Fracking firm scaling back operation at Balcombe

Fashion designer Vivienne Westwood with campaigners in Balcombe Fashion designer Vivienne Westwood has joined campaigners at Balcombe
Protests at Balcombe Police expect an extra 1,000 campaigners at the protest site this weekend
Reclaim the Power camp Campaign group No Dash For Gas has organised a six-day camp at Balcombe
Test drilling equipment Cuadrilla said it was scaling back drilling during the event for safety reasons

Energy firm Cuadrilla has scaled back exploratory drilling in West Sussex on police advice, as more activists begin arriving at a nearby protest site.

The company has been looking for oil near the village of Balcombe, but has not ruled out using the controversial technique of fracking to release gas.

Police believe environmental activists at the site are about to begin a campaign of civil disobedience.

They expect about 1,000 extra people to join existing protesters this weekend.

The BBC's Angus Crawford said about 100 activists arrived by train at Balcombe railway station at about 13:00 BST before being escorted to the demonstration site by police.

Some of the protesters were waving anti-fracking banners and others were wearing Guy Fawkes masks, which have become a feature of demonstrations around the world.

Fashion designer Vivienne Westwood also joined campaigners on Friday afternoon.

Fences erected

At the scene

A small number of protesters arrived at Balcombe station and were escorted towards the fracking site by police.

It's difficult to make an accurate estimate, but about 100 protesters were involved.

They were joined by the international fashion designer Vivienne Westwood.

The protesters, who were quiet and orderly, were escorted by at least five police vehicles and between 30 and 40 officers on foot.

Cuadrilla's decision to scale back its drilling means exploration operations will be effectively at a standstill just two weeks after drilling got under way at Balcombe.

The number of workers on the site has been reduced and large reinforced fences are being erected.

Cuadrilla said in a statement: "After taking advice from Sussex Police, Cuadrilla is scaling back operations ahead of this weekend's No Dash For Gas event.

"During this time, our main concern is the safety of our staff, Balcombe's residents and the protesters following threats of direct action against the exploration site.

"We will resume full operations as soon as it is safe to do so."

Matt Lambert, a spokesman for the energy firm, said workers had faced intimidation during their time at the site in Balcombe.

'Tremendous provocation'

He added: "They're basically just oil men trying to go about their business, they're ordinary engineers, geologists and so forth, they're not used to this sort of thing and they've put up with it very stoically.

"It is quite unpleasant, people take photographs of you, take photographs of the number plate, we have to have police escorts out to get away from the site and of course it's unpleasant."

Campaigners welcomed Cuadrilla's decision to scale back its operations.

Start Quote

"Cuadrilla's announcement that they'll halt drilling is already a victory for us, but it's only a start”

End Quote Luke Johnson

Luke Johnson said: "Cuadrilla's announcement that they'll halt drilling is already a victory for us, but it's only a start.

"We would like to make sure they don't frack in Balcombe, or anywhere else at all."

Cuadrilla is drilling a 3,000ft (900m) vertical well and a 2,500ft (750m) horizontal bore but said fracking for shale gas would need fresh permission.

'Take back power'

Environmental campaigners have been camped at the site for the past three weeks, with about 40 people arrested in that time.

Sussex Police believe more people will arrive for a six-day camp organised by the No Dash For Gas group.

It warned it would engage in mass civil disobedience - last year members occupied West Burton power station in Nottinghamshire.

Jamie Kelsey Fry, from No Dash For Gas, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme said that the protesters would be doing "everything they can to make the country think twice" about fracking.

"It was exactly these kinds of actions hundreds of years ago that gave women the vote with the Suffragettes. It's absolutely no different," he said.

Mr Kelsey Fry added the protesters would be risking "their liberty and personal harm" to highlight awareness of the government's "disastrous choice" to pursue fracking.

"This is not fun. People aren't going down there for fun. It's not fun to see the heavy policing that I predict will be happening over this weekend," he added.

In an open letter, Balcombe Parish Council chairman Alison Stevenson called on the group not to break the law.

Fossil fuels

Start Quote

We are acutely aware of the impact that this is having on the residents of Balcombe and back their call to protesters not to engage in any criminal activity”

End Quote Supt Lawrence Hobbs

Supt Lawrence Hobbs, of Sussex Police, said: "We are acutely aware of the impact that this is having on the residents of Balcombe and back their call to protesters not to engage in any criminal activity in the pursuit of their aims.

"We will continue to facilitate peaceful protest but newcomers to the site should be aware that if they commit criminal offences then we will collect the evidence and they will be arrested."

Cuadrilla has said it is "unlikely" to use the site for the production of fossil fuels.

Both Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace have spoken out against the company's activities.

Prime Minister David Cameron has urged the UK to embrace fracking - short for "hydraulic fracturing" - as an important source of energy production.

But opponents of the technique claim it can cause water contamination and environmental damage and can also trigger small earth tremors.

Professor Peter Styles, who advises the government on fracking safety, told the Today programme there was a danger that opposition to the process would "perpetuate the use of coal-fired energy... which is by far the worst kind of energy rather than gas".

"Replacing coal with gas is the logical step to reducing the UK's carbon footprint and having stable gas prices," he said.

fracking graphic

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 1541.

    Any chance of fracking in Chipping Norton?

    No, I thought not

  • rate this

    Comment number 1540.

    What position does Lord Howell have at Cuadrilla?

    I wonder how many other Members of Parliament have interests in Fracking companies?

