Parliament could become wedding reception venue

 
Houses of Parliament Catering facilities could be opened up to the public when the Commons is not sitting

The Palace of Westminster could host wedding receptions under plans to cut Parliament's subsidised catering bill.

The Commons Administration Committee has suggested even the historic Westminster Hall could be hired out for private functions at £25,000 a time.

Dining areas including the Terrace alongside the River Thames may also be opened to the public.

They are among proposals aimed at halving the £5.7m annual loss made by the catering operation at Westminster.

Security question

The cross-party committee of MPs said that healthier lifestyles and stricter working practices had reduced formal lunching and left Parliament's four main dining rooms underoccupied.

Westminster Hall

Westminster Hall

Take a 3D tour of the hall

Although steps have been taken to cut losses, including prices rises last year to raise an extra £1.27m, the committee said it was reasonable to maintain some subsidy for the 13,000 people working at Westminster, given Parliament's irregular hours and long recesses.

The MPs said it was "neither feasible nor desirable" to allow members of the public access to facilities when the House was sitting.

But their report added: "We are, however, not opposed in principle, and so long as any concerns raised by the Serjeant at Arms about security can be overcome, to opening the Strangers' and other facilities to the public on non-sitting days, including weekends and recesses, if all costs can be covered and the service offered profitably.

"Again, so long as a security concern is dealt with, we believe that allowing public access to the Terrace Pavilion for an afternoon tea service for those who have taken tours would raise revenue for the House and contribute in a minor way to the strategic goal of promoting public knowledge and understanding of the work and the role of Parliament through the provision of information and access."

Gunpowder plot

Opening up the facilities to the public would need the approval of the House of Commons, House of Lords and the Queen.

Another committee headed by the Speaker would have to decide whether to share these facilities with outsiders.

Westminster Hall hosted the trials of Charles I and the Gunpowder Plot conspirators, and the lying in state of monarchs and former prime ministers William Gladstone and Sir Winston Churchill.

 

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 58.

    My Council ran a subsidised canteen for staff. Gradually, the subsidy decreased and the canteen closed to save money, as it was 'wrong to use council tax to subsidise meals for public sector workers'. If the subsidised bars and restaurants make a loss, close them. The MPs can get meals outside or bring in packed lunches like the rest of us. Win, win.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 28.

    13,000 people? Four restaurants? I think maybe Parliament ought to do what it's preaching to everyone else, and try cutting costs. By my calculation, they are employing about 20 people for every single MP. I can't imagine a private company having such a huge overhead, and it seems symptomatic of the whole public-sector mindset: massive overstaffing and unnecessary costs.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 22.

    I bet this will appeal to a lot of people.
    I wouldn't get married there but neither would I jump out of a plane (or even get married come to that!).
    If they can generate some income then why not - as long at it doesn't get negated by an increased security bill (no doubt funded on a different budget!).

    Perhaps they could also arrange a hire an MP to be a witness to cut down on the wages bill?

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 15.

    Hidden away here in this slightly jokey situation is another example of the public sector mindset
    1. Why do MPs meals have to be subsidised in the first place?
    2. Instead of finding a new way to subsidise themselves and maintain the perks why not put the prices up? MPs are on £60k + all the perks and allowances. Can't they pay for their own food without lower earning taxpayers subsidising them?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 13.

    Yes, any public building should be used to generate revenue wherever possible. With interest payments of £4m per day, we need initiatives like this rather than just higher taxes and cuts to services.

 

Comments 5 of 6

 

More Politics stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.