Citizens' jury debates if MPs are value for money

 
The George Hotel overlooked by Huddersfield's most famous politician Harold Wilson The historic George Hotel overlooked by Huddersfield's most famous politician Harold Wilson

The George Hotel in Huddersfield has a reputation for making history over pay.

In 1895 it was where 21 clubs met to form the professional Rugby League allowing players to be paid for the first time.

This week there was another groundbreaking meeting about how much a high profile group is worth.

For the first time a 40-strong official 'Citizens' Jury' gathered to deliver a verdict on the pay and pensions of MPs.

MPs can draw little comfort from the results of their deliberations which can be summarised as follows:

  • Over a third of the jury thought MPs pay should be cut immediately;
  • 59% said the current salary of almost £66,000 is "about right";
  • Just one person said they should have an increase in salary;
  • Virtually all had concerns about the perceived "perks" of the job.
Recovering reputations
Citizens Jury on MPs pay meets in Huddersfield The Citizens' Jury on MPs' pay meets in Huddersfield

MPs should not be tightening their belts just yet because the Huddersfield citizens' jury verdict is not in any way binding.

However, it will be a powerful piece of evidence for the new body which has been set up to decide how much MPs will be paid in future.

IPSA, the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, emerged from the reputational wreckage of the scandal of MPs' expenses.

Self-regulation, with MPs themselves voting on expenses, pay and pensions was clearly not going to be acceptable any longer.

Since 2009 IPSA has set up a more transparent framework for MPs' expenses and is now looking at putting in place a formula for future levels of MPs' pay and pensions.

"For the first time in history the public will have a voice on MPs' pay," I was told by Ken Olisa.

He is one of the five-strong board of IPSA which will make the final binding decision next spring.

IPSA's Ken Olisa Ken Olisa says the public will have a voice on MPs' pay for the first time in history

"That is why it is important we ask as many of them as possible to participate."

Huddersfield will play a pivotal role in this because it is the only town in the North picked to hold a citizens' jury.

Just one other will be held in the south of England.

"Why Huddersfield?", said Ken.

"It has a strong liberal tradition; it is an important community in West Yorkshire; and its profile is a good cross section of society."

 
Len Tingle, Political editor, Yorkshire Article written by Len Tingle Len Tingle Political editor, Yorkshire

European musical chairs in Yorkshire

Len Tingle reflects on the remarkable game of musical chairs which has taken place among MEPs in the Yorkshire and Humber constituency since the last European polls.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 17.

    There are too many MPs. I havent seen or heard from mine in years. Apparently our constituency is called Hellaby (which is an industrial estate between Maltby and Rotherham). the Lib dems never put an councillor up for election. Labour never get voted out and the roads are a mess and they have borrowed heavily to build themselves new offices. If MPs guard politics, who watches the MPs. No VFM

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 16.

    We should take this with a grain of salt. Huddersfield's "profile is a good cross section of society" but can the same be said of the "Citizen's Jury"?

    And to choose only two towns out of the dozens, if not hundreds, that are the same size as, if not larger than, Huddersfield makes mockery of the whole exercise.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 15.

    MPs pay is the least of the problems with Parliament. It long ago (if it ever did) ceased to be a place of democracy. That needs to be reformed and we live in a technological age now where true 'Athenian' democracy could easily be brought to the masses. MPs will never allow this of course as power is never given away willingly by those who have it.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 14.

    Put them all on Job Seekers allowance and make them do unpaid work to earn it. Maybe then they'll have an idea what the real world is all about.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 13.

    There are just too many of them. Pay them as now, reduce expenses, as suggestions above but reduce their number. Where the whips insist on the party vote, we might as well just count the votes in proportion to the number of MPs for each party & at least save some money. Or how about single combat between the 2 principles: that'd be entertaining.

 

Comments 5 of 17

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.