Campaigners welcome debate on assisted dying

Tony Nicklinson Tony Nicklinson played rugby for Cranbrook in Kent before he was paralysed

Tony Nicklinson, who is paralysed and has locked in syndrome, can't speak and communicates through his wife. Jane.

Just over two weeks ago a High Court judge ruled that he should be allowed to proceed with his "right-to-die" case.

The former Kent-based Cranbrook rugby player, has been paralysed since suffering a stroke seven years ago.

Currently if he's helped to die, those who assist him could be charged with murder.

His wife says it's time politicians addressed the issue and welcomes today's debate.

Assisted suicide

Start Quote

Jane Nicklinson

The debate today in the House of Commons is definitely a step in the right direction - albeit a very small step”

End Quote Jane Nicklinson

Jane Nicklinson says: "The debate today in the House of Commons is definitely a step in the right direction - albeit a very small step.

"It's nothing like what we're after but any debate is good debate for us."

It was a backbench debate so will have no effect on government policy but was significant because it was the first full assisted suicide debate on the floor of the chamber since 1970.

It comes after the Director of Public Prosecutions published new guidelines, which said any decision about whether to prosecute someone should take account of their motivation and whether they stood to gain financially.

Some MPs are calling for the guidelines to become enshrined in law.

The Green Party leader and Brighton Pavilion MP, Caroline Lucas, says the new guidelines are important because:

"It's precisely the knowledge that they have control over when they are able to die that allows them to live more full and often for longer."

Vulnerable people

Start Quote

When people are ill they are vulnerable to influence by family, friends and particularly those providing care for them”

End Quote Baroness Finlay of Llandaff

But critics say people should be "very wary" of changing the law.

Baroness Finlay of Llandaff, who is Chairwoman of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Dying Well, says:

"When people are ill they are vulnerable to influence by family, friends and particularly those providing care for them.

"It is only too easy for them to be persuaded, either actively or passively, that they would be better off dead".

Campaigners say the debate is a positive move but the government has no current plans to change the law when it comes to assisted dying.

Louise Stewart, Political editor, South East Article written by Louise Stewart Louise Stewart Political editor, South East

South East's view on Scottish vote

BBC South East political editor Louise Stewart explores the links between the South East and Scotland ahead of their referendum.

Read full article


Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    It's about time this was debated, there is no reason to deny this option to people. It's their body and their choice-it's no-one elses business!

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    I am sure that if 99.9% of people put themselves in Tony's shoes they would argue Tony's points. The guy has got to be given the right to die. This is not humanity at it's worst, it is humanity at it's best.

  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    The discussion was helped by Eddie Mair`s no nonsense interview with the Nicklinson family on PM. He always gets it right and the family were equally impressive with their totally honest and direct responses. I hope Mr. Nicklinson has some success.

  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    We make inhumane judgements when others are in difficulty like Tony. He faces a daily torment and is of sound mind to know what he wants He has shown great courage in wanting to make a final contribution to others who find themselves in a similar position. Facilitating death as palliative care nurses do is a matter of degree not principle

    We turn away from healthy viable foetus being killed

  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    This is nothing short of sheer cruelty. What he is having to endure is the stuff of nightmares. He is suffering something which we can only imagine and to compound his suffering, he is having to watch his family go through this ordeal too. We would not let an animal go through this torment so why are we subjecting him and his family to it. This is a disgraceful and apalling judgement.


Comments 5 of 6


This entry is now closed for comments


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.