Last minute bid to beat solar panel tariff deadline
The late rush to install solar panels follows the government's decision to slash the subsidy available
An eleventh-hour rush to install solar panels has been taking place, as householders try to beat the deadline to benefit from a greater financial incentive to produce their own electricity.
The last minute boom follows the government's decision to slash the subsidy available to those who generate their own solar power.
From December 12, the feed-in tariff for residents who install solar panels will be reduced from 43p for each kilowatt-hour generated to 21p per kWh.
The timing of the move has been criticised by environmental campaigners and the green energy industry, with claims the decision will cost thousands of jobs.
No warning?“Start Quote
End Quote Robert Borrill Poultry farmerWe've paid the money, we've signed the contract and out of the blue a decision like this comes through to cut the tariff now”
Poultry farmer Robert Borrill took out a £150,000 loan to install solar panels on his farm in North Lincolnshire.
He signed the contract and paid for planning permission, but was told he would not be eligible for the higher tariff due to the reduction, which many did not expect until 2012.
Speaking to the Politics Show in Yorkshire and Lincolnshire, Mr Borrill said: I am absolutely livid. All the warning signs were that the tariff would change next April, which would have given us time to prepare.
"We've paid the money, we've signed the contract and out of the blue a decision like this comes through to cut the tariff now."
Solar subsidyMinisters claim the feed-in tariff was simply unaffordable at the previous level and argue the cost of photovoltaic panels have fallen since the scheme was launched.
The amount of solar power generated by the domestic market has increased more than ten-fold since the subsidy
The solar subsidy scheme, worth £867m, is funded by a charge on consumer energy bills.
In November, two of Britain's biggest solar panel installers and the environmental campaign group Friends of the Earth launched a High Court bid to prevent the tariffs being cut by the government.
Figures released by the energy regulator Ofgem reveal the amount of solar power generated by the domestic market has increased more than ten-fold since the subsidy began in 2010.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~01~RS~)




US Taliban move prompts Afghan ire
Jumpstarting Motor City
Baby on board
Warning from history
Coming out in Yemen
Transport in transit
Fast Track
Comment number 1.
Robmwright8th December 2011 - 17:31
The drastic cut to FiT was a terrible move by the government. Terrible for users such as Mr Borrill, terrible for the environment, terrible for the installation workforce (Carillion have placed 4500 staff at risk of redundancy).
Link to this (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
RSGMK8th December 2011 - 17:47
Bad planning by DECC and wavering commitment to green issues by Messrs Barker and Huhne have lead to this problem. I urge Robert Borill and all those with an interest to comment on the consultation via the DECC website. RB should also ask the NFU for their support. Perhaps if there are enough complaints there will be a re-think.
Link to this (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
Chris and Chantal9th December 2011 - 12:50
We were scheduled to have our solar panels but in spite of having paid the deposit we cancelled the whole thing as we did not trust the government not to change their mind again in the future. The oldest of us is 71. What chance did we have to get any return? We cannot blame the "people" for not trying to be "green". We try but are prevented by such measures that are "under the belt"
Link to this (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
James9th December 2011 - 15:08
The government say the reason that caused this change in the FIT to be necessary is that solar panel prices have fallen by 30% since April 2010, causing a greater than expected rise in demand. They have constantly updated installation figures - why did they make a change with no notice?
This infographic is of changes made in the FIT: http://www.talksolarpanels.co.uk/fit-solar-panels-changes.php
Link to this (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
Tony Gillam12th December 2011 - 8:47
A reduction in FIT to reflect decreasing installation costs is OK but they've not reduced by 50% ( the the subsidy figure). They admit panel costs have reduced 30% but install costs will have changed little.
The speed with which this measure has been introduced, leaving only six weeks to complete existing projects, and before the end of the consultion period indicates dishonesty.
Link to this (Comment number 5)
Comments 5 of 9