Who are the UK's foreign workers?

 
Arrivals board at Heathrow airport

On New Year's Day, construction worker Victor Spiresau was greeted by politicians, reporters and photographers at Luton Airport - the first Romanian immigrant to arrive in Britain after the controversial lifting of employment controls on Romania and Bulgaria.

Victor became the reluctant symbol of what many predicted would be a vast wave of East Europeans flocking to the UK.

MPs and newspapers warned of a "flood" of hundreds of thousands of poor Romanians and Bulgarians who would strain our