Did truth ambitions pass the Smithwick inquiry test?

 
Ch Supt Harry Breen and Supt Bob Buchanan Harry Breen and Bob Buchanan were murdered by the IRA in 1989

So does the outcome of the Smithwick tribunal strengthen arguments for what Sinn Féin terms an independent international truth recovery process?

Or does it, as the Ulster Unionists argue, deliver the death knell to the credibility of any Truth Commission?

Such a Truth Commission did not specifically feature in the questions recently posed by Richard Haass to the negotiators in his inter-party talks process.

However, Dr Haass did ask the politicians if the existing bodies or processes dealing with the past, such as the Historical Enquiries Team, historic investigations by the Police Ombudsman, inquests and inquiries, might "be reformed, combined or otherwise improved?".

'Some credibility'

Should a combined body dealing with the past be agreed, it might not be called a Truth Commission but its goal would surely include uncovering further evidence about the darkest episodes of the Troubles.

The meeting that took place between three former IRA members and the Smithwick tribunal's legal team in April 2011 could be seen as a test run for any future Truth Commission.

The former IRA members refused to give evidence under cross examination to the tribunal but they did provide a written note detailing their version of the killings. They subsequently met the tribunal team to clarify various discrepancies in their account.

Essentially the IRA's version of the ambush was that, in the words of one of the former members who talked to the Smithwick team, "this was classic surveillance, hard dogged work, there was no help from anyone at all". The IRA members said they had kept an eye on the RUC officers' red Vauxhall Cavalier for months leading up to the murders.

As Gerry Adams has noted, justice Smithwick didn't dismiss the IRA's account out of hand. Instead he noted that "there is much to lend credibility to and corroborate elements" of the IRA's version of events. He also found it "plausible" that the IRA could have mounted an operation to ambush Bob Buchanan "on the basis of an established pattern of travel".

However the judge believed there were contradictions in the IRA's version of events. Although Peter Smithwick admits to having uncovered no "direct evidence" of collusion, his detailed analysis of the timing of the operation and his belief that Chief Supt Harry Breen was the IRA's specific target led him to decide that, on the balance of probabilities, someone in the Garda Síochána tipped off the IRA and betrayed the two RUC officers.

Distrust

The copious report is much more than "tittle tattle" - to quote Gerry Adams - but still falls far short of pointing a finger at any individual identified mole.

Even if all the legal and practical hurdles to setting up a Truth Commission and granting some more limited form of immunity can be overcome, the overarching question raised again by the Smithwick tribunal is: will witnesses tell such a body the truth, and if they do, will others believe what they are hearing?

In their submission to Dr Haass, Northern Ireland's Retired Police Officers Association said they did not support the concept of a Truth Commission, and continued "nor do we have any confidence that anyone other than our members would actually tell the truth".

Nationalists who lost loved ones at the hands of the 'Glennane gang' or the British army's Military Reaction Force may feel a similar sense of distrust about any evidence some former security force members might give.

In one paragraph in his report Peter Smithwick notes that the former IRA members (who came forward through an intermediary provided by Gerry Adams) made it clear that "we are not going to compromise former comrades and locations".

This code of omerta kicked in when the tribunal asked about the van stolen for use in the ambush. The judge then muses "this does raise the very valid question in my mind, if the Provisional IRA had received assistance from a member of An Garda Síochána, would they be prepared potentially to compromise that person by revealing that fact to this tribunal?"

The polarised responses to the Smithwick tribunal from unionists and republicans don't inspire much expectation that the Haass talks will lead to the creation of some kind of truth recovery process.

But in the unlikely event that Northern Ireland politicians are ever able to agree such a commission, the kind of doubts expressed by Peter Smithwick about where the truth really lies are likely to run through the minds of victims' families and witnesses in many other harrowing cases.

 
Mark Devenport, Political editor, Northern Ireland Article written by Mark Devenport Mark Devenport Political editor, Northern Ireland

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 13.

    Ashmount - vote NI21!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 12.

    CTM87
    Apologies badly phrased...By 'naming names' I mean challenging the current political narrative. Our political class need to be challenged over their stance, policies and lack of any discernible ambition to deliver on the promises of peace. There is a huge disconnect between politicians and most people here and its time the silent or silenced majority young and old made their voices heard

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 11.

    10.Chris London

    We need to allow the past to filter out. Currently Stormont represents the previous generation, who vote for extremists because they are afraid of creating an imbalance.

    Obviously there are young people who still have a misplaced loyalty to either side, but I would say most are far more interested in an inclusive and productive Northern Ireland.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 10.

    I am very concerned, for I agree with most of what is being said here. I would go even further and say we need a new breed of politician and not the fossils from the past we have presently. We need someone who is looking forward and building a new economy and society fit for purpose. Someone who believes in inclusion rather than Sectarianism, well we can but hope.....

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 9.

    There's no future in the past.

    The future is in the future.

 

Comments 5 of 13

 

Features

  • Krak des ChevaliersSitting targets

    How ancient treasures in Syria are being bombed to pieces


  • Mesut Ozil's tattoo reads "Only God can judge me"Ink explained

    Nine World Cup players' tattoos decoded, and one who refuses


  • Putting a coin in supermarket trolleyMinor annoyance

    Why are Morrisons getting rid of coin-locks on trolleys?


  • Sekhemka statueSelling out?

    The councils tempted to cash in on their art collections


  • Google sweetsName game

    Would Google have made it as BackRub?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.