European Commissioner joins row over cruise subsidies

 
Cruise ship in Southampton Southampton is one of northern Europe's busiest cruise ship ports

The European Competition Commissioner Joaquín Almunia has stepped in to the row between Liverpool and Southampton ports over cruise ships and state subsidy.

Liverpool City Council started running turnaround cruises from a temporary terminal at the end of May.

This was despite the UK government saying they should wait until Europe had agreed issues over state-funding.

Nearly £20 million was given to Liverpool on condition that the city didn't compete with existing operators in the North East and South of England.

European rules

The commissioner makes clear his displeasure at the move, saying in reply to a question by UKIP's MEP Marta Andreasen:

"The Commission has taken note of the press coverage on the City of Liverpool Cruise Terminal being used for turnaround cruises as of 29 May, 2012.

"The Commission is in contact with the United Kingdom authorities and has reminded them of their obligation to comply with EU state aid rules.

"As far as the ERDF funding is concerned, the Commission has written to the United Kingdom authorities requesting information to assess the change in use of the terminal in terms of its compliance with Article 30.4 of Council Regulation (EC) N° 1260/1999.

"Should the conditions of the ERDF initial grant offer letter no longer be complied with, a recovery of the ERDF grant might be necessary."

The move comes on the day P&O celebrates 175 years with a record seven ships departing from Southampton Port.

With 15,000 people leaving and boarding ships in one day it is the busiest day in the port's history. Many in Liverpool say they deserve a share of the booming cruise market, and could provide a more convenient departure point for people living in the Midlands and North of England.

But with most cruises heading South for the sunshine Southampton counters by pointing to the extra fuel and time involved in a more Northern departure.

And they say Liverpool Council has shown it never intended to stick to rules on funding, by pressing ahead with cruises before permission has been given.

Have Your Say

What do you think? Should there be more choice in the cruise market? Do state subsidies really mean Liverpool has an unfair advantage?

Leave your comments below.

 
Peter Henley, Political editor, South of England Article written by Peter Henley Peter Henley Political editor, South of England

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 13.

    Why not have competition, Southampton have grants for transport to access the port and Liverpool grants to develop the port itself. Will Southampton give some of the transport grant back as it benefits their port?

    Record breaking 17 liners in this week for Southampton. Good for them, Liverpool should have the opportunity to see if it is good enough to attract liners to its port.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 12.

    This is a good reason to exit the EU. They have NO reason to be sticking their noses into this. Other EU countries regularly provide their companies with contracts and so on thus subsidizing them. Start by prosecuting people like Diamond who break the rules if you want to interfere.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 11.

    Just a pity that the EU and our government are not more concerned with the slavery wages paid to stewards, waiters etc by the cruise line owners.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 10.

    Southampton wants to retain its' near monopoly on the cruising alternatives in this country - monopolies are BAD. Liverpool has pledged to pay back the UK government money given (if presented with a bill), additionally Liverpool has stated that they will pay back whatever is asked for, so if the EU rules require the money to be paid back then it will. Liverpool haven't really done anything wrong.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 9.

    For years Liverpool has relied on hundreds of millions in UK/EU regeneration aid. Cruise turnaround would ease that pressure on taxpayers. Perhaps the EU could insist Liverpool make enough money to repay funding asap? The alternative is further sizeable grants to Liverpool, costing taxpayers more in the long run. Better to get Liverpool earning its way now, & less dependent on grants later.

 

Comments 5 of 13

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.