Stormont opposition no closer

Stormont The Ulster Unionists have suggested changes to the Stormont system

Should Stormont have an opposition? That was a talking point back in 2012 when the Ulster Unionists were choosing a new leader.

John McCallister advocated taking the party out of the Northern Ireland Executive unilaterally. Mike Nesbitt argued there should be a referendum on changing the Stormont rules.

Two years on, the opposition debate has been surfing a fresh wave of publicity.

That's partly a result of Mr McCallister's continuing work on a planned private member's bill on opposition, but more due to Lord Empey's decision to move an amendment this week to the Northern Ireland Miscellaneous Provisions Bill which could have paved the way for a change in the Stormont system.

Then this week, Ulster Unionist MEP Jim Nicholson penned an article in which he pledged his support for a Stormont opposition.

But in case anyone thinks the mandatory coalition including five executive parties is on its way out, they should bear in mind that an assembly committee looked at this in June last year and concluded that "there is no consensus at present to move to a formal government and opposition model, such as exists in Westminster".

Most members of the committee did agree to extend informal recognition to opposition parties via additional speaking rights and status, but Sinn Féin didn't support this conclusion.

Could a Westminster amendment be the way around this blockage?

On Monday night, the House of Lords discussed the latest proposal from Lord Empey.

Mike Nesbitt Mike Nesbitt argued there should be a referendum on changing the Stormont rules.

If passed, this suggestion would have still required a request from the assembly to trigger any change in the Stormont system. But after a brief discussion, the Ulster Unionist peer withdrew his amendment.

For the lay person the Hansard of the debate makes for peculiar reading.

One after another, amendments are tabled on fundamental issues then withdrawn.

In principle, the peers could have extended the National Crime Agency to Northern Ireland, applied Westminster's reforms to the defamation law locally, ensured that future first and deputy first ministers must be jointly elected and changed the definition of a victim. In reality, none of this happened.

A cynic may conclude the septuagenarian peers were behaving like a student debating society.

But Lord Empey explained that the procedure in the Lords is for all amendments to be withdrawn at committee stage.

The Ulster Unionist peer is now hoping the government will adopt some of his ideas when the measure returns for further debate later this month. If the government doesn't bow in his direction, he is reserving the right to revive his amendment.

As opposition goes, it's hardly storming the barricades.

Back at Stormont, the TUV says the possibility of small parties and independents being allowed to band together into technical groups was knocked back just this week for a second time by the procedures committee.

Given the resistance to change, it still seems more likely any real shift will be brought about by a major party taking unilateral action, rather than the power brokers at Stormont or Westminster voluntarily rewriting the rules.

Mark Devenport Article written by Mark Devenport Mark Devenport Political editor, Northern Ireland

MLAs turn from cuts to raising revenue

Assembly members turn from discussing budget cuts to discuss how they could raise revenue.

Read full article

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 6.

    Today we see the first moves to end the ESA initiative in education.The real cost? £16m for staffing and overheads since 2008. plus the loss of calculated savings of £20m a year if the ELBs abolished. Almost £116m lost plus the cost of 400 redundancies from ELBs so far. The true cost of ESA indecision is probably nearer £120m. How would an opposition have stopped this farce happening?

  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    Once again we appear to be bereft of any chance to discuss the demise of companies such as Mivan at one end of the scale to the clothing group NV Gino which has slipped into liquidation without even a ripple in the BBC's pond. Yet our politicans quibble about a response to a letter is covered in depth. Our politics should be so much more than this......

  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    I concur with what has been said, what is needed are more / some mainstream parties who will address our socio/economic problems rather than banging on with the same old rhetoric. Things will never improve unless this happens and we will continue living in lala land, sleepwalking into oblivion......

  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    I can't even be bothered to castigate our revered leaders anymore...opposition or not, I'm loosing the will to slag them off. The primrose path to the everlasting bonfire....

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    The up-to-now failure of the Haass/O’Sullivan talks shows all too clearly the divisions that still exist in Northern Ireland
    A DUP/UUP government and a Sinn Fein/SDLP opposition, or vice versa, or any other combination of parties, would bring total deadlock.
    I think that as long as there is no consensus on how Northern Ireland moves forward, then the present system must remain in place.


Comments 5 of 6



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.