Public to choose between tax rises and benefit cuts

Birmingham Council House Birmingham council is to launch a consultation over council tax rises, benefit cuts or a mix of both

It may seem like choosing between the devil and the deep blue sea.

But these are the options Birmingham's controlling Labour group will be putting to the city's 400,000 council tax payers in a mass consultation exercise due to begin in September.

It's been triggered by a government scheme, due to come into force next April.

This will require local authorities to take direct responsibility for council tax benefits, and to take a 10% cut in the grants they receive from Whitehall to fund them.

In Birmingham's case this would equate to savings of £12 million.

The sheer size of this £3.5 billion per year authority means that it is here that the impact is heaviest.

The city also has a high concentration of people on low incomes.

Blame game

The council blames not one, but two Conservative/Liberal Democrat administrations: the government, of course, and also the city's own coalition which was in charge for eight years until this year's local elections.

Birmingham's Labour Leader, Councillor Sir Albert Bore, had already accused his predecessors of leaving a budgetary 'black hole'.

The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats replied that the real 'black hole' was the national deficit left by the previous Labour government.

They said that this was driving this entire deficit reduction process, including cuts to council tax benefits which had more than doubled since 1997.

Sir Alfred Bore Councillor Sir Albert Bore had accused his predecessors of leaving a budgetary 'black hole'

Now the council is appealing to the Communities and Local Government Department to defer the cut.

It says it will do its best to protect families with young children, or with elderly and disabled people.

But inevitably, it says, some of the city's poorest people would be hit.

A logical deduction would indicate young, single adults.

Charities including the YMCA are warning that homelessness, especially among young people, is bound to increase as a result.

However unpalatable this may seem for a new Labour administration, the alternative looks even bleaker.

Raising council tax would herald a chorus of Conservative and Liberal Democrat 'I told you so's'.

And under the Localism Act, any council tax increase of 3.5% or more would require a referendum.

So what are the chances that the government will be persuaded to back down and grant Birmingham a stay of execution?

Remote, I'd say.

Tough choices

The Department for Communities and Local Government wants local authorities generally to take direct responsibility for easing the burden on taxpayers of benefits which they say have been spiralling for too long.

In doing so, it believes councils would be forced to buy-in to the government's message that 'work must always pay': that anyone who can work and can find it, should do so and should be appreciably better-off than they would be claiming benefits.

The government also believes this approach chimes with public opinion: recent surveys suggested the benefit reforms enjoyed approval ratings of up to 60%.

Dustbin men The government's message is that 'work must always pay'

All of which leaves Birmingham's new Labour cabinet facing what it calls "tough choices".

That is a view disputed by a leading member of the Conservative opposition group.

Councillor Randal Brew told us benefit cuts and council tax increases were "unnecessary".

He said the council should instead explore radical new and more efficient ways of working and raising income.

Some neighbouring local authorities are already pursuing ambitious strategies for sharing services and pooling resources.

Bromsgrove and Redditch Councils now have one chief executive between them.

Ministers are convinced councils have a long way to go yet in teasing-out further synergies and efficiencies.

Now that we know deficit reduction will remain a way of life until well into the next Parliament, whichever government comes in after the 2015 election, the one thing we can be sure of, whatever our politics, is that local services will look very different in five years' time than they did five years ago.

Patrick Burns Article written by Patrick Burns Patrick Burns Political editor, Midlands

Election 2015: Targets, switches and swings

Targeting, switching and swinging in Midlands numbers game as election draws near.

Read full article


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 8.

    Trust the Government to take away or impact anything that a normal person could use or need.
    How about you tell the banks to start lending money again and bring us out of the recession isted of robbing the poor to find the rich !!!

  • rate this

    Comment number 7.

    A local income tax sounds like a fair system but without some redistribution system it would bear more heavily on poorer local authority areas. Imagine the money collected by a 1p income tax in Solihull; compare that to what would collected in say Ladywood. The spending power of Solihull would be greater than Ladywood. You would have to have some equalisation scheme, hence Revenue Support Grant.

  • rate this

    Comment number 6.

    Choose between tax rises and benefit cuts?

    Surely there should be a "third way" a well managed and innovative economic plan to balance the UK's books and promote growth?

    Present political parties, all, are in the pockets of lobbyists e.g. new energy policy - protects big business and profits and places any extra energy costs onto consumers and tax payers.

    Instead of giving consumers a break!

  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    Peter sums up the situation admirably.It's unfortunate the one useful idea the Liberal party has,replacing council tax with a local income tax,has never been considered.I suspect most council tax payers would approve of a reduction in the ability of the idle poor (not those incapable,but those workshy)paying their whack for the services they have most time to enjoy.

  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    As one of those who is happy to pay my fair share of National taxation whether it be the current 20% or the 33% of bygone years, I would not be prepared to pay 1p of additional local taxation which is an unfair tax brought in to protect the rich and the very rich from paying their fair share - thanks to the council tax freeze I am currently paying around 10% of my total income - not 1p more!


Comments 5 of 8



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.