New rail/road 'inland port' to boost East Mids economy?


Opponents of the plans say it will bring even more road traffic to the area

Related Stories

They're a feature of many motorway junctions these days; I'm referring to the enormous warehouses that are the new growth industry of UK plc.

The latest is planned for farmland by junction 24 of the M1 near East Midlands Airport.

But this development is more ambitious than most. The 6m sq ft site would be served by a new railway.

Freight brought into the UK via Felixstowe, Hull or the Channel ports would arrive into the proposed distribution centre and the economic heart of the East Midlands region by rail, rather than road.

Some residents near the airport aren't convinced. They've raised concerns during consultation meetings with local politicians.

But Roxhill Developments of Rugby, the company behind the project, is upbeat. One of its directors, Kate Bedson, told me about its rail interchange ambitions.

"This site will act like an inland port for the goods that are coming in from oversees and Europe," she said.

"Our evidence suggests it should generate 6,000 jobs."

Start Quote

This scheme will link both rail and air transport at East Midlands Airport. It already handles the second largest amount of air freight in the UK and the opportunity of adding rail to it will be of huge strategic advantage for the region”

End Quote Martin Traynor Leicestershire Chamber of Commerce

An existing freight rail line linking Nottingham and Birmingham would be extended to the proposed site.

The developers also talk up the benefits for M1 motorists.

"Junction 24 is very important for the region, but it's almost up to capacity," she added.

"There'll be improvements to M1 junctions in the area and a new bypass for Kegworth. All of this will ease the road network and make it easier to get freight here on the railway," added Ms Bedson.

And that sort of talk is attracting influential backing.

"It's an opportunity for us," said Martin Traynor, chief executive of the Leicestershire Chamber of Commerce.

"This scheme will link both rail and air transport at East Midlands Airport. It already handles the second largest amount of air freight in the UK and the opportunity of adding rail to it will be of huge strategic advantage for the region."

Conservative MP for Leicestershire North West, Andrew Bridgen, has a dilemma weighing the concerns of local residents and the project's economic potential.

"It would put over £10m of business rates into the local council. We also need jobs and the investment. That's a major factor," said the MP.

At a time of recession and a lack of employment opportunities, the prospect of 6,000 new jobs, you would have thought, would be welcomed with open arms. But not in the villages of Lockington and Hemington, which could have the rail freight interchange on their doorstep.

Start Quote

I don't think for a minute there'll be 6,000 new jobs. The unemployment here is very low, so there's little benefit for us there”

End Quote Toni Harrington Hemington parish councillor

"I don't think for a minute there'll be 6,000 new jobs," said Hemington parish councillor Toni Harrington

"Unemployment here is very low, so there's little benefit for us there. But there'll be 6,000 people in their cars coming here and we are already under strain with one of the busiest motorway junctions in the country," she added.

Another villager opposed to the scheme is Peter Hill.

"We'll be completely ring-fenced by a railway system and with continual 24/7 freight traffic movement. The noise and light pollution will be unacceptable," he told me.

The government wants a national network of rail interchanges like this to take more freight off the roads.

Indeed, Transport Secretary Justine Greening says the government is taking measures to "unblock" obstacles. By that she means using planning powers to approve transport infrastructure schemes deemed to be of national significance.

"I'm a supporter of the government's policy for rail interchanges. It'll help to get freight off the road. It's good for the environment and good for business," added Andrew Bridgen.

The proposed junction 24 rail freight interchange is set to be an unwelcome neighbour for residents. They say the go-ahead is not yet a done deal. But the economic case may prove too powerful and persuasive for government ministers to ignore.

John Hess Article written by John Hess John Hess Political editor, East Midlands

General Election 2015: Economy will be key to predicting East Midlands results

Why the performance of the economy is crucial in predicting the General Election results in the East Midlands this year.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 8.

    I agree with Mr Spence in a big way for the economic argument - the improvements to the local economy can be acheived by spreading the wealth - this site does not have to be here, we can benefit as a whole by having a broader view -we are not against this in principle - purely the location - Mr Spence would do well for his party to speak with us - you know where we are :)

  • rate this

    Comment number 7.

    It is, of course, imperative that neighbour concerns are comprehensively addressed but the overall benefits to NWL are massive. We have a real opportunity to significantly improve the local economy, bring widespread training opportunities to young people and improve public transport infrastructure to the district. It's an opportunity we cannot and should not reject.

  • rate this

    Comment number 6.

    Mr Spence is also entitled to his view, there are many sites available which are more suitable than the one in question here. In addition given that we are on the edge of the district, the job opportunities will not necessarily be all NWL - the only carrot for the district is the 10m business rates - There are other things to consider

  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    As Leader of the Labour Group on North West Leicestershire District Council I have written about this issue here:

  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    I am quoted in this article as Hemington Parish Councillor - I speak only as a resident of Hemington. I am fully supportive of the Government initiative on SRFI - this quality Farmland is not the right location - NW Leics have ignored previous consultation and Mr Bridgen would do well to consider the wider view. Not a done deal yet!!

  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    It used to be called Toton - just up the line from EM Parkway - but that was rail only. I think it was the biggest rail concentration yard in Europe but presumably became redundant following the collapse of the coal industry and move of freight from rail to road.
    The Toton site still seems to be available and is only 500m from Junction 25 of the M1 with the A52.

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    The concept is great. Is there another location in this area to reduce the local issues. Also needs a new rail link direct to/ channel tunnel to take lorries off M1 /M25 and directly thorough tunnel - a more cost effective solution than widening road

  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    Do these people that like this idea, live in the villages of Lockington or Hemington like I do. I bet if they did they would not like the idea of having a train line and sidings being built with a 1/2 mile of their house.



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.