were helping cut police bureaucracy and backroom spending.

The Police Federation, which represents all police constables, sergeants and inspectors and starts its conference next week, has published its own survey of 42,000 police officers in England and Wales ahead of Mrs May's speech.

It showed 98% of respondents believed morale was falling amid proposed changes to pay and conditions and job cuts.

'Don't destroy it'

The federation said 85% of respondents felt cutting police numbers would have an impact on crime levels.

Mr McKeever said: "Let's improve policing, not destroy it. The government must listen to these views from the front line and give the public and the police the opportunity to shape a police service that is appropriate for the future and able to deliver what is expected of it."

He said the Police Federation accepted that policing must "play its part" in public sector cuts - but said the government should "have the courage of their convictions and establish a royal commission on policing".

The coalition's Spending Review cut central government funding to police in England and Wales by 20% over five years.

Start Quote

People talk a lot about police numbers, as if police numbers are the holy grail. But, actually what matters is what those police are doing”

End Quote Theresa May Home Secretary

Some forces will be less affected than others because of the proportion of their budget raised through council tax.

The chief inspector of constabulary (HMIC) warned earlier this year that some forces face a "big challenge" to make cuts without losing frontline officers.

The Association of Chief Police Officers has estimated that 28,000 police jobs will go over the next four years - 12,000 front-line officers and 16,000 civilian staff.

And a review of police pay and conditions has recommended a range of allowances and special payments be scrapped to save £485m over three years.

On Sunday Mrs May told BBC One's Andrew Marr Show that the findings of the Tom Winsor review were going through the police negotiating process.

But she said when pay made up 80% of police expenditure, and cuts were being made to tackle the deficit, it was "right to look at pay, terms and conditions".

Asked repeatedly whether she accepted Acpo's estimate that 12,000 officers' jobs would go, she said it was up to chief constables to decide how to structure their staff.

But she said the government was helping forces cut costs by reducing bureaucracy to save "man hours" and by helping them with back room costs like IT procurement.

"People talk a lot about police numbers, as if police numbers are the holy grail. But, actually what matters is what those police are doing. It's about how those police are deployed," she told the BBC.

"We want police officers to be crime fighters, not filling in forms."

'In denial'

But her Labour shadow, Yvette Cooper, said she was "in denial" about job cuts.

"It is her own 20% front-loaded cuts to the police that are responsible for 12,500 police officers and thousands more police staff being lost across the country.

"It is her responsibility that thousands of experienced officers are being forced to retire when they want to stay protecting the public and it is her responsibility that these forced retirements cost the taxpayer more not less."

A Home Office spokesman said the government's priority was dealing with the budget deficit and as the police spent £14bn a year of public money, they had to "make their fair share of the savings".


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 54.

    Its a complete joke. Front line services ARE been hit. I work for West Yorkshire police and officers are now having to a lot more admin tasks, such as record their own crimes on the system, which means they are back in the office doing that! Thats not keeping them on the streets!

  • rate this

    Comment number 36.

    I work with police forces all over the world and most are facing budgetary pressure. What's different is that most are finding new, innovative ways of working for the future. In New York after 9/11, NYPD faced the loss of thousands of officers but, with new technology in conjunction with zero tolerance, crime actually dropped by over 36% over the next 9 years

  • rate this

    Comment number 25.

    I am more worried that yet again we have a major service being tinkered with by the state without any sense of agreement about what the taxpayer really wants from it. People blather on about bobby on the beat and paperwork, riots and weddings etc but no-one seems to actually define what we really want to pay for. How can we judge proposed change without objectives?

  • rate this

    Comment number 21.

    Worried about the cuts in numbers?

    Well, - yes - but not half as worried as I am about this daft notion of elected Police Chiefs!

  • rate this

    Comment number 17.

    On average it takes eight hours to arrest someone and process the paperwork even for the most minor offences of public order. Unless these cuts also cut the legal bureacracy then to deny crime will rise as a consequence of these cuts is an insult to public intelligence!


Comments 5 of 6


More Politics stories



Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.