Does the Community Relations Council have a future?

Peter Robinson No guarantee: First Minister Peter Robinson says "We must always look at better ways of doing things"

We are halfway through community relations week, but will the independent organisation that runs the event be around in its current form next year?

The future of the Community Relations Council has been up for debate between the Stormont parties as part of their much delayed Cohesion, Sharing and Integration talks.

Although the final shape of that strategy has yet to be determined it seems unlikely that the Community Relations Council will hold on to both its current roles as a distributor of grants to community groups and a watchdog keeping an eye on the Executive.

The council was created as an independent charity 22 years ago, in the days of direct rule, with the aim of "promoting a peaceful and fair society based on reconciliation and mutual trust."


It has a dual purpose - administering millions of pounds in grants to community groups tackling division on the ground, and serving as a watchdog commenting on how successive administrations performed when it came to building a shared future.

However the council's relations with the two biggest Stormont parties have sometimes been fractious.

When the Executive's draft strategy on Cohesion, Sharing and Integration emerged two years ago it was criticised by those who believed it enshrined a "carve up culture".

Sinn Fein's Martina Anderson responded angrily back in 2010 by referring to what she called a raft of "unelected, unnecessary and ineffective" good relations quangos, adding that in the context of an agreed Cohesion Sharing and Integration strategy "many of these quangos could be redundant and should be abolished".

The DUP has been less outspoken, but late last month I asked the First Minister if the council would continue its current role.

Peter Robinson didn't provide any guarantees, telling me "I think we must always look and see if there are better ways of doing things and we mustn't get tied to any particular organisation that has been there and has done a good job while it has been in existence."


Earlier this week the Alliance leader David Ford clashed with both the DUP and Sinn Fein over which party was serious about community relations.

One of the "minimum requirements" Mr Ford set out for a new Cohesion Sharing and Integration policy was what he called "an independent delivery system for community relations, with enough clout to challenge government when it isn't doing enough."

He elaborated on this, telling me that "it's absolutely clear that we need an independent voice dealing with community relations matters and in particular holding the government to account when it's failing to deliver. The Executive is currently failing to deliver, that's why we need an independent body with teeth."

What's under debate is not the outright abolition of the council, but a division between its grant giving and watchdog roles. In fact much of the Community Relations Council's grant activity has now been taken over by the new Stormont Victims Support Service, whilst others grants have been lost because European peace money is running out.

The Irish News columnist Brian Feeney is no friend of the council - he sees it as "a bit of window dressing by the Northern Ireland Office" which didn't seriously address divisions here.


However he warns the Stormont politicians they if they establish a new body to give out cash to community groups, they will have to be careful that's it's seen to be independent rather than being run by a political party or one government department.

"There have been all sorts of criticisms about an alleged slush fund that Sinn Fein and the DUP are administering through the OFMDFM, but there has to be some sort of organisation to hand out those grants.

"In some places in Britain that have problems of the streets it's local councils that give out grants and maybe there's a point in doing that here that you give money to councils and they hand it out rather than having some grandly named Community Relations Council."

The Community Relations Council chair Tony McCusker expressed some frustration earlier this week over the delay in the politicians producing an agreed strategy.

He makes the point that his council was set up as an independent charity and says they would be concerned if the plan is to turn them into an advisory body appointed by Executive ministers.


"I think our preference would be that the CRCF would remain as an independent body" he told me "but be invited to advise and to challenge the Executive and local society about how community relations issues are being taken forward."

So how does Mr McCusker respond to criticism of his organisation as an unnecessary quango and a part of the community relations industry, whose job would be better performed by local councils?

"There's an issue of 11 or 26 bodies doing it rather than just one" Mr McCusker says "I think the other issue is whether community relations becomes subject to political oversight and political dogfights either within the Executive or at a local level. The advantage of the Community Relations Council is it has its independence and can sit outside the political demands of the parties at both levels."

One compromise might be to remove the council's grant giving role, but hand it over neither to the district councils nor to the First and Deputy First Ministers' Office, but instead to a small number of regional administrative bodies.

However whether any such compromise can be agreed will depend on the Cohesion Sharing and Integration talks making the kind of progress they have so far failed to deliver.

Mark Devenport Article written by Mark Devenport Mark Devenport Political editor, Northern Ireland

DUP weigh up their options after BBC TV debate decision

So the BBC Trust has backed the Corporation's editors over their decision not to invite the DUP on to its planned seven party UK election debate.

Read full article


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    Typical really, Our politicians are being held to account by an autonomous body such as CRC and they say its not working.... SF and the DUP do not know whats best in terms of community relations- the draft CSI disaster document told us that. Long live CRC! If community relations is left to the orange and green of politicians our little country will become more divided than ever :(

  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    I totally agree, our politicans are at their happiest when sniping around the peripheries rather than getting stuck in to what really matters. Lets face it why bother with the economy when they can score points by knocking hell out of each other. And we like fools have got caught up with their rhetoric. Even those who run our quangos and civil service need to step up to the plate.

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    @ Chris - What would our esteemed MLAs do without the past to hide behind? There's never going to be 'grown up' politics here while the past still rules us. The thought of a shared future, however that turns out, is too much it would seem.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    Why should it for as far as the politicians are concerned they would much prefer the status quo. For while we have blame and hate they are never going to be held to account. Is it not time that we started to look forward and to do so we need proper politicans who will tackle real issues and not those who rake up the past while looking back and blaming the other side.



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.