Shire counties press for new funding deal for schools

 
Michael Gove Education Secretary Michael Gove agrees that the current funding system needs an overhaul

The Education Secretary Michael Gove may need to brush up on his maths.

He set some homework for Ivan Ould, the Leicestershire politician who represents the f40 group of local education authorities.

He lobbies for those English counties that claim unfairness in the current complex system of allocating education funding.

His own authority, Conservative-run Leicestershire County Council, has found itself at the bottom of the education funding league table for a number of years.

Funding challenge

Councillor Ould held talks last week with Michael Gove at the Department for Education.

It was out of their head-to-head that the Education Secretary issued his funding challenge.

So at Leicestershire's County Hall, Ivan Ould - with calculator in hand - has been working out an alternative system of school funding.

Start Quote

Pupils in exam hall

If the Department for Education can find the cash for its pupil premium scheme and other projects, it can certainly afford this”

End Quote Cllr Ivan Ould Leicestershire County Council

His own proposals are now on their way to the Education Secretary to plug an increasingly controversial funding gap between our city and county schools.

It matters: funding is allocated to each pupil based on a series of social, education and deprivation factors.

So in Leicestershire, each pupil is allocated £4,428. But that's £862 lower than for each city pupil in Leicester's schools.

In neighbouring Nottinghamshire, the funding gap is even greater. County pupils are allocated £4,746.

That's almost £1,000 less than pupils in Nottingham City.

"I'm not asking for any education authority to lose out," Councillor Ould told me.

"We've simply asked the government to narrow the range between the lowest funded and the average.

"Somebody has to be at the bottom of the funding table and I'm quite comfortable if that's Leicestershire, providing the current range between the best funded and the lowest is narrowed."

He's suggesting an increase of between 0.25% or 0.50% for each year of this parliament.

That could cost the Department for Education up to £100 million.

Finding the formula

Start Quote

We have schools in Loughborough that have needs too and it's time that was recognised”

End Quote Nicky Morgan MP Conservative, Loughborough

For a county like Leicestershire, that's worth an extra £1 million. The higher increase would net £4 million.

"The money's there," said Councillor Ould.

"If the Department for Education can find the cash for its pupil premium scheme and other projects, it can certainly afford this."

He's argues the current funding formula puts county schools at a financial disadvantage. And he's getting influential parliamentary backing.

"We have deprived areas in Leicestershire," said Nicky Morgan, the Conservative MP for Loughborough.

"Teachers' salaries and book costs are the same for our schools as they would be in any city. Our schools in Loughborough have needs too and it's time that was recognised," she added.

Tussle ahead?

But there's this warning about tampering with the current formula.

"There is a clear, clear need for extra money for cities like Leicester," said Labour's Councillor Vi Dempster, who runs schools and children's services for the city.

Start Quote

School

If there's any more money to be handed out, it should go to those authorities that have the most need”

End Quote Clr Vi Dempster Leicester City Council

She told Eleanor Garnier, BBC Radio Leicester's political reporter:

"If there's any more money to be handed out, it should go to those authorities that have the most need. And that means Leicester City and not Leicestershire County."

This hints at a new tussle between city and county for more government cash support for schools.

The county lobby feels it's winning its case.

Michael Gove is said to be supportive and agrees the current funding system needs an overhaul. But the issue now is timing.

The Education Secretary told Ivan Ould a long term solution would have to wait until after the next general election... unless Ivan had a cunning plan that adds up.

That Ould alternative is now on its way to the Department for Education.

 
John Hess Article written by John Hess John Hess Political editor, East Midlands

New round of spending cuts "horrendous", warns top Tory

Police chiefs and council leaders are calling for help in the form of extra government grants as budget cuts bite.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 8.

    Money doesn't give you a good education. grove proves that effortlessly.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 7.

    With recent reports showing 22% of UK kids leave school innumerate and 17% leave illiterate, perhaps Michael Gove should be asking for a refund instead.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 6.

    Why does location matter for pupil funding but not matter for teacher pay?

    One of these systems is wrong.

    If pupils need more or less money based on where they live, then surely the same applies for teacher pay as well.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 5.

    The funding model for schools is outdated, unfair; the original reasons for variances long forgotten. A bit like the entire public sector funding systems. A re-evaluation across the board is in order.. Dear me has he spoken to GO Top down pots are not going to cut it.. The range of unfunded reforms being prosed in education beggar belief

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 4.

    Anything that would simplify the system would help. But if the government is thinking of adopting the volutary aided school model used by faith schools for academies will he also be expecting state school / non faith parents to make 'voluntary' contributions to the cost of their children's education? Or will he be picking up that tab?

 

Comments 5 of 8

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.