Christian hotel owners' Supreme Court case in gay row starts

Peter and Hazelmary Bull Peter and Hazelmary Bull regard any sex outside marriage as a "sin"

Related Stories

Christian guesthouse owners ordered to pay damages after turning away a gay couple have begun a legal fight at the Supreme Court.

Peter and Hazelmary Bull refused civil partners Steven Preddy and Martyn Hall, from Bristol, a double room in 2008.

The court will decide whether this constituted sex discrimination, under equality legislation.

Mr and Mrs Bull, from Marazion, Cornwall, have already lost fights in a county court and the Court of Appeal.

To stay faithful to their religious beliefs, they say any sex outside marriage is ''a sin'' and deny discriminating against Mr Hall and Mr Preddy.

Appeal thrown out

Mr Hall and Mr Preddy phoned the guesthouse on 4 September 2008 to book a double room for two nights.

When they arrived the next day they were told they were not permitted to take the room, because double rooms were only allocated to married couples as opposed to those in civil partnerships.

In 2011, a judge at Bristol County Court concluded the Bulls acted unlawfully and ordered them to pay a total of £3,600 damages.

The case came to the Court of Appeal in 2012, but the Bulls' case was dismissed by judges.

At the latest hearing, five Supreme Court justices will hear legal argument over two days and are expected to reserve a decision until later.

They were told the case was about the interaction between the "social demands of equality law" and protection given to individuals under human rights law.

'Consciences clear'

Aidan O'Neill QC, representing the Bulls, said their decision was founded on a "religiously-informed judgment of conscience".

"They believe the Bible to be God's word, which reveals God's perfect standards," he said.

"They take this responsibility very seriously and always strive to keep their consciences clear before God."

He said that if they are required by law to provide double-bedded rooms to people who are not in a monogamous opposite sex marriage, then, in order to remain faithful to their beliefs, they would need to stop operating their hotel and "withdraw from providing overnight hospitality to any section of the public".

Robin Allen QC, for Mr Hall and Mr Preddy, said the couple, who are in an "established, long term and committed relationship", had "received less favourable treatment, compared to an opposite-sex couple who are married".

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

More England stories

RSS

Features

  • Two women in  JohanesburgYour pictures

    Readers' photos on the theme of South Africa


  • Worcestershire flagFlying the flag

    Preserving the identities of England's counties


  • Female model's bottom in leopard skin trousers as she walks up the catwalkBum deal

    Why budget buttock ops can be bad for your health


  • The OfficeIn pictures

    Fifty landmark shows from 50 years of BBC Two


  • French luxury Tea House, Mariage Freres display of tea pots Tea for tu

    France falls back in love with tea - but don't expect a British cuppa


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.