Public inquiry over incinerator plan

Kings Lynn Plans for a £500 million waste incinerator in King's Lynn have led to a public inquiry

A ceasefire has been called in the two year battle over the plans for a waste incinerator in King's Lynn.

The Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has ordered a public inquiry into the £500 million scheme.

It will now be up to him rather than local councillors to decide if it should go ahead.

"We will now get a fair hearing which is what we've always wanted," says the MP for North West Norfolk, Henry Bellingham.

"Everyone will have a chance to put over their point of view."

Contentious plans

More than 65,000 people voted against the plans in a referendum and 6,000 individuals wrote letters to the Secretary of State complaining.

"DCLG has had more letters about this than any other application," says the neighbouring MP for South West Norfolk, Elizabeth Truss.

Start Quote

Elizabeth Truss

This was clearly a contentious issue and it's right the plan was called in”

End Quote Elizabeth Truss MP

"This was clearly a contentious issue and it's right the plan was called in."

What worried Norfolk's MPs and upset campaigners was a feeling that they were not being listened to.

"It was a farce," says Mr Bellingham.

He described how, at the planning meeting: "Objectors were treated with contempt, people were sneered and jeered at by county councillors."

"You cannot force a project of this size through when so many people are against it," he added.

"You can't defy local democracy."

Alternative technologies

The County Council, which insists that everyone has had a fair hearing, has also welcomed the decision to call in the plans.

"This has been a controversial project and people will welcome the extra layer of scrutiny that the Secretary of State will give," says Councillor Bill Borrett, the Cabinet member for the environment and waste.

He still believes the incinerator, which would turn waste into energy, is a good idea.

"The purpose of this project is to benefit the people of Norfolk. We are trying to save £8 million a year to deal with rubbish which won't harm the environment and will save the County Council money."

"We're not in this to upset or inconvenience people in any way."

Calling a public inquiry will result in a significant delay, which could cost the council money in penalty clauses.

Mr Bellingham is already using the delay to call on the council to think again: "Incineration is yesterday's technology. It's going out of fashion on the continent and in the USA.

"There are modern alternative technologies available which don't damage people's health.

"The county council should stop flogging a dead horse, it should drop the plans, admit it made a mistake and go back to the drawing board."

Conservatives split

But Bill Borrett disagrees, pointing out that the plans have received the backing of the Treasury and the Environment Agency.

"When I first heard about it sounded like a terrible project as well but when you look into it, you will see that there are similar plants up and running and there are no local outcries."

As well as upsetting local people, these plans have divided the Conservative party in Norfolk.

The day after Mr Pickles' decision, the Conservative leader, Derrick Murphy, faced a vote of no confidence from councillors in his own party.

He easily survived it but it's a sign of how much bad blood has been caused over this issue.

The ceasefire may provide enough time to heal a few wounds.

Deborah McGurran Article written by Deborah McGurran Deborah McGurran Political editor, East of England

East of England councils under budget pressures

Councils are under pressure to balance their books after government reveals how much they will get in income next year.

Read full article

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 7.

    "You can't defy local democracy" means that "There are no private property rights". If a so-called 'majority' wants to do something to your property, then that majority can do as it pleases. Under this "tyranny of democracy" all you need is 51% of the population to vote to steal the wealth of the other 49%, and according to "democracy" that's fine. Tyranny is when democracy trumps property rights.

  • rate this

    Comment number 6.

    Cameron talks of localism to give local people more say, now he wants to ‘cut through the dither’ because they're holding up the bulldozers. Our local government fails to act honestly, openly and transparently, local people have no way of making them act responsibly and solely in the public interest. Until this is redressed, there can be no democracy or localism, bitter conflict will remain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    CW chose the site, which NCC had just bought, in a Flood Zone 3, 500 meters or so from the River Ouse and Nar. An FOI email between the Directors at NCC & DEFRA said the contract for 170,000 tons (268,000 capacity), allowed for further recycling. The non-contract waste from other counties gives a twist to the 'proximity principle'. There's no CHP customer now Palm Paper have finally confirmed it.

  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    Having seen FOI emails it's quite apparent Norfolk County Council wouldn't have got the PFI without the inside help of DEFRA officials, who also control the Environment Agency's decision, who have helped CW's application. Not to mention the Health Protection Agency's 'turn a blind eye' policy, copied by the Director of Public Health for Norfolk. How deep does this collusion run - et tu Mr Pickles?

  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    If it is for the benefit of Norfolk as a whole, why is it being built on the edge of the County. The fine City of Norwich is pretty central has a river for cooling water. I am sure the people there would love all the jobs promised. Or maybe to many of the schemes supporters live there and do not wamt to risk the health of there loved ones


Comments 5 of 7



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.