Calls for a mood change on GM foods

GM protesters GM protesters undertook a high profile campaign over a decade ago

Thirteen years ago 28 supporters of Greenpeace broke into a field near Norwich and trashed the crop of genetically modified wheat.

It marked the start of a high profile campaign which forced the government to back down and brought an end to much of the research into the new technology.

Since then we've heard very little about the subject, but could all that be about to change?

This week the MP for Mid Norfolk, George Freeman, used a speech to a farming conference in Norfolk to call for a new debate into the benefits of GM.

"The public mood is changing," he told them.

"We need a grown-up debate about GM - we need to look at how we can unlock the power of that science to help the rest of the world.

"And we in government need to do more to support this important sector."

Food production

Start Quote

George Freeman MP

"GM is taking off around the world whether we like it or not. ”

End Quote George Freeman MP (Con) Mid Norfolk

Mr Freeman is a great supporter of new technologies and bio science.

He is a government advisor on life sciences and chair of the Science and Technology Select Committee, and he feels farming and local research is losing out.

"GM is taking off around the world whether we like it or not," he later told us.

"The choice is whether we are a bystander or whether we take part in it."

"At a time when the world is crying out for ways of growing more food, it would be negligent for us not to look at our science base in Norwich and Cambridge, and look at how we can grow food for the rest of the world.

"If we are going to increase food production then innovations like the blight resistant potato bred here in Norfolk and using traditional strains and varieties and gene traits, have a huge role to play."

Future crops

The Norfolk farming conference was dominated by talk about coping with the drought and the need to increase food production.

The conference was told that the world demand for food will have increased by 50% by 2030.

"We are not developing the crops we need for the future," said Peter Kendall, the President of the National Farmers' Union.

"We need to develop crops which will help us manage with less water and crops which don't need to be sprayed for insects.

"The resilience we need for the future will be delivered by smart plant breeding - and that's all GM is."

Genetically modified crops MP George Freeman has called for a grown-up debate on GM crops

The present government is more pro-GM than the previous one but even though it is not the issue it used to be, we understand that there is still some reluctance within Downing Street to give the go ahead to the full scale use of GM.

Advisors still fear the public reaction.

"I think there are still a lot of people who say, 'We do not want GM food, it's bad for our environment and it's potentially dangerous'," says Rupert Read, the leader of the Green Party in the Eastern Region.

"What worries us is that GM is not about feeding the world, it's about making money for a few big corporations.

"British farmers would be in a much better situation if there was more research into organic farming or into how to make small scale farming more successful."

Mr Freeman says he isn't forcing GM on people who don't want it, he just wants there to be a choice for those who do.

And he admits there is still a long way to go to win over public opinion, but he and other MPs believe the tide is turning.

Deborah McGurran Article written by Deborah McGurran Deborah McGurran Political editor, East of England

Neil Kinnock in Norwich gives as good as he gets

Lord Kinnock goes walkabout on the streets of Norwich and shows his skills as a veteran campaigner in a "critical" area.

Read full article


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    GM food is a dangerous experiment. Once it escapes into the wild and our food chain, it is an experiment that cannot be undone. We all thought that smoking had no health effects, and that asbestos was safe. Sometimes, we get it wrong. Splicing genes from one organism into another, and then eating the resultant food.... this is not a risk worth taking.

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    GM has not increased the food production one little bit. It can't, because the yield of a seed is dependent on a complex of genetic factors, unlike immunity for a certain pesticide. So it will never do what Monsanto and others promise. It will just give control over our food chain to those mega corporations. Which is what they want, of course.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    The people who protested 13 years ago were right then and nothing has changed. To understand this issue see the DVD Future of Food. Spelman who is in charge of agriculture is a creature of GM and will benfit from it being introduced. Just about everyone esle will lose. Do not let what happened to the banks happen to food. The idea that life can be patented should be thown out.



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.