King's Lynn incinerator plan bites the dust

 

There has been a four-year campaign to stop the incinerator being built at Saddlebow

After many years of wrangling it looks like the good people of West Norfolk have finally won their battle to stop an incinerator being built at King's Lynn.

Although council leaders have announced they're scrapping the controversial scheme, it's hardly a win-win scenario. Everyone in the county is going to have to pick up the compensation bill and what a bill it is, all £30m of it.

It's the latest twist in a political blame game. Conservatives running Norfolk County Council wanted to reduce the amount of rubbish going to landfill but they faced stiff opposition from local councillors and the North West Norfolk Conservative MP Henry Bellingham.

He said: "I am delighted with the decision. It was not value for money and not only would the costs have gone on mounting but there are other more cost-effective solutions.

Start Quote

Mr Pickles has refused to help Norfolk. We have made provision for the compensation. We have now found £18m and we need to find another £11m, although it will hurt Norfolk”

End Quote Councillor George Nobbs Labour Leader of Norfolk County Council

Contractors Cory Wheelabrator are due costs of £30m arising from the termination of the contract to build the incinerator. Mr Bellingham hopes the company will not want the full amount and believes the government will help out.

"We are going to go to the Department for Communities and Local Government to make it clear that there are ways they can be assisting - perhaps a capital interest loan to be repaid over some years. We can work with the government to try to mitigate this."

But the county council's Labour leader, George Nobbs, accused the MP of being unrealistic. He said: "This is not reality. I don't know what dream world he lives in.

"It is foolish to pretend that the company won't want compensating. They've lost millions of pounds."

Tories torn apart

The incinerator row goes back almost a decade. In 2011 a vote organised by West Norfolk council found 65,000 people in the area opposed the scheme but the county council, then led by the Conservatives, dismissed the result.

It decided to push ahead with the project, putting them at loggerheads with Conservative-run West Norfolk council.

In the same year the Tories lost 11 seats in the local elections in King's Lynn and the fight has ripped apart the Tories in Norfolk.

The wrangle claimed the scalp of the former Conservative county council leader Derek Murphy, who stood down permanently after being censured by the council's standards committee in connection with his actions over the incinerator.

Costs rise

A public inquiry was held and the planning inspector's recommendation was then passed on to the Communities and Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles.

The economics of the whole project were thrown into chaos in November by his department's decision to withdraw a £169m government grant.

Mr Pickles' planning decision, promised back in January, has been repeatedly delayed, which has cost the council dear. The scheme's value for money has reduced with each week's delay as costs rise and the contract payback period is shortened.

Mr Nobbs said: "Mr Pickles has refused to help Norfolk.

"We have made provision for the compensation. We have now found £18m and we need to find another £11m although it will hurt Norfolk."

Councillors are being urged to bite the bullet and vote to back the plans to finally terminate the contract and end this saga.

 
Deborah McGurran Article written by Deborah McGurran Deborah McGurran Political editor, East of England

East of England councils under budget pressures

Councils are under pressure to balance their books after government reveals how much they will get in income next year.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 3.

    They said over 65,000 voted in the referendum... I am always suspicious of statistics that involve 65,000 as the limit of an excel spreadsheet is 65,536... Perhaps the council truncated the results!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 2.

    This whole issue has arisen because "Officers" in the County signed a contract BEFORE they had permissions or agreements to construct. Anyone in private industry who did anything so stupid would be out on their ear within seconds! But no, this is OUR council where "Officers" are so inept they simply get promoted beyond their level of competence and we the rate payers have to foot the bill!

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 1.

    If anything, the Conservative party should be made to pay part compensation for continueing to reject the democratic choices of the local electorate.

    Why should taxpayers pay £30 million because of unwanted decision making by the Conservative party

 
 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.