  • rate this

    Comment number 1539.

    Many posts saying wind & solar power need more power to build than they produce. I think they are confused with their energy efficiency
    A wind turbine is 60% efficient this means it converts 60% of the energy input (wind ) into energy output (electricity)
    Incidentally coal fired power stations are also about 65% efficient except their energy source is expensive polluting coal not free wind

  • rate this

    Comment number 1538.

    1537--what on earth has anything in your ramblings have to do with fracking ??
    These off-topic nuisances are always a blight on good debate about the article which is the subject of this Blog.
    As for the correct topic, I refer you to my #1536, which a few folk seem to agree with .......

  • rate this

    Comment number 1537.

    Many people are commenting that wind turbines cause bird deaths which is true but here are some facts (unfortuneately the only source I could find is from the USA but it is still relevant)
    Bir deaths caused by :-
    Wind turbines 10 - 40,000
    Power lines 130- 174 million
    Motor vehicles 60 - 8 million
    Collision with windows 100 million to 1 billion
    Cats (domestic and wild ) 100s of millions

  • rate this

    Comment number 1536.

    What a poor country we live in.Whole communities bemoan the loss of bestial work down pits, a degrading occupation.Thank God, they've nearly all gone.We look around for new energy and come up with one that looks promising: "fracking".Along come the tree-huggers who say it's bad:harmful to water supplies, causes earthquakes(struth!).Why not try it and see--till then keep your traps shut,Luddites!

  • rate this

    Comment number 1535.


    I have to "bang on", to quote Alisater Campbell. There is unlikely to be a single non-local protester who dosen't have his gas bill paid by his working neighbour whilst the work he could be doing is done by a quest worker with capilat letters.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1534.

    in answer to the question of who "'mob' or professional protesters" are and whether they're just troublemaking dole scum, I am one of those, I have spent time there and intend to spend more time there. Most of the protestors are locals. This is happening in my county, I am local to this. I am a skilled professional who works in broadcasting. I have days off and chose to spend my time supporting.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1533.

    Energy companies/politicos/scientists/activists seem to contradict each other w/ opposite stats +suspicions of back-handers- difficult to trust anybody on the issue..

    What's a logical (&environmentally-conscious) person to do?

    Still waiting for fusion power..heard of when still @school; if remember correctly, how only exhaust= water vapour?
    & water-powered cars (Tomorrow's World)
    But 15yrs ltr..

  • rate this

    Comment number 1532.

    911 That's not the same. The law is on their side until the pollution starts.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1531.

    "Fashion designer Vivienne Westwood has joined campaigners at Balcombe"

    I'm 58. Most of my adult life I have had to endure self-publicist Vivienne Westwood banging on.

    I note she manages to campaign - while ensuring she's in front of the cameras.

    As a millionairess, does she care about the price of fuel?

    I feel sorry for the youngsters being fooled.

    They'll pay higher fuel costs.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1530.

    regarding the earlier comment "'mob' or professional protesters"
    this is an image used by the Government spin doctors to attempt at discrediting the protesters. They don't have a decent argument against the fact that they choose not to look too deeply into the risks of fracking, instead eyeing up the financial gains.
    to be continued....

  • rate this

    Comment number 1529.

    1525: toorie
    Apparently they had to inject him with water, sand and chemicals before he would release it.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1528.

    But if we are going to meet our (legally binding) carbon reduction promises we need to use this marvelous new fuel to ignite our economy (and our drinking water).
    Luckily those commitments are in the future and therefore inconsequential .
    No problem then.
    Wait a minute we can just sell the fracking gas to someone else and then its not our problem.
    A problem shared is a problem halved

  • rate this

    Comment number 1527.

    1511. AlexeiF
    Obviously meteo reports in a particular area can predict general wind conditions, but even assuming accurate (?) reports, can actual energy o/p be predicted, since wind isn't a constant?

    I suspect the birds currently killed would beg to differ :-P

  • rate this

    Comment number 1526.

    I don't know how I feel about fracking as I don't know enough about it to pass comment and it is for the people who live in the area most affected that should have the main say but what I would like to know is who are the 'mob' or professional protesters? How do they earn their money? What is their day job? Are they claiming benefits? Or are they all rich with plenty of money on their hands?

  • rate this

    Comment number 1525.

    1523.bonnysdad That wouldn't be the same David Cameron who shanghied Nurse Edwards legacy money and was allegedly going to use this to pay for the Conservatives publicity campiagn in the next on-coming Election..

  • rate this

    Comment number 1524.

    13 Minutes ago

    Sorry, but the Energy output is well predicted; construction costs repay in 6 to 12 months;


    At what price per kWh actually generated?

  • rate this

    Comment number 1523.

    Why is it that countries all over Europe have banned fracking outright or introduced a moratorium on it until more research has been carried out in to its consequences, whilst at the same time David Cameron is telling us all to get behind it ?
    It may be perfectly safe, I don't know. But I'm sorry, Cameron's reputation for looking after the rich precedes him, and I just don't trust him.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1522.

    Much fuss is made when politicians are found to be 'close' to oil companies, but don't hear quite the same furore wrt green energy. Why not?

    New energy sources which (partially) solve some problems (energy/emissions) while causing other new (& sometimes blatantly obvious) environmental ones, while continuing wide-scale energy wastage at point of use -> v.short-sighted..


Page 1 of 78


BBC Sussex



Min. Night 7 °C


Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.