Bradley Wiggins backs cyclist helmet laws after bus death
Cycle safety debate after latest cyclist's death
Olympic champion Bradley Wiggins has backed a change in the law to oblige cyclists to wear helmets after a man died in a crash near the Olympic Park.
He was asked his views on the safety of London's roads after Daniel Harris was hit by an Olympic bus on Wednesday.
It has not been revealed if the 28-year-old was wearing a helmet, but Wiggins said forcing cyclists to take precautions would make the roads safer.
The London Cycling Campaign described it as a "damaging diversion".
Mr Harris is the 10th cyclist to die on the capital's roads this year.
'Help ourselves'Wiggins, speaking after winning his Olympic gold medal in Wednesday's time trial, said making it illegal to cycle without a helmet would make the roads safer "because ultimately, if you get knocked off and you ain't got a helmet on, then how can you kind of argue".
He added: "[People] shouldn't be riding along with iPods and phones and things on and [they] should have lights and all those things.
“Start Quote
End Quote Gerhard Weiss London Cycling CampaignHelmets have nothing to do with collisions and it's a side-issue and a serious diversion”
"So I think when there's laws passed for cyclists, then you're protected and you can say, well, I've done everything to be safe."
He went on: "It's dangerous and London is a busy city with a lot of traffic. I think we have to help ourselves sometimes.
"I haven't lived in London for 10 to 15 years now and it's got a lot busier since I was riding a bike as a kid round here, and I got knocked off several times."
Later he tweeted to point out he was not campaigning for a change in the law, and had only been responding to a question that was put to him.
"Just to confirm I haven't called for helmets to be made the law as reports suggest," Wiggins wrote.
"I wasn't on me soap box CALLING, was asked what I thought".
The fatal crash, involving a bus carrying media workers from the Olympics, happened close to the hockey centre, velodrome and Paralympic tennis arena at about 19:45 BST at the junction of Ruckholt Road and East Cross Route in Hackney.
Mr Harris, from Ilford, is the 10th cyclist to die in London since January.
The bus driver was held on suspicion of causing death by dangerous driving. A 65-year-old man was later released on bail pending further inquiries.
Bradley Wiggins said he was knocked off his bike several times while growing up in London
Gerhard Weiss, from the London Cycling Campaign, said the group had been consulted when the first planning applications came out for the Olympic Park.
He said the authorities had been warned that Ruckholt Road was a "danger zone" in 2009, adding: "Helmets have nothing to do with collisions and it's a side-issue and a serious diversion."
Mr Weiss said: "The junction has never been good for cycling and we hoped that the Olympics would have been a good opportunity to improve matters but that didn't seem to happen."
London Mayor Boris Johnson said there were no plans to require cyclists to wear helmets or to provide them for the capital's fleet of hire bikes.
He said: "I think he's [Bradley Wiggins] quite right to say that people should do if they've got one.
"But we've absolutely no plans to make them mandatory.
"But the evidence is mixed. I have to say that in countries where they have made them compulsory, it hasn't always necessarily been good for cycling."
Chris Peck, policy co-ordinator of national cycling charity CTC, told the BBC: "Making cycle helmets compulsory would be likely to have an overall damaging effect on public health, since the health benefits of cycling massively outweigh the risks and we know that where enforced, helmet laws tend to lead to an immediate reduction in cycling."
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~36~RS~)


New Metropolitan Police HQ announced
Dozens die in Iraqi car bomb attacks
Foot loose
Afrikaner agony
America's Latino future
Hoops and dreams
Be kind, rewind
HARDtalk
Comment number 1169.
shartora3rd August 2012 - 9:22
I take responsibility for my own actions, including the consequences of those actions. I fail to see why this attitude needs to be criminalised.
Link to this (Comment number 1169)
Comment number 1165.
Simon3rd August 2012 - 9:13
Helmets should be mandatory as should cycle insurance.
Issues on all sides:
Cyclists who have no concept of road safety due to lack of training.
Incompetent Car/Vehicle drivers who should never have been given a license.
People think they are invincible until they are hit by a solid object or ride/drive into one.
Cyclists/Car/Vehicle drivers who blatantly ignore road rules and regulations.
Link to this (Comment number 1165)
Comment number 1159.
Bonehead3rd August 2012 - 9:04
There is no better protection than keeping out of danger, not all accidents can be avoided, but most can, and for cyclists this means keep away from the left hand side of vehicles at junctions. Cycling safely does not mean cycling badly. Helmets are of limited benefit and restrict awareness of traffic, particularly when looking behind to see what might be about to cut you up.
Link to this (Comment number 1159)
Comment number 854.
knickershop2nd August 2012 - 16:00
Culture and attitudes play an enormous role here. The Dutch are taught from an early age to respect all road users, especially the vulnerable such as pushbikes, invalid-buggies and horses.
And most cyclists don't wear helmets unless they are called Marianne Vos and are racing Lizzie Armitstead in the Olympics!
Link to this (Comment number 854)
Comment number 852.
Steve2nd August 2012 - 15:59
I feel that all cyclists should wear helmets.
It would also be nice if helmets were made available to people no matter their head size. You have a big head and you can forget it.
All cyclists should be made to take the proficiency test before they are allowed to go on the road.
Well why not? You can still do damage to yourself & others with a bike maybe then people will have more understanding!
Link to this (Comment number 852)
Comments 5 of 18