Warning of bus wars over political power grab in north

 
Buses Bus routes could be determined by councillors not companies in the future

It's been 25 years since bus services were deregulated, removing much of the power politicians had over public transport.

But now councillors in the North East may be about to grab some of that clout back.

The transport authority in Tyne and Wear is considering taking back control of bus routes, timetabling and fares.

They want to set up something called a Quality Contracts Scheme.

That would allow the councillors on the local transport authority to decide which routes they want the bus companies to run and decide how much passengers pay.

And you can understand why they want to take back some control.

Simpler fare structure?

The taxpayer currently funds almost half the cost of bus travel in Tyne and Wear, with the transport authority paying more than £60 million in subsidy to the private companies.

Queue at bus stop Supporters of quality contracts argue passengers would get a greater say over fares and routes

But despite paying out that money, the councillors from the authority have almost no influence when routes are withdrawn or fares raised.

And as funding cuts bite, the Tyne and Wear transport authority fears it will be powerless to stop vital routes being lost.

Instead the bus firms will call all the shots.

But under quality contracts, the transport authority would decide which routes are run and then open them up to tender.

The transport authority would pay a set amount to the bus operator, but keep the proceeds from the fares.

Start Quote

Bernard Garner

We need a system that is easier to use and to understand”

End Quote Bernard Garner Chief executive, Nexus

The authority argues it could then set the fares to allow popular services to cross-subsidise the less profitable, socially valuable routes that are currently so vulnerable.

It also says the change would allow it to introduce a much simpler fare structure to replace the dozens of different charges made by competing bus firms.

Bernard Garner, from Nexus - the publicly-owned company which runs the transport system - believes the change will benefit passengers.

He said: "We need a system that is easier to use and to understand - a comprehensive network not just a series of individual services.

"And it needs to deliver value for money - both for passengers and for the council tax payers who put a lot of money into bus services."

Massive subsidy

The bus companies don't like the idea though.

They believe some routes could end up needing massive subsidy, and that the system could fall apart if the network doesn't get the projected number of passengers.

The North East Bus Operators Association says that would leave the taxpayer facing an even bigger bill at a time when the money simply isn't there.

Start Quote

Greg Stone

I think the way we're going is going to lead to a war between the transport authorities and the bus companies”

End Quote Cllr Greg Stone Liberal Democrat, Newcastle

And Sir Brian Souter, chief executive of Stagecoach, has even said he would rather "take poison" than hand over control of bus services to the politicians.

Legal action by the bus operators is a distinct possibility.

Some then are calling for a different solution.

Newcastle Liberal Democrat Greg Stone, who sits on the transport authority, believes a voluntary agreement with the bus companies offers a better way forward.

He says some politicians have a rose-tinted view of the age before deregulation.

He said: "A voluntary partnership arrangement between the public and private sectors would lead to better results for both sides on this.

"I think the way we're going is going to lead to a war between the transport authorities and the bus companies.

"That will only end up hurting the passenger in terms of the cost to the taxpayer."

Avoiding competition

But some believe the bus companies have too cosy a life at the moment.

A recent Transport Select Committee report accused North East bus companies of having a "non-aggression pact", effectively avoiding competition in some areas.

One North East Labour MP believes quality contracts could tackle that.

Houghton and Sunderland South's Bridget Phillipson said: "What this system would deliver is greater transparency about how money's being spent, but it would also give local people more of a voice.

"At the moment they are frustrated that there isn't one simple ticketing system, and that they don't have a say when routes are cut."

She has already gathered 1,500 signatures supporting her campaign for quality contracts to be introduced.

The members of the Tyne and Wear authority will make a decision on whether to adopt the new system later in September.

But if they do, that may just be the start of a protracted battle between companies and councillors about who should be in charge of the bus network.

 
Richard Moss, Political editor, North East & Cumbria Article written by Richard Moss Richard Moss Political editor, North East & Cumbria

Osborne's northern powerhouse pledge

The Chancellor wants to create a northern powerhouse through railways, science and mayors but can he deliver?

Read full article

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 9.

    This wont work.It takes a lot to run a bus company.I am not in the bus industry ,why cant the the Tyne and Wear set up their own bus company like Cardiff ,Newport and Reading buses.That way they will have control ,instead of forcing bus companies to their ideas.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 8.

    Only bus routes that are unprofitable get subsidies. You can't have it both ways either strip the companies of subsidies and let them drop unprofitable services or accept that subsidies are necessary to keep routes open. Next time you travel on a rural route have a good look around at how many people on these buses are pensioners travelling free. Bus companies get reimbursed 33% of a standard fare

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 7.

    Another example of so called private enterprise that turns out to be relying on taxpayers money - and delivering poor value.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 6.

    With all the recent rail hoo-haa between Virgin and First, coupled with the ever growing anger of rail users, are we witnessing the first steps towards renationalisation of public transport in the UK? Are people beginning to wake up to the Thatcherite lies about privatistion? The post-war consensus lasted 34 years, and next year is 34 years since Thatcher's victory..time for a new era?

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 5.

    Quality Contracts are a way to back door re regulation. As it stands a Voluntary Agreement similar to the South Yorkshire one is proving very successful for all concerned. 1.5m extra passengers and a universal ticketing system. Qaulity Contracts can if not negotiated properly drive down standards for the employees as cash strapped councils opt for the cheapest tender.

 

Comments 5 of 9

 

Features

  • NS Savannah, 1962Nuclear dream

    The ship that totally failed to change the world


  • Irvine WelshScots missed

    Five famous Scots who can't vote in the Scottish referendum


  • Balloons flying upUp, up and away

    Why the ever rising pound is not all good news


  • Espresso cup7 days quiz

    Which city serves the strongest cup of coffee?


  • Jean-Luc CourcoultGiant strides

    The enigmatic Frenchman behind Liverpool's 25ft grandmother


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.