Leaked Tube document: Could it signal real changes?

 

Tube managers say the document was for discussion only

Related Stories

Monday's big story was the leaked documents that outlined radical proposals of what the Tube could look like in a decade's time.

It included plans for more automation on the trains and the scrapping of nearly all ticket offices, as well as the closure of 1,500 posts.

London Underground (LU) denies any of this is policy.

It might not be - we won't know that for some time - but the document does give you a distinct impression of the direction the Tube is evolving.

The document talks about "a strategic plan narrative".

Union resistance

Already thanks to the upgrade, the Jubilee line is now semi-automated along with the Victoria and Central lines. The Docklands Light Railway (DLR) operates with train captains closing the doors and not drivers.

It does not take a big leap of the imagination to see train drivers' cabs being scrapped on later upgrades - the report mentions the Bakerloo.

Arguably, it would be better for the passengers although it would no doubt meet with fierce resistance from drivers' unions.

Tube train The document looks at reducing operational costs by up to 20% over the next 10 years

The big development for commuters would be the change in ticketing across London.

It's called Wave & Pay, where you use your debit card to pay for journeys and this part of the report isn't denied by LU. In fact, a trial starts on the buses using this technology next year and if it's successful expect to see it rolled out in the near future.

The report states: "A declining emphasis on ticket offices will see ticket hall staff assisting customers to purchase travel at the machines or facilitating customers to Wave & Pay with their bank cards without the need to purchase a separate ticket."

Oyster scrapped?

So, is this the beginning of the end of the Oyster card?

LU bosses told me on Monday they couldn't see the Oyster card being phased out totally - they'd probably keep it for tourists and those without bank accounts.

But if everyone switches to Wave & Pay you'd think it would only be a matter of time before the Oyster card was scrapped.

Also, a lot of people have asked me if they thought LU was perhaps testing these proposals to see how they fared.

There is a very interesting line that indicates LU knew the proposals could eventually become public: "This document... is not intended to reflect or represent any formal TfL/LUL views or policy.

"Its subject matter may relate to matters which would be subject to consultation. Its contents are confidential and should not be disclosed to any unauthorised persons."

Knowing the proposals will probably leak, and actually wanting that to happen, are two very different things.

 
Tom Edwards Article written by Tom Edwards Tom Edwards Transport correspondent, London

Cycling Superhighways: Compromise and change

Compromises are being made over plans to introduce cycle superhighways in London.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 10.

    So if I fail to "wave and pay" correctly or there is a technical glitch like those that have incorrectly penalised oyster users I can expect a maximum fare to be debited from my bank account. That'll be nice.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 9.

    This situation is of the union's own creating. They absued their monopoly powers to hold Londoners to ransom and gain above inflation pay rises and bonuses at a time when ordinary families are having to tighten their belts and see their salaries fall in real terms.

    Bob Crow has done more damage to the London economy over the years than the 7/7 bombings did.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 8.

    3. I'm no fan of Crow but surely the purpose of unions is to protect members interests, as it's the purpose of a company to cut costs to the bone, employ as few workers as possible - that's the system. The rights taken for granted now, paid leave, pensions, etc, were won by workers organising and fighting for them. We should be raising levels, not bringing them all down to the same base...

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 7.

    1. It's highly unlikely LUL would replace the drivers with a guard on each train, so who'll lead passengers to safety when the train derails (numerous times in the last couple of decades).

    2. DLR was designed/built for driver only op. Retro fitting the signal systems required to archaic LU would involve massive costs - and either the traveller or tax payer would end up footing the bill.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 6.

    I'm not happy at the thought of TfL having direct access into my Bank Account at all. Plus what happens if you swipe your wallet (as I currently do with Oyster in) and there are numerous Bank Cards in there? Does it credit all? And what about daily capping? Cart leading the horse here. Plus Tourists generally hate Oyster, they find it confusing and over-technical. They much prefer Travelcards!!

 

Comments 5 of 10

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.