Government delays decision on aviation policy

 
Airplane The government has delayed its decision on aviation policy until autumn 2012

So, with baited breath we waited. Initially the government announced the aviation review, looking at options to increase airport capacity in the South East would be published in the Spring.

Then it was delayed for around five months until the summer.

I was told, by the Transport Secretary Justine Greening herself, she was ready to go and it would be published before the parliamentary summer recess.

Then, I was told by reliable sources it would be published this week - probably Thursday.

Well, the Department for Transport has published its Aviation Policy Framework today which includes some measures to increase capacity in the short term.

It includes the possibility of new rules to limit the use of smaller planes - in favour of larger ones - at the busiest airports.

UK's hub status

A statement from the Department for Transport also commits "up to £500 million" towards a western rail link to Heathrow which, it is claimed, will shave 30 minutes off train journey times to Heathrow from the west of England and south Wales.

Start Quote

Justine Greening

A separate call for evidence on how to maintain the UK's international connectivity and hub status will follow later this year”

End Quote Justine Greening Transport Secretary

But, despite increasing calls from business leaders, including Willie Walsh and Richard Branson, in recent weeks for the government to commit to plans to increase airport capacity and maintain the UK's hub status, we are no nearer knowing how that will be achieved.

Justine Greening says "A separate call for evidence on how to maintain the UK's international connectivity and hub status will follow later this year once the industry has had time to consider the measures in today's consultation."

I think industry leaders and residents in areas which would be affected by plans to build a new Thames Estuary airport, for example, or the building of new runways at existing sites, feel the time for consultation has passed and really just want a decision.

So, why is the government stalling on this?

U-turn?

Backbench MPs tell me that after the "omnishambles" over Lords reform in which the government suffered its biggest defeat to date the coalition is simply not up for another fight - this time over airports.

There are signs that senior Tories, including the Chancellor, are considering a U-turn over Heathrow and would be prepared to consider a third runway.

Plane in sky Up in the air? The government says it is important to wait to get aviation policy decisions right

That is an absolute no-no for their Liberal Democrat colleagues.

The Prime Minister's spokesman today said: "We will get on with this. These are important long term decisions and we need to get them right.

"What today's announcement does is set out the context for the call for evidence."

He added: "It is important that we take decisions in the light of the evidence."

Of course, it's important to get these decisions right but making no decision at all can also be damaging to confidence in the UK's economy - and the government's reputation.

 
Louise Stewart, Political editor, South East Article written by Louise Stewart Louise Stewart Political editor, South East

Estuary airport rejection no surprise

Political editor Louise Stewart looks at the political fallout from the decision to reject plans for an estuary airport.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 8.

    If they are thinking about building a airport in the Thames, why don't they expand Manston instead, cheaper, good road and rail link, a faction of the cost.

    No one in Kent wants Boris Island, but loads wants to expand Manston including people in Thanet.

    3rd runway at Heathrow is a non-starter as no air space for extra planes.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 7.

    So, because the lib dems are opposing extra capacity at Heathrow on environmental grounds, because we should be reducing domestic and near continental flights in favour of rail due to climate change, instead the government are considering still adding extra airport capacity but also destroying internationally important wetlands.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 6.

    Why do the authorities simply ban night landings and take offs at LGW and LHR during 12.00 and 06.30. Aircraft operations will continue to increase but at least this would give thos who sufferon the ground some respite.. At least that would indicate some sympathy with thoaw on the ground who have to put up with aircraft noise.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 5.

    All this talk of new runways and airports when there's one airport that is used for cargo flights, that is definitely under capacity and would bring greater prosperity to an area that is suffering the worst effects of the recession - Manston. Why is it so frequently ignored?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 4.

    Are we going to retire from the world and become a decaying island with deflating wealth...or do we fight to hold onto our position, take some pain and keep re-generating our infrastructure and industries? Cameron is high on rhetoric but low on action. If we want the latter we need to move now on the Heathrow 3rd runway and already be thinking long term about the Boris Island.

 

Comments 5 of 8

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.