Fire control fiasco 'an extraordinary failure'

 
Richard Bacon MP South Norfolk Conservative MP Richard Bacon said £649m could have been spent much better locally

Related Stories

There are a lot of questions that need to be answered over the aborted Firecontrol project.

This week MPs made the first stab at trying to get to the bottom of the fiasco.

The chief civil servant at the Department for Communities and Local Government, Sir Bob Kerslake, appeared before the Public Accounts Committee.

He had a torrid time.

Delays and costs

Firecontrol was devised by Labour back in 2004. The aim was to create a centralised fire and rescue control system. County fire control rooms would go and, instead, all 999 calls would be handled by one big centre.

In the eastern counties that centre was going to be at Waterbeach in Cambridgeshire where £23m was spent on a new building which now stands empty.

The coalition government scrapped the project last year because of constant delays and the growing expense of the scheme.

Start Quote

This is an extraordinary failure of leadership which has cost the tax payer nearly £3/4bn”

End Quote Richard Bacon MP Member of the Public Accounts Commiittee

Last week the National Audit Office (NAO) concluded that £469m had been wasted on the project, blaming the lack of consistent leadership and ineffective governance.

The Public Accounts Committee believed the final cost of the project could be as high as £649m and was looking for someone to blame.

"This is an extraordinary failure of leadership which has cost the taxpayer nearly £3/4bn," fumed the South Norfolk MP Richard Bacon.

Sir Bob admitted that the project had been "very ambitious and complex".

He told the committee that ministers were concerned that fire services across the country had different technical systems and were worried about their resilience in the event of a major emergency.

That was the thinking behind Firecontrol.

Expensive reorganisation

Sir Bob said it was realised that re-organising the fire service would be expensive but "officials were of the view that the benefits of the scheme outweighed the cost".

He told the committee that there were flaws with the IT system and "insufficient analysis of the overall costs and risks of the project".

Matthew Hancock (Con, West Suffolk) worked out that with a total of 1,400 control staff working across the country the failed project had cost £400,000 per controller.

"All this just to get them to talk to each other," he exclaimed. "Wouldn't it have been better to buy them all mobile phones?"

Start Quote

If this was the private sector heads would roll”

End Quote Stephen Barclay MP Member of the Public Accounts Committee

He told Sir Bob that the fire and rescue service in Suffolk was having to make cuts to its service while at the same time the government was having to write off £649m on the wasted project.

Steven Barclay (Con, Cambs North East) seized on the revelation that £68.6m had been spent on consultants. "Has anyone lost their job as a result of this programme going wrong?" he asked.

"No," replied Sir Bob.

"If this was the private sector heads would roll," Mr Barclay responded.

'Lions led by donkeys'

Mr Bacon said one of the major faults was the project was drawn up with very little consultation with the local fire and rescue services.

"It was lions led by donkeys. £649m could have been spent much better locally."

The committee was told that the regional control centres, including the one at Waterbeach, are on a 25 year lease, owned by the developers.

The government hopes a use can be found for them but at the moment there are no plans for the Waterbeach building.

Sir Bob told the committee that he was "sitting here taking responsibility" for the project's failure.

Mr Bacon was not impressed. "It's just an uncomfortable couple of hours for you," he replied.

You can expect his committee's report to be very damning.

 
Deborah McGurran, Political editor, East of England Article written by Deborah McGurran Deborah McGurran Political editor, East of England

Incinerator plan bites the dust localisation->translate("watch"); ?>

Controversial plans for an incinerator in King's Lynn have been effectively scrapped leaving the council tax payer with a bill for £30m.

Watch Deborah's report

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 2.

    I hate to say 'We told you so', but......we told you so and in great detail as well as to why this would not work. As an eternal optimist I live in the hope that one day, politicians will stop listening to their own egos and listen to the people that actually do the job (and in this I'm referring to a great many professions within the public sector). We could have saved them countless £millions.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1.

    The costs are not ended - the FC buildings are costing taxpayers money just to keep mothballed. This is yet another huge government IT/centralisation project that has spectacularly failed. Even the ones that are up and running are a challenge to use (step forward and take a bow Student Finance). Perhaps the NAO could get more involved *before* money is wasted in future?

 
 

Features

  • The OfficeIn pictures

    Fifty landmark shows from 50 years of BBC Two


  • French luxury Tea House, Mariage Freres display of tea pots Tea for tu

    France falls back in love with tea - but don't expect a British cuppa


  • Worcestershire flagFlying the flag

    Preserving the identities of England's counties


  • Female model's bottom in leopard skin trousers as she walks up the catwalkBum deal

    Why budget buttock ops can be bad for your health


  • Two women in  JohanesburgYour pictures

    Readers' photos on the theme of South Africa


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.