Thames airport 'should be rejected' - MPs report


Louise Ellman MP: Heathrow closure "would mean massive disruption and loss of jobs".

Related Stories

The government should reject the "Boris Island" Thames Estuary airport plan and expand Heathrow instead, a report by MPs has said.

Mayor of London Boris Johnson has argued for a new four-runway hub airport in the Thames Estuary, to the east of London.

The House of Commons Transport Committee said that would be hugely expensive and damage wildlife habitat.

It also said a new hub could lead to the closure of Heathrow.

Gatwick Airport said a third alternative, namely a second runway to the south of London, "will be the most deliverable solution and will provide the connections the UK needs whilst minimising environmental impacts".

But the Transport Committee said adding new runways to expand other existing airports was not a long-term solution and dismissed the Gatwick idea.

Boris Johnson: Trouble with building a third runway is it just compounds the mistake

The MPs said a third runway at Heathrow was necessary instead, and even suggested that a fourth runway might have merit.

One of several proposals that would eventually see a fourth runway being built comes from think tanks Policy Exchange and Centre Forum.

They suggest shifting the new runways 3 kilometres, or about 2 miles, to the west of Heathrow, but admits that at least 700 properties would need to be demolished to make room for additional capacity.

'Global aviation hub'

The committee's report also proposed that:

  • residents affected by increased noise at Heathrow should be compensated
  • the government should consider an "unrestricted open skies policy" outside the South East to boost regional airports
  • Gatwick and Stansted should get their own dedicated express rail services
  • the government should consider reducing or scrapping air passenger duty.

John Longworth, director general at the British Chambers of Commerce, welcomed the committee's conclusion.

Start Quote

If you get to host your continent's main hub, you benefit from direct flights to every corner of the globe. That makes your city a much more attractive place for global businesses to invest”

End Quote

"Businesses across the UK will certainly be encouraged by the publication of this report," he said.

"Now it is time for the government to stop dithering and make this strategy a reality."

A Department for Transport spokesman said: "This government is determined to find a lasting solution to maintain the UK's global aviation hub status."

'Huge public investment'

A third runway at Heathrow is opposed by both residents and councils in west London.

Mr Johnson said a four-runway airport to the west of London would be "politically undeliverable" and would "consign millions of Londoners to unacceptable levels of noise pollution", while a three-runway airport would be "obsolete" as soon as it was built.

"Moving London slightly to the east" would be cheaper, he said in an interview with the BBC.

But Transport Committee chair Louise Ellman MP, disagreed: "Research we commissioned made plain that building an entirely new hub airport east of London could not be done without huge public investment in new ground transport infrastructure.

"Evidence to our inquiry also showed a substantial potential impact on wildlife habitat in the Thames Estuary.

"The viability of an estuary hub airport would also require the closure of Heathrow - a course of action that would have unacceptable consequences."

Mr Johnson said: "The committee is bang on the button in saying we need a proper hub airport. But by suggesting that Heathrow should double its runways from two to four, the committee is putting four fingers up to hundreds of thousands of Londoners."

Proposed four-runway Heathrow

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 586.

    Once upon a time I actually got direct BA flights between Manchester and Los Angeles. Why THIS service was scrapped is beyond me. We have a number of Regional Airports that service the Puddle-Jump Euro-Holiday places, but for the long-haul flights the only options are LHR or LGW. Rail Travel costs to get to them (from the North) are often more expensive than the Flight.

  • rate this

    Comment number 581.

    If you follow the Governments argument for HS2 then the ideal place to build and expand an Airport is Birmingham!
    The West Midlands is the fastest growing industrial centre with the motor industry leading the way.
    It will also be quicker for Boris to nip to Birmingham than across London to Docklands!

  • rate this

    Comment number 580.

    If they are set on building another airport in the SE then I think the best option would be to build it in the estuary. Heathrow is already at capacity and expanding would be costly and socially detrimental.

    Eventually we would be able to transfer LHR's traffic to the estuary and look at redeveloping it into a mixed commercial/residential area and remove low-level air traffic from over London.

  • rate this

    Comment number 425.

    Why does everything have to be London based!

    There are big companies all over the UK!

    Filton Airport in Bristol has been closed, has a runway to take all types of planes as is it was built for Concorde and is near the M5 and M4 motoways..but for some reason the local council think its better to have housing in the west than a big airport!

  • rate this

    Comment number 400.

    This issue is easy, do not build more airports/runways. Take measures to control use. We could tax and auction flight slots, so the most profitable use of the space is used rather than cheap flights for pointless holidays. That way business flights would harmlessly take precedence, and the froth only use left over capacity. Such means would also make it easy to act on pollution by reducing slots.


Comments 5 of 13


More Business stories



Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.