Planning shake-up: Time running out for local councils

 
Coventry city centre Coventry City Council has not yet had its planning plans approved

It's been variously described as "a recipe for chaos" and "a developers' charter".

Alternatively it's seen as a prescription for "sustainable development" with "strong protections" for the environment.

The government's National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) is due to come into force on Wednesday, 27 March, 12 months after it was unveiled by the Chancellor, George Osborne, in last year's budget.

And now the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) has thrown its weight behind calls for the implementation of the NPPF to be delayed by a further year because it says most councils need more time to prepare for it.

The CPRE's policy and campaigns director, Neil Sinden, warns: "The consequence of not having an adopted plan is likely to be increasing numbers of applications decided by appeal to national inspectors instead of on the basis of locally agreed plans.

"This could not only result in poorly planned developments but further delays to the planning process as well. This is the opposite of the localist approach to planning the government has promoted since the election."

Research for the Sunday Politics Midlands on BBC One has established that more than two-thirds of the councils concerned have no local plans in place.

'A mess'

Of the 34 Midlands unitary, county and metropolitan district councils required to have plans in place before the end of the month, just 11 have so far managed to do so.

They are: Dudley, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Rugby, Sandwell, Shropshire, South Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, Telford and Wrekin, Walsall, Wolverhampton and Wyre Forest.

Among those who have yet to have their plans approved by the Planning Inspectorate are three of the giant Metropolitan Districts.

One of them is Coventry, whose Labour council leader John Mutton admits it's "a mess".

'Speculative developments'

But he blames the Planning Inspectorate which turned down the city's proposed plan on the grounds that it had not secured adequate agreements from neighbouring local authorities, an interpretation which Mr Mutton hotly disputes.

"The government introduced the Localism Bill which is supposed to be about local councils making decisions based on local knowledge and then we have a planning inspector who not only ignores our local knowledge but also interprets the legislation in a way no one expected.

"The 'duty to cooperate' suddenly becomes the 'duty to agree'. Well that may never happen between authorities."

Start Quote

If those great crested newts are so rare, why do they always seem to crop up wherever you want to build anything?”

End Quote Digby, Lord Jones of Birmingham

The real danger, according to the Home Builders Federation, is that if councils do not have viable plans in place guaranteeing specific local safeguards, they risk losing control of what is built in their area.

They say the much looser NPPF would offer more scope for haphazard or unsustainable speculative developments to go ahead.

The government shows no sign of back-tracking by offering a stay of execution on the NPPF.

The Planning Minister Nick Boles reports "good progress" by those councils who have yet to have plans approved by the Planning Inspectorate:

"Up to date local plans provide certainty to both local residents and local firms, and we have offered councils a range of practical assistance to help them get up to speed.

"There are strong protections in place for the Green Belt, open countryside and areas of outstanding natural beauty when considering applications against the planning framework as a whole."

Underpinning this issue is the wider debate about our planning rules: how to preserve democratic accountability without putting an unnecessary brake on economic activity, especially job creation.

Business leaders have long demanded a relaxation. As Lord Digby Jones once memorably put it: "If those great crested newts are so rare, why do they always seem to crop up wherever you want to build anything?"

This will be one of our main talking points on the Sunday Politics from 11.00 on BBC One on Sunday 17 March 2013.

 
Patrick Burns Article written by Patrick Burns Patrick Burns Political editor, Midlands

Political chess is game of chance as end game nears

Political chess becomes a game of chance as the end game nears

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 5.

    My biggest fear (this coming from someone living in the suburbs) is that local planning laws, usually there for good reason, are about to be swept away. Ultimately we all need a good quality of life with easy access to green open spaces. If the Lord Digby Jones' of this world have their own way, as they will, many of us will end up with a very poor one.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 4.

    The urban myth of "concreting over England" is dispelled by research that shows 12.7% of the UK is "under concrete"including roads & rail. To urban dwellers it just seems that our land is built over but it really isn't .Let's have a bit more objectivity in this debate.It's better to do in-fill building and using defunct business sites for homes than spread further out into the country side.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 3.

    The population of the country has increased by about 10% over the last 15 years without a similar increase in the number of homes.
    People should not be able to object to houses nearby because they want to look out on open fields.
    However, it should not be a free for all, high buildings should not be too close to low rise housiing and adequate parking, roads and facilities need to be available.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 2.

    The UK's policy is to concrete over England to accommodate the results of the UK's policy of mass immigration into (almost exclusively) England.

    And is this midlands news or English news? Why is there no English politics section when the Scots, Welsh and Northern Irish all have their own?

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 1.

    With the mass imigration of the last 15 years we desperatly NEED more housing. This is a good policy that will help get the homes built, as well as creating jobs that the economy needs to grow. there are good provisions to protect the green belt and its a policy that aims to keep all sides happy and will be good for the UK

 
 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.