Stephen Farrow murder trial: Jury considers verdict

Betty Yates and the Reverend John Suddards Betty Yates and the Rev John Suddards were both found stabbed to death in their homes

Related Stories

A jury has retired to consider verdicts in the trial of a man accused of the murder of a retired teacher and vicar.

Stephen Farrow denies stabbing Betty Yates, 77, at her home, in Worcestershire, in January.

He has admitted the manslaughter of the Rev John Suddards, 59, the following month but denies murder.

Farrow had refused to leave jail for parts of the trial and judge Mr Justice Field told Bristol Crown Court he was "entitled to remain silent".

"Do not be prejudiced because he ignored your note asking him to attend," he told jurors.

Mrs Yates had been beaten with a walking stick and stabbed with a knife in Bewdley.

Psychopathic personality

Mr Suddards was stabbed seven times and suffered wounds to his shoulder, chest, abdomen and neck, at his vicarage in Thornbury, near Bristol.

Farrow admits killing Mr Suddards on the grounds of diminished responsibility.

The judge said that if the jury decides he did kill Mrs Yates they would then have to decide if the partial defence of diminished responsibility would apply to that death.

He said it was agreed by both the prosecution and the defence that Farrow had a psychopathic personality disorder.

It is the defence case that this abnormal mental function "substantially affected" his ability to exercise self control, he said, and it was up to the jury to decide if this had been proved.

The judge added that both psychiatrists who gave evidence in court said being a psychopath would not have affected Farrow's ability to understand the nature of his conduct or his ability to form rational judgement.

'Adept liar'

He said that it was not disputed that Farrow had told a mental health nurse after his arrest that "I killed her", and it was also agreed that the defendant was an "adept liar".

The judge said it was for the jury to decide whether that "confession" was reliable evidence of guilt.

He said it was the case of the prosecution that there were similar features in both killings; the windows were covered at Mrs Yates cottage and the vicarage, there was no forced entry of either property and both victims were stabbed.

Evidence of similarities was not enough to convict by itself, the judge said, but he asked jurors whether there were sufficient similarities for it to count as additional weight in the prosecution's case.

He added that the defence had pointed out differences such as the vicarage being ransacked but Mrs Yates' cottage was not.

The trial continues.

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

More England stories

RSS

Features

  • RihannaCloud caution

    After celebrity leaks, what can you do to safeguard your photos?


  • Cesc FabregasFair price?

    Have some football clubs overpaid for their new players?


  • Woman and hairdryerBlow back

    Would banning high-power appliances actually save energy?


  • Rack of lambFavourite feast

    Is the UK unusually fond of lamb and potatoes?


  • Members of staff at James Stevenson Flags hold a Union Jack and Saltire flag UK minus Scotland

    Does the rest of the UK care if the Scots become independent?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.