Can the north gain a golden legacy from 2012 Olympics?

 
Crowds celebrating in Trafalgar Square Will the Olympics deliver a lasting legacy outside London?

Related Stories

Now first let me declare an interest. I am generally an Olympic enthusiast.

I'll be glued to everything from archery to freestyle wrestling through July and August, and I've even watched the BBC's Olympic torchcam on a regular basis.

And yes, since you ask, I do actually possess some Olympic tickets.

But as a journalist, I have to ask a key question - will the Olympics really bring the benefits to the whole country that some have claimed?

Far from London

Let's take the region where I live and examine the case.

The North East and Cumbria is about as far from London as you can get in England.

But we have been told that this is an event that will benefit even the most far-flung parts of the country.

And there are some tangible benefits you can point to in the north.

The North East has its own slice of the Olympics as some of the football will be played at St James' Park.

But that is an event you can certainly get tickets for still.

When I last went on the ticketing website, you could buy up to 30 tickets a time for the games there.

It seems unlikely then that the football there will draw anywhere near as many people, or generate as much revenue as the average month of a Premiership season, even if it will see St James' Park in use in July and early August.

Training camps

There are though some competitors who will be basing their training camps in the North East, bringing some economic benefits.

Olympic rings on Tyne Bridge The Olympic rings are on Newcastle's Tyne Bridge but will there be a lasting legacy for the North East?

Some of Sri Lanka's athletes will be in Durham, the Grenadan team will be based at Sunderland University, and there will be Colombian competitors in Gateshead.

There are businesses which have also gained economically from the Olympics.

The Olympic Delivery Authority estimates that North East companies have won between £120 million and £150 million worth of contracts.

That looks pretty puny compared to the £2 billion of contracts won by firms in the South East.

But compared to the £150 million won by the larger North West, £75 million won by Yorkshire and Humber, and £38 million won by Wales, it's not too shabby.

But scratch below the surface of the list I have seen of the North East's contracts and you might wonder how much of the work Barclaycard and British Telecom classed as being from the region has actually flowed into the local economy.

Vital work

Nevertheless for some the work has been vital.

Sotech in Peterlee supplied some of the guttering and fascia for the Aquatics Centre and the athletes' village, and the work was extremely useful.

Like so many, the firm was struggling with the credit crunch in 2008, so when the Olympic contracts landed, the timing couldn't have been better.

Olympic Aquatics Centre Work on the Olympic Aquatics Centre in London helped to boost jobs at a company in Peterlee

The company is now growing again and employs more people than it did four years ago.

Managing Director John Egginton said: "We had just moved into a new factory and expanded the business when the recession struck and we ended up having to lay 11 staff off.

"The year after, the Olympic work came in. Even though the recession had started we knew that work was coming so it gave you that confidence to keep going. It did help tremendously."

For other companies though the Olympics might not be such great news.

Tourism businesses in Cumbria have seen a drop in bookings from Japanese and Chinese visitors as they choose to go to London or stay away altogether.

They also fear more people will stay at home to watch the Olympics rather than head for the Lakes.

Olympic organisers hope that the games will boost all UK tourism in the long term, but it will be hard to prove whether that really will benefit the north in years to come.

Lake District scenery There are fears that the Olympics could lead to fewer tourists visiting the Lake District

So that brings us to another key part of the supposed Olympic legacy - the idea that it will boost participation in sport and create a new healthy generation of young people.

On that I'm afraid there isn't much solid good news.

There is no evidence that sporting participation has risen in any of the countries which have hosted the games.

And in recent years the number of people engaging in sport in the UK has shown little sign of being boosted by the Olympics.

Broadly the figure has flatlined.

It might take more than the Olympics then to cure the country's obesity problems.

Grassroots sport

And there are some who suggest the games might even have damaged grassroots sport by diverting funds away from local clubs and into the Olympics.

Start Quote

Ian Lavery MP

If the Olympics are £500 million under budget, why not distribute the money to facilitate sports projects in the most deprived areas in the UK?”

End Quote Ian Lavery MP Labour, Wansbeck

Ian Lavery, the Labour MP for Wansbeck in Northumberland, has raised concerns about the loss of money for community projects.

He believes that cash now needs to come back, especially as the Olympics have come in around £500 million under budget.

In a tweet he said: "If the Olympics are £500 million under budget, why not distribute the money to facilitate sports projects in the most deprived areas in the UK?"

There is though one other tangible difference the Olympics will make in the North East and Cumbria. We'll all be able to shop later on a Sunday during the games as the trading laws are temporarily relaxed.

The change will allow large shops and businesses around the Olympic venues to trade for more than the usual six hours, but because the law has had to be varied nationally, the same relaxation will apply across England.

For some shoppers and larger businesses that might be welcome, for some workers and smaller shops, it might not be so welcome.

Olympic torch

So if I'm being honest, it's hard to make a cast-iron case for a golden Olympic legacy in the North East and Cumbria.

But then you turn on the TV or surf the web to watch the progress of the Olympic torch.

You see crowds lining the streets in the teeming rain, the thrilled faces of the torch carriers, and you realise there are benefits which are harder to measure but are most definitely there.

You can't cash in memories; they don't create jobs, they don't push people to be more active, but in decades to come there will be people who treasure the moment they were part of an Olympic summer.

You see I warned you I was an enthusiast.

 
Richard Moss, Political editor, North East & Cumbria Article written by Richard Moss Richard Moss Political editor, North East & Cumbria

Osborne's northern powerhouse pledge

The Chancellor wants to create a northern powerhouse through railways, science and mayors but can he deliver?

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 4.

    The Olympic legacy to the South will be debt, tax payer funded white elephants, infrastructure sold at knock down prices to property developers, traffic chaos and a massive rise in council tax.

    The North just gets the debt.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 3.

    Elite sport is a moronic activity which requires expensive facilities and is bad for the health of participants.
    The Olympics will do little for places outside London. It's a waste of money and an ego-trip for Coe and Blaiir.
    Who cares are far someone can throw a discus?
    Better to go for a walk, a cycle ride or weight-train with dumbells at home, which costs little and is good for you..
    Alan

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 2.

    London will pay for infrastructure in the Northeast when they need a supply of water from the Chinese owned Northumbria Water.

    Those with memories may remember the promises of rail terminals throughout the land as a sop to the investment in the Channel Tunnel.

    The taxpayer ended up funding the tunnel. Nothing else was built.

    We'll always end up also rans.
    With import terminals and smog.
    Cough

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 1.

    Ian Lavery is right if the Olympics is £500 million that money should be spent in the north east as there is not direct effect for the north east with the uk hosting the Olympics. However this government will spend it in the south east because the north east does not matter to this government.

 
 

Features

  • VigoroAnyone for Vigoro?

    The bizarre Edwardian attempt to merge tennis and cricket


  • ScissorsTwo more years

    How the UK's life expectancy changes without Scotland


  • Payton McKinnonLeft behind

    Why do so many children die in hot cars?


  • Dr Mahinder Watsa Dr Sex

    The wisecracking 90-year-old whose agony column is a cult hit


  • White Rhino, KenyaSky rangers

    How drones may be used to fight wildlife poaching in Africa


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.