New figures cast doubts on effectiveness of hunting ban

 
Huntsman New figures raise fresh doubts over the effectiveness of the hunting ban

Figures obtained by BBC One's Sunday Politics programme in the Midlands reveal the number of prosecutions brought under the Hunting Act in our part of the country since it came into force in 2005.

Just one!

Our Freedom of Information request to the Crown Prosecution Service also reveals that the case in question involved not fox hunting, but hare coursing, in Warwickshire, six years ago.

The penalty imposed in this case is not clear, but breaches of the law can lead to a fine of up to £5,000 and the possible forfeiture of any dogs or vehicles involved in the offence.

Blair's biggest regret

Our findings are bound to cast fresh doubts on the effectiveness of a ban introduced only after an epic of public and Parliamentary angst during the early years of the Blair government.

After leaving office, the former Prime Minister wrote in his autobiography, The Journey, that the ban had been his biggest regret.

A hunt A traditional hunt in the days before the hunting ban came into operation

Far from putting a stop to this traditional country pursuit (sic), latest figures from the Countryside Alliance suggest more people are riding to hounds than before the ban on chasing down the fox came in!

But the League Against Cruel Sports tell us it still has public opinion on its side.

It commissioned an IPSOS-MORI poll in 2010 in which 76% of their 2,000 respondents supported the ban on fox hunting remaining in force, 18% wanted it repealed, with 6% undecided.

So what now for the government's pledge, enshrined in the Coalition Agreement, to allow MPs a free vote on the repeal of the Hunting Act before the next election?

The Masters of the Warwickshire Hunt tell us they are not expecting Parliament to reopen the question in the near future.

Some MPs believe the electorate would be unimpressed if undue Parliamentary time were devoted to this during a period when the House has more pressing challenges to contend with.

Other priorities?

The Conservative MP for Stratford-on-Avon, Nadhim Zahawi, told us:

"I would like us to get the economy back on an even keel, make sure that we've delivered the reforms that the country really cares about.

Start Quote

Nadhim Zahawi MP

For us to prioritise something that clearly isn't at the top of people's priorities would be completely wrong”

End Quote Nadhim Zahawi MP (Cons)

"For us to prioritise something that clearly isn't at the top of people's priorities would be completely wrong."

I'd love to know your thoughts about this - not so much the well-rehearsed pros and cons of hunting itself as the question whether or not it would be a good or bad use of Parliamentary time?

Go to the comments section below to let me know if you agree with what appears to be majority public opinion.

Or do you think it is a bad law and as such needs to be expunged from the statute book as a matter of urgency?

And I hope you will watch our debate during this week's Sunday Politics from 12.00 on BBC One on Sunday, 12 February 2012.

Remember to follow me on Twitter: PatrickBurnsBBC

 
Patrick Burns Article written by Patrick Burns Patrick Burns Political editor, Midlands

West Midlands councils braced for funding cuts

As councils learn how much money they will have next year to spend on local services, Patrick Burns looks at the situation in the West Midlands.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +11

    Comment number 2.

    The Hunting Act needs all the loopholes closed, strengthening, and enforcing, not repealing. Many of these people are getting away with illegal hunting day after day in the hunting season because they know they can. It is a cruel and unnecessary pastime - it cannot possibly be called a sport - and it's time these criminals were brought to book like other law breakers

  • rate this
    +10

    Comment number 3.

    I agree with AuntiCon....it might be unworkable in it's current form but that does not mean that the whole idea of banning something as outdated and cruel as Hunting is wrong or that the Act should be repealed. Not when almost 80% of the population want a ban !
    On the contrary, it requires strengthening and proper enforcing.

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 5.

    It's called democracy where the will of the majority, should in the main be reeflected in our laws.
    I and many others, including farmers who oppose hunting live in rural areas and know exactly what goes on and are against it for that very reason, so please dont use ignorance as your explanation of any opposition you face. !

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 7.

    Why should fox hunting be exempt from laws we have re animal welfare,its a case of certain people thinking they are above the law, those who carry out this activity are hard pressed to come up with any justification for hunting foxes so out come the same sad exuses, like keeping the fox numbers down etc etc.
    luv the violent hunt supporters, tho what a sad bunch they are.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 9.

    This law should be strenghtened, all loop holes closed and then a permanent ban put in place. Blood sports belong in the dark ages, along with those who participate in this cruel vile 'sport'. They have total disregard for the law, and no compassion for our wild life. They class the fox as vermin, whereas they are the real vermin.

 

Comments 5 of 35

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.