Public sector pay bargaining could affect millions

 
Man with money Local public sector workers in England could be paid less in the north than the south

It seemed like an afterthought in the Autumn Statement.

But when George Osborne raised the issue of local public sector pay bargaining, he must have known he was proposing something which could have a huge effect on millions of workers.

At the moment, public sector wages are all negotiated on a national basis.

Workers do get an extra allowance if they are in London, but a public sector worker is largely paid the same rate whether they're in Hastings, Harrogate or Hartlepool.

The Chancellor wants to investigate whether that should change and has asked the pay review bodies to tell him how more local pay bargaining might work.

That could see the likes of nurses, teachers, council workers and prison officers paid different rates in different parts of the country.

In particular, public sector workers in England could be paid less in the north than the south.

Saving money?

Of course, this looks like another potential deficit cutting measure.

But the government insists its interest in local pay bargaining has nothing to do with saving money, and everything to do with boosting the economy.

It believes relatively high public sector pay rates in some parts of the country are actually damaging the private sector in those areas.

Nurses Nurses are one of the groups of workers which could be affected by local public sector pay bargaining

The Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that public sector workers earn less than private sector staff in London.

But the IFS says in the north of England men in the public sector earn about 7% more than those in the private sector.

The government says that is making it hard for the private sector to recruit staff as it can't match those pay rates.

That then "crowds out" private sector employment, making it harder for companies to grow and entrenching the north's dependence on the public sector.

So the theory is, lower public sector pay rates in the north could actually lead to a boost in employment and economic activity.

Union reaction

You won't be surprised to know that this is not a message which has gone down well with the trade unions.

The Northern TUC does not see why a nurse in Stockton should be paid less than a nurse in Surrey.

Start Quote

Phil Wilson MP

The answer to the problem is not regional pay or localised pay - it is a living wage for all our people”

End Quote Phil Wilson MP, Sedgefield (Lab)

And it says instead of boosting the northern economy, it will further depress it, by cutting household incomes and reducing spending power.

It's an issue which has now reached the Commons, and the North East's Labour MPs have plenty to say.

In a debate on the issue, Bishop Auckland's Helen Goodman estimated it could take £500m to £1bn out of the regional economy by effectively imposing an average £2,000 pay cut on public sector workers.

And Sedgefield's Phil Wilson said even an extended pay freeze for the north's public sector staff would be unfair.

He said: "I do not want public sector workers in North East England to have to face extended periods of austerity because they happen to be working in the wrong part of the country.

"We need to look at the private sector. I want private sector jobs to come to the North East of England, and I want those private sector jobs to have good pay rates.

"The answer to the problem is not regional pay or localised pay - it is a living wage for all our people."

'Potentially damaging'

But the government is unapologetic.

Treasury Minister Chloe Smith said: "Private sector pay is more subject to the rates paid by local competitors, the local cost of living and perhaps, in some cases, local turnover rates.

Start Quote

Chloe Smith

Public sector workers can often be paid more than private sector workers in similar jobs in the same area - that has potentially damaging consequences for the economy”

End Quote Chloe Smith Treasury Minister

"However, public sector pay is usually set on a one-size-fits-all basis nationally.

"Accordingly, public sector workers can often be paid more than private sector workers in similar jobs in the same area. That has potentially damaging consequences for the economy."

At the moment though the government insists there are no concrete proposals.

It says that it will wait for the pay review bodies to report back in July before deciding what to do next.

It has, though, decided not to include doctors and dentists in the pay review because of fears they could all head south if local pay rates were imposed.

The police have also been excluded from the review.

But that still leaves an awful lot of public sector workers waiting to find out whether they will face another battle with the government.

Sunday Politics will be examining the issue with North East businesses, union officials and MPs on BBC1 at 12:00 GMT on Sunday 15 January,

 
Richard Moss Article written by Richard Moss Richard Moss Political editor, North East & Cumbria

Northern Tories look to party for devolution answers

Conservatives in northern England say the region must not be left unfairly disadvantaged by further Scottish devolution

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 32.

    This is not about balancing the economy. Its not even about making further cuts. Its about divide and rule among the public sector workers, something this Tory led government excels in- the Tories have been doing this since Thatcher.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 31.

    5 questions for proponents of this penny-pinching wheeze. Will MPs be paid according to which part of the UK they represent? Will our Armed Forces' pay reflect which base they happen to be stationed at? How local will local pay bargaining be? What jobs will be regarded as comparable? Will any adjustment be made to comparative private sector income to reflect tax avoidance or evasion?

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 30.

    Does this effectively mean that MP's will also be paid less in accordance with their geographical location, or will they somehow be exempt?

    I wonder.............

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 29.

    Polly, you come across as being as bright as a one watt bulb in the Albert Hall I cannot recall anybody during the 1970s, 1980s or 1990s leaving the private sector behind to come and take advantage of the generous civil service pension scheme, taking into account the relatively low pay that civil servants enjoyed. You can't have it both ways.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 28.

    Public sector workers have not had a pay rise for years.people in general live according to the wage they take home and im sure if bosses in the private sector suddenly said we are cutting your pay by 2000 pa you would all complain. the b all and end all is that with the rise in living costs no one can afford to work for less.and i didnt know that Gas Electricity water was any cheaper in the north

 

Comments 5 of 32

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.