The Queen, Symbolism and Sorrow

 
Queen Elizabeth II and President Mary McAleese Queen Elizabeth II and President Mary McAleese lay wreaths at the Garden of Remembrance

"Hugely symbolic". Probably the two most over used words to describe the Queen's visit to the Irish Republic. I confess I myself have used the "s" word, and am struggling to find an alternative. Perhaps my struggle is evidence I lack the purple prose gene.

Or maybe it's part and parcel of a deliberately creative ambiguity fostered by both London and Dublin in which the spectator is invited to read whatever he or she wants into a President and a Queen standing, heads bowed, before the undeniably impressive Children of Lir statue at Dublin's Garden of Remembrance.

At a briefing given by the Foreign Secretary William Hague and the Irish Foreign Minister Eamon Gilmore, Channel Four's Gary Gibbon invited the politicians to share the interpretation that the joint appearance at the Garden was "a moment of contrition".

However the ministers weren't going there - it was "a hugely significant event", full of "huge symbolism" and an "important statement about our history and our future". But "contrition"? Well that would be in the eye of the beholder.

I asked the Foreign Secretary if it would be appropriate for the Queen to apologise for past British misdeeds in Ireland when she addresses guests at tomorrow night's state banquet. Mr Hague responded that Britain and Ireland weren't "glossing over the past".

This visit was about recognising the events of the past and showing how both states were moving together into the future. "That's the way to treat it rather than talking about apologies", Mr Hague concluded.

So - if that's anything to go by - expect a carefully crafted speech but something which stops short of a direct apology. Mr Hague also avoided any promises on issues like revealing official records on the Dublin Monaghan bombings.

It's something he says he's prepared to discuss, but he cited legal difficulties and constraints under the European Convention on Human Rights.

Both governments are much keener to talk about the future - the potential for further trade between partners who already do business worth one billion Euros a week.

Eamon Gilmore went so far as to suggest that the visit will put not just the history of the troubles in the past, but show Ireland was moving on from its "recent economic history" and rebuilding its reputation. Nice thought, although it's maybe a bit optimistic to talk about the crash as history just yet.

Both governments will be pleased that the Gardai were able to contain the inevitable protests - and that the visit has made the requisite visual impact.

In the sweep of British and Irish history, it is "hugely symbolic", it does underline the progress that has been made in Northern Ireland and the shared hopes for a brighter future.

Read more into it at your peril.

 
Mark Devenport, Political editor, Northern Ireland Article written by Mark Devenport Mark Devenport Political editor, Northern Ireland

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 11.

    Nationalism wasn,t holding it,s collective breath waiting for the english queen to say sorry for every injustice carried out in her name, the right wing of here government seen to that.
    "huge symbolism" doesn,t take the place of straight taking.
    The visit was more about massaging the egos of the southern elite than trying to help forward any real plan for the island.

    Eyes wide open

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 10.

    SEE YOU IN COURT, PETER

    Now that Iris is clearly recovering, Robinson has the time to initiate the oft-threatened legal redress against the BBC et al.

    He might also reveal the cost of his QC's advice over allegations the BBC Spotlight programme raised about him back in January, 2010 (ref http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/markdevenport/2010/06/payment_overdue.html

    Susie
    Carryduff

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 9.

    It's probably a good thing for Ireland in the long run, yet not good for the people in the North, who wish to be free from the shackles of Britain and it's government. Only this one time can it be an us and them; North and South, as the only difference between the two peoples, is that the South has been freed from the shackles, while the island as a whole still has a British noose around its neck!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 8.

    If Irishmen go...to die, not for Ireland, but for Flanders...for...sand in... Mesopotamia, or a...trench...of Gallipoli, they are winning self-government for Ireland. But if they...lay down their lives on their native soil, if they dare to dream...that freedom can be won...at home by men resolved to fight for,...then they are traitors,...and their...deaths are phases of a dishonourable fantasy

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 7.

    Macxlii is correct when he says the Republic should be careful about what some of them may wish for. However I think they and their government recognised this when they signed the GFA giving up their claim to the North and giving the British in the North a guaranteed veto on Irish unity. They know (apart from a few nutters) that is good-bye to unity barring some unforeseen seismic event.

 

Comments 5 of 11

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.