Richard Branson's government aviation capacity plea
Sir Richard is not opposed to an estuary airport in Kent but says capacity needs to be increased in the interim or the South East would lose out
The government is currently holding a consultation on the future of aviation policy. However, all three main political parties have ruled out the expansion of Heathrow by building a third runway.
Now Sir Richard Branson - a man who knows a bit about aviation - has added his voice to the growing chorus of business leaders calling for the government to act to tackle the lack of aviation capacity.
He doesn't pull his punches saying the government's aviation policy is a mess.
Sir Richard says the one thing holding back economic growth in the country was that decision by the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and Labour to rule out a third runway at Heathrow.
He says because of that, his company, Virgin Atlantic, has had to expand abroad in the Australian and US markets instead.
Sir Richard adds he would be willing to put his money where his mouth is and invest £5bn to create thousands of jobs if Heathrow were to get the go-ahead for expansion.
He says he's speaking out because he thinks the politicians have ruled out a third runway at Heathrow for political reasons.
But he says sometimes brave people change their minds and it's clear that's what he thinks the government should do now.
The Department for Transport has said that it will continue to explore all options for maintaining the UK's aviation hub status with the exception of a third runway at Heathrow.
The aviation review is due to be published at the end of March.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~35~RS~)




Syria army 'storms' rebel-held town
Patience of Job
Tweets of the week
Clocking out
'It comes rumbling'
Art in the shadow of Hitler
The Culture Show
Comment number 1.
Globetrotter1018th March 2012 - 17:06
Having been the CEO of two international foreign airlines I can assure you that I personally would not have wanted to operate to any other airport in the South East except Heathrow. An airport in the Thames Estuary is not an attractive proposition for airlines or passengers. The Government needs to rethink their present disastrous airports policy that fails the British Economy.
Link to this (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
GeorgeCrozer18th March 2012 - 22:38
The Thames Estuary is wetland of Strategic environmental importance, it lies on one of the most important migratory routes in the northern hemisphere.
In 2003 government concluded after its consultation to build an airport at Cliffe (Thames Estuary) that the site was 12 times more likely to suffer bird strike than any other Major airport in the UK. For this reason alone its the wrong place!
Link to this (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
IR19th March 2012 - 9:31
The closure of Heathrow will spell a loss of 10,000's of jobs, perhaps more as well as property values in the areas west of London where businesses (and housing) have grown because of the proximity to heathrow, london and the motorway. This would have to be rebuilt around the estuary, but with cost and floodrisk, building all the supporting employment and housing and the airport will be difficult.
Link to this (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
IR19th March 2012 - 9:44
He mentions short term solutions - how about using the nearby RAF Northolt site (might be sold in MoD land clearance) for short-haul flights and investing in a shuttle/express light rail between there and Heathrow to open up long haul slots. Hong Kong airport offers an example with its direct connection to Shenzhen airport, allowing for inter-airport transfer whilst remaining on airside
Link to this (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
miss0miss19th March 2012 - 14:35
If air travel were an Olympic sport? its is like choosing between; Steam train or a Locomotive. Heathrow or a new modern island airport. I think that Sir Branson needs to indulge in a trip on the M4 & M25, it needs expanding before we can think about runway capacity, costs? The Island airport is opened in phases, so Heathrow would still be open for decades & ideally serve domestic daytime flights.
Link to this (Comment number 5)