Richard III dig: DNA confirms bones are king's


The skeleton is 'beyond reasonable doubt' the remains of Richard III

A skeleton found beneath a Leicester car park has been confirmed as that of English king Richard III.

Experts from the University of Leicester said DNA from the bones matched that of descendants of the monarch's family.

Lead archaeologist Richard Buckley, from the University of Leicester, told a press conference to applause: "Beyond reasonable doubt it's Richard."

Richard, killed in battle in 1485, will be reinterred in Leicester Cathedral.

Richard III graphic

Mr Buckley said the bones had been subjected to "rigorous academic study" and had been carbon dated to a period from 1455-1540.

Dr Jo Appleby, an osteo-archaeologist from the university's School of Archaeology and Ancient History, revealed the bones were of a man in his late 20s or early 30s. Richard was 32 when he died.

His skeleton had suffered 10 injuries, including eight to the skull, at around the time of death. Two of the skull wounds were potentially fatal.

One was a "slice" removing a flap of bone, the other was caused by bladed weapon which went through and hit the opposite side of the skull - a depth of more than 10cm (4ins).

'Humiliation injuries'

Dr Appleby said: "Both of these injuries would have caused an almost instant loss of consciousness and death would have followed quickly afterwards.

Who was Richard III?

The earliest surviving portrait of Richard III in Leicester Cathedral
  • Richard was born at Fotheringhay Castle in Northamptonshire, where Mary Queen of Scots was later executed
  • As Duke of Gloucester, Richard took a rampant white boar as his sign
  • His coronation took place in Westminster Abbey, in a ceremony very similar to HM the Queen's
  • Richard had one of the shortest reigns in English history - 26 months
  • He was the last English king to die in battle, killed by the forces of the future Henry VII

Source: BBC History

"In the case of the larger wound, if the blade had penetrated 7cm into the brain, which we cannot determine from the bones, death would have been instantaneous."

Other wounds included slashes or stabs to the face and the side of the head. There was also evidence of "humiliation" injuries, including a pelvic wound likely to have been caused by an upward thrust of a weapon, through the buttock.

Richard III was portrayed as deformed by some Tudor historians and indeed the skeleton's spine is badly curved, a condition known as scoliosis.

However, there was no trace of a withered arm or other abnormalities described in the more extreme characterisations of the king.

Missing princes

Without the scoliosis, which experts believe developed during teenage years, he would have been about 5ft 8ins (1.7m) tall, but the curvature would have made him appear "considerably" shorter.

Dr Appleby said: "The analysis of the skeleton proved that it was an adult male but was an unusually slender, almost feminine, build for a man.

"Taken as a whole, the skeletal evidence provides a highly convincing case for identification as Richard III."

Richard was a royal prince until the death of his brother Edward IV in 1483. Appointed as protector of his nephew, Edward V, Richard instead assumed the reins of power.

Edward and his brother Richard, known as the Princes in the Tower, disappeared soon after. Rumours circulated they had been murdered on the orders of their uncle.

Challenged by Henry Tudor, Richard was killed at Bosworth in 1485 after only two years on the throne.

DNA trail

He was given a hurried burial beneath the church of Greyfriars in the centre of Leicester.

Mr Buckley said the grave was clumsily cut, with sloping sides and too short for the body, forcing the head forward.

University of Leicester findings

Richard III's skull

• Wealth of evidence, including radiocarbon dating, radiological evidence, DNA and bone analysis and archaeological results, confirms identity of last Plantagenet king who died over 500 years ago

• DNA from skeleton matches two of Richard III's maternal line relatives. Leicester genealogist verifies living relatives of Richard III's family

• Individual likely to have been killed by one of two fatal injuries to the skull - one possibly from a sword and one possibly from a halberd

• Ten wounds discovered on skeleton - Richard III killed by trauma to the back of the head. Part of the skull sliced off

• Radiocarbon dating reveals individual had a high protein diet - including significant amounts of seafood - meaning he was likely to be of high status

• Radiocarbon dating reveals individual died in the second half of the 15th or in the early 16th Century - consistent with Richard's death in 1485

• Skeleton reveals severe scoliosis - onset believed to have occurred at the time of puberty

• Although about 5ft 8in tall (1.7m), the condition meant King Richard III would have stood significantly shorter and his right shoulder may have been higher than the left

• Feet were truncated at an unknown point in the past, but a significant time after the burial

"There was no evidence of a coffin or shroud which would have left the bones in a more compact position.

"Unusually, the arms are crossed and this could be an indication the body was buried with the wrists still tied," he added.

Greyfriars church was demolished during the Reformation in the 16th Century and over the following centuries its exact location was forgotten.

However, a team of enthusiasts and historians managed to trace the likely area - and, crucially, after painstaking genealogical research, they found a 17th-generation descendant of Richard's sister with whose DNA they could compare any remains.

Joy Ibsen, from Canada, died several years ago but her son, Michael, who now works in London, provided a sample.

The researchers were fortunate as, while the DNA they were looking for was in all Joy Ibsen's offspring, it is only handed down through the female line and her only daughter has no children. The line was about to stop.

Tomb plans

But the University of Leicester's experts had other problems.

Dr Turi King, project geneticist, said there had been concern DNA in the bones would be too degraded: "The question was could we get a sample of DNA to work with, and I am extremely pleased to tell you that we could."

She added: "There is a DNA match between the maternal DNA of the descendants of the family of Richard III and the skeletal remains we found at the Greyfriars dig.

"In short, the DNA evidence points to these being the remains of Richard III."

In August 2012, an excavation began in a city council car park - the only open space remaining in the likely area - which quickly identified buildings connected to the church.

Laurence Olivier as Richard III in the Shakespeare play of the same name Richard's villainous reputation owes much to the way he was characterised by Shakespeare

The bones were found in the first days of the dig and were eventually excavated under forensic conditions.

Details of the reburial ceremony have yet to be released, but Philippa Langley from the Richard III Society said plans for a tomb were well advanced.

She said of the discovery of Richard's skeleton: "I'm totally thrilled, I'm overwhelmed to be honest, it's been a long hard journey. I mean today as we stand it's been nearly four years.

"It's the culmination of a lot of hard work. I think, as someone said to me earlier, it's just the end of the beginning.

"We're going to completely reassess Richard III, we're going to completely look at all the sources again, and hopefully there's going to be a new beginning for Richard as well."


More on This Story

Richard III: Return of the King

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 1459.

    How I wish Geoffrey Richardson had been alive to learn this.
    Tribute to Geoffrey Richardson from Worcestershire Branch of the Richard III Society in England

  • rate this

    Comment number 1458.

    I will never, ever be able to use a car park again. (says he winking knowingly at injury lawyers for u)

  • rate this

    Comment number 1457.

    1453 Alex
    And the Scots are so pure???????????

  • rate this

    Comment number 1456.

    This is a fascinating story!
    Finding a king lost 600 years ago and then using modern technology to prove beyond doubt that it is him.
    This will encourage interest in medieval history and archaeology.
    Personally I think this is a very positive finding.
    Shame some people who use this site don't agree!

  • rate this

    Comment number 1455.

    Jurassic Car Park anyone?

  • rate this

    Comment number 1454.

    1423.reasonforit - 'Richard was a usurper and child murderer'

    LOL, been at the past lives regression therapist again?

    Shakespear need a villian, created one and gave it a familiar name. Standard dramatic device, why should anyone think it sound history? I'm glad they found him and can truky lay him at peace somewhere suitable away from school run 4x4 drivers and retail junkies.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1453.

    Thanks for the -4 so far from down south of the border! Truth hurts EH! He comes from French blood I believe! As I have said. House of Hanover! Queen Vic!

  • rate this

    Comment number 1452.

    1438 Baldybeardy; you're assuming we think univeristies should have archaeology departments.

    If this is the best they can come up with, which is afterall, just popularist 'made for tv' history perhaps they shouldn't be publicly funded.

    It's just, um, nice to know. Hard to believe that a chair in arch gets paid the same as a chair in engineering or meds...

  • rate this

    Comment number 1451.

    Without resorting to asking anyone to leave the country, can a 'royal' believer please answer this.

    These 'royals', commit quite staggering amounts of inbreeding. They try to keep the 'throne' for first borns of first borns. They also, periodically, murder others, torture others, abuse their children freely, all in the name of desperately clinging to power.

    Why ?

  • rate this

    Comment number 1450.

    Clearly the editor is not impressed by this; judging by his or her selections! I think it is great; look most of these early monarchs had a murky past Richard was no different as the major families of this country fought for the crown back then. Bosworth was no different with several families waiting on sidelines to join in the battle as it turned on the winning side. Well done the team

  • rate this

    Comment number 1449.

    How is this significant ? All it has told us is the identity of a skeliington(sic)

    Nothing about history has been changed. Mystified by the pallaver ...

  • rate this

    Comment number 1448.

    He should have anecumenical state funeral service. As for where the tomb should be sited. Why could he not in London other than Westminster. Then he could different memorial made to him?. He may have been King of England but other family members were were French or decended Florentine. At least now part of history can now revisited and facts updated. Sorry if all this bores others

  • rate this

    Comment number 1447.

    @1389. Sharon C
    "Richard III to go in Leicester Cathedral? Far too grand a place to bury the alledged killer of two little Princes I think - they should have left the twisted old goat in the car park to rot."

    I think you're confusing him with Jimmy Saville - but hey there's a space in car park now. Only a suggestion.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1446.

    Ticket must have expired ages ago - wonder if he said Anne Neville was driving?

  • rate this

    Comment number 1445.

    re 1371.Bryn Euryn. Richard the Lionheart was a terrible king. He went to war in the holy lands, costing a fortune, got kidnapped had to be bailed out, he was never here. Richard 3rd reputation based on what Henry or his advisors wanted, even other historians admit many yrs later he did away with other legal claiments to the throne when in power. Henry would have had them beheaded if diputed

  • rate this

    Comment number 1444.

    Re 1417.And your comments are typical of the shallow life you lead as a troll who believes every HYS should be based around their own agenda & woe betide anyone who differs in opinion. I suggest that if you don't like a subject stay well clear & let those of us who find this type of news interesting, alone. Well done to all those involved in this find - I think the number of posters speaks volumes

  • rate this

    Comment number 1443.

    Richard III found fit for work by ATOS.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1442.


    'Poor science'

    All that money spent on experts across the world and all they needed to do was ask you and they needn't have bothered. What a waste of money.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1441.

    NonLondonView - the only "dodgey" (sic) analysis I see here is yours. Yes, the DNA evidence on its own is not proof positive but there's a large amount of other evidence here too. Carbon dating, estimated age at time of death, potentially fatal head wounds sustained at around the time of death, the deformed spine and the location of burial are all consistent with it being Richard III too.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1440.

    I think this is really interesting and exciting. The critics who are calling him a monster and a murderer are forgetting the times that he lived in. It was common practice for monarchs to eliminate their rivals. It must also be remembered that Shakespeare wrote his play during the Tudor times and would have been currying favour from the Tudor monarchs.The same tudors who won the Battle of Bosworth


Page 7 of 79


BBC Leicester



Min. Night 15 °C


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.