Assembly race produces dead heat
Martin McGuinness and Peter Robinson were both satisfied with their parties' outcome
So at long last all the results are in.
Satisfaction for the DUP and Sinn Fein, who increase their mutual dominance.
Soul searching for the Ulster Unionists and the SDLP, who both have to consider what future direction they can take to regain relevance.
Tom Elliott's clash with Sinn Fein supporters in Omagh gives the impression he will position the UUP as TUV-lite.
However a sizeable section of his Stormont team are closer to Alliance in their outlook.
Sinn Fein's victory in East Antrim and Alliance's failure to secure a second seat in North Down have set up a fascinating mathematical dead heat for the final Executive department.
Little did I think, when I started writing on the Devenport Diaries about it months ago, that the Mrs Wilson versus Mr Wilson's assistant battle would have such far reaching implications.
Steven Agnew's last gasp victory for the Greens leaves Alliance on 8 seats - exactly half the Ulster Unionist total of 16.
Under the D'Hondt system the UUP gets one department, but when its turn comes for a second pick, its seats have half the value.
So it's 8 versus 8. At this point the tie breaker is how many first preference votes each party received, with the UUP vote tally also being halved.
According to this method, Alliance is also ahead, so should take its first ministry before the UUP get a chance for a second.
Done and dusted?
So all done and dusted? Not so fast - could the UUP approach the East Londonderry MLA David McClarty, who stood as an independent after being deselected?
If Mr McClarty is added to the UUP total they edge ahead. The former deputy speaker may exact a price from his former colleagues, but his difference was always with the activists in his area, not the UUP hierarchy.
However, will the Assembly authorities accept that an independent can be counted towards the UUP total, even if he comes from the party "gene pool"?
Equally if the UUP can court Mr McClarty might Alliance approach Steven Agnew (after all the Greens were part of the same United Community group in Stormont)?
If Alliance gets the last department under D'Hondt, they will take this in addition to the Justice Ministry. That is almost certainly going to David Ford again under the cross-community compromise reached by the DUP and Sinn Fein during the Hillsborough negotiations.
The compromise is due to expire in May 2012, but in the meantime it would mean a party with eight MLAs holding twice as many departments as a party with 16 MLAs.
No doubt this will spark protests about a lack of democratic fairness. So expect plenty of machinations before the Stormont ministerial line up is finalised. Indeed I would not be surprised if this one ends up in the courts.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~59~RS~)




Hollande signs gay marriage bill
Sick art
Tweets of the week
Clocking out
Most wanted
Story of the S-Class
Fast Track
Comment number 37.
healyonenil11th May 2011 - 20:46
Thanks sethspeirs, it looks like Devenportonenil!
Link to this (Comment number 37)
Comment number 36.
DisgustedinDERRY11th May 2011 - 17:13
ManOfPie
Elementary my dear Watson!
Link to this (Comment number 36)
Comment number 35.
ManOfPie11th May 2011 - 15:38
DinD,
It would appear that Mark's maths are correct. Perhaps it's easier to have appropriate brackets for such equations.
Don't think of it as "87,531 / 1, then add 1"
Think of it as "85,531 / (1 + 1)"
Which is, of course, 85,531 / 2.
Link to this (Comment number 35)
Comment number 34.
sethspeirs11th May 2011 - 11:29
@healyonenil. Mark is correct.
S18 (6) of the NI Act 1998 states:
Where the figures given by the formula for two or more political parties are equal, each of those figures shall be recalculated with S being equal to the number of first preference votes cast for the party at the last general election of members of the Assembly.
So you replace the seats with votes in rhe event of a tie.
Link to this (Comment number 34)
Comment number 33.
DisgustedinDERRY11th May 2011 - 11:13
Mark,
I read the link the other day and thought there was a mistake. 87,531 divided by 1 is 87,531; is it not? Should that not read: 'UUP votes 87,531 divided by 2 + 1 (the ministry the party already has) = 43,765.5'.
Am I missing something?
Link to this (Comment number 33)
Comments 5 of 37