High speed rail plans condemned as high cost option

 
Andrea Leadsom MP, Conservative, South Northamptonshire Andrea Leadsom MP believes there are still big questions about High Speed 2

Related Stories

There's a significant risk that High Speed 2 will become the latest in a long series of government big project disasters. So says the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) in their new report that Andrea Leadsom MP has helped launch.

"The case simply does not make economic sense," she told the well attended launch meeting. "The more I get to know about it, the more against it I am."

She conjectured that most MPs had spent "less than 10 minutes" considering the plans that, at a stupendous £30bn, would cost every tax payer £1,000 each.

The consultation period for High Speed 2 (HS2) finishes at the end of the month. Many in the room believe the plans should not simply go through on the nod.

Huge investment

"It is simply not good enough to 'suck it and see'. One of the key issues for parliament is to focus on this huge investment - £30bn," the Conservative MP for South Northamptonshire said.

"The cost is key. The money could be spent on the north in another way."

Iain Stewart, the Conservative MP for Milton Keynes South and a member of the Transport Select Committee, also sounded a note of caution.

"It's not just about putting a high speed line in. The key is how it is connected to the existing network."

He said it was a very helpful report and added: "I will not support this if it does not deliver extra capacity and services and it must be affordable."

Labour's Geoffrey Robinson (Coventry North West) was somewhat more succinct.

Arguments against High Speed 2

  • Government subsidies on rail fares distort prices and demand
  • Cost of HS2 is £1,000 per tax payer
  • Environmental and social costs not assessed
  • Long term planning blight
  • Green credentials of scheme questionable

"This is a god-awful waste of national resources. The worst I've ever seen in parliament," he said.

Andrea Leadsom wound up: "The argument that it will free up capacity on classic lines is not necessarily the case. With increased freight and fewer stops we could end up with worse local services.

"There are big questions that still need to be answered. Is the price of HS2 justifiable?"

That argument has a long way to go.

 
Deborah McGurran, Political editor, East of England Article written by Deborah McGurran Deborah McGurran Political editor, East of England

High noon for UKIP in Clacton

As he stood outside McDonalds in the centre of Clacton, the UKIP leader Nigel Farage was clear about the importance of the forthcoming by-election.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 2.

    Sorry - what do MP's have a clue about transport infrastructure in this country.?
    They are all a bit clueless really, but we should take the £30bn an renationalise the railways - that would bring about an instant improvement.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 1.

    Has all the prestige project smell of Concorde about it.
    Lots of jobs and money for something that will have to be given away because it doesn't make economic sense.
    Similar to Concorde nice for the privileged few that would be travelling on it at taxpayers' expense.
    Let's have all the risk laid on private investors. Not a penny of our money.

 
 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.