St Paul's protest camp: Bishop calls for no violence
The Bishop of London: ''Nobody wants violence and that is absolutely clear''
There is "no use for violent confrontation" with protesters outside St Paul's Cathedral, the Bishop of London has said.
Dr Richard Chartres met demonstrators camped outside to discuss their views.
In an address Dr Chartres told protesters, who fear forcible removal, he shared many of their concerns on corporate greed.
However, he stopped short of agreeing to protesters' demands for a promise not to support eviction.
Legal action to clear the camp is being taken but that process could take months to complete.
'Benefit of the doubt'"I have spoken to police and... I do not think we are on the inevitable road to violence," said Dr Chartres.
"Getting the legal situation clear is probably a sensible precautionary measure."
St Paul's reopened on Friday after closing for a week, for the first time since WWII, because of health and safety concerns of cathedral authorities.
Dr Chartres had a frank exchange with protesters
Lucy, one of the protesters, welcomed the speech but said they needed a promise from the church that they would not be forcibly removed.
"We need more of a guarantee that this is not going to happen," she told BBC News.
"That means me being dragged out of my tent in the night, my hair being pulled - we need a cast iron guarantee from the church this will not happen."
Asked whether the church was doing what Jesus would have done, she said: "I hope they will strive to do so.
"I give them the benefit of the doubt."
Cathedral authorities are offering the protesters' group, also known as Occupy London Stock Exchange (OLSX), the chance to hold a public debate in the church.
Chancellor's resignationHowever, they want them to clear the camp before this takes place.
A number of Church of England figures have criticised the way in which the situation has been handled by St Paul's authorities.
Their decision to begin the eviction process prompted Dr Giles Fraser to step down as canon chancellor, on Thursday.
It was Canon Fraser who told police to allow the protesters to set up camp outside the cathedral on 15 October after they had been prevented from camping by the London Stock Exchange in privately-owned Paternoster Square near St Paul's.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~20~RS~)


Support for embattled head teacher
Syria army storms rebel-held town
Teutonic Texans
Foot loose
Clocking out
Tortured for ransom
Art in the shadow of Hitler
The Culture Show
Comment number 698.
Graham30th October 2011 - 23:25
Seriously, this is not about the cause of their protest, just the manner in which they are conducting it. Protest is a valid right, camping out outside St Pauls is not. Is this now a protest against the opressive church? If so I think they have lost sight of what they were trying to achieve.
Link to this (Comment number 698)
Comment number 694.
Sussana30th October 2011 - 23:22
The Church is apparently trying hard to be understanding and accommodating. That is more than I think these people deserve. To offer to make the church a forum for a debate/presentation is a very generous offer indeed. If these people really want to verbally make their case, they ought to take that offer and close down the tent city.
Link to this (Comment number 694)
Comment number 685.
Amroth30th October 2011 - 23:13
The real issues which the protest is attempting to call attention to are being increasingly ignored, even trivialised. The mistakes made by the Church in handling this situation have meant that attention is being deflected away from the financial sector, playing directly into the government's hands and allowing Cameron to sit back and while the media buzz around the protesters and St. Paul's.
Link to this (Comment number 685)
Comment number 618.
John30th October 2011 - 22:10
I am angry that the City of London is turning itself into a casino, with the chips provided by an unsuspecting public. This is a shameful way of making money as a nation. As an Anglican, I am ashamed that our Church has evaded an opportunity to speak forthrightly on a crucial moral issue.
Link to this (Comment number 618)