Tube strike on despite RMT and LU coming close to a deal

 
Earls Court Earls Court was particularly impacted by the strike

Related Stories

On Friday both sides in the Tube dispute looked drained and exhausted after eight hours of intense talks.

Whispers of a deal had been emerging and both sides admit they weren't far off a deal in the row over ticket offices.

The RMT Union says it would have suspended action if London Underground agreed to a consultation, re-instated the review of all ticket offices (outlined after the last strike) and the protection of all staff pay.

At 16:00 BST the RMT claimed LU said that for three weeks of talks, it would pause its implementation of the cuts.

For that to happen the RMT would have to end the entire dispute, not just suspend this strike.

The union would not consider that and at 18:00 the talks collapsed dramatically. Both sides walked out into the TV cameras.

Slim hope

Phil Hufton from LU said: "We have had well over 40 meetings, and came to Acas today to listen, make progress and bring an end to this dispute. The RMT leadership clearly did not.

"They have still offered no credible alternative proposals and are still demanding the wholesale cessation of all modernisation as the price for calling off their pointless strike next week.

"Despite our offer to continue talking, their interest seems to be in preserving the past and forcing London's fare and tax payers to foot the bill."

John Leach from the RMT said: "They have not taken up our offer to suspend the action if they suspend their implementation and they've spent eight hours talking about very little. Regrettably the strike is still on."

All of this is hampered by poor industrial relations - rooted in the ticket office dispute of 2010 - and what seems to be a severe lack of trust.

This is now an increasingly bitter and ugly dispute and commuters will be wondering where it will end. How long will RMT members hold out? How many days of disruption can LU handle? And more importantly what kind of dysfunctional split company will be left at the end?

Both sides seem to be indicating they are available for talks over the weekend, but it's a slim hope.

 
Tom Edwards Article written by Tom Edwards Tom Edwards Transport correspondent, London

Family of killed cyclist Janina Gehlau speaks out

The husband and mother of a cyclist who died after a collision with a HGV in London speak out for the first time.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 2.

    So close yet so far away. Should this service be considered essential, thereby minimising the economic damage to the heart of the British economy? Similar to fire/police/ems & hospital staff, certain commuter rail lines, the London Underground & the Channel Tunnel system should be classed as essential services. Unions must provide reduced, essential service levels while strike action is underway.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 3.

    Yeah, good idea gpman, lets get all those pesky working class on zero hour contracts and we can really keep them in their place. Its been proved that them kind can survive on bread and water, so why when do they need decent paying jobs, because next thing we know, they may think they are as good as you.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 4.

    The interests of the London and national economy far outweigh the protests of this militant, far left organisation that dearly clings on to the 70's way of doing union business. I think LU should carry on with their plans and get the staff off their backsides, behind those windows and really help commuters and visitors to the city.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 5.

    Johnsmith: so wrong. In both fact and attitude. It's the old left who seem to want to keep the old class divides, not the rest of us. And this isn't about sacking or reducing anyone's wages. Read the facts, discard your dogma.

    Maidavale1: spot on.

    RMT: in the end, this will happen. Deal with it. It's a good thing. And your customers want it.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 6.

    Such avoidable disputes make it appear that the RMT hanker after the 70's when unions could hold the country to ransom. Other European countries seek working constructive relationships, whereas this is adversarial. RMT need to move to the 2010's and accept that modernisation is positive.

    The militant attitude of disrupting Londoners to flex Union muscle is NOT supported by LUL customers.

 

Comments 5 of 7

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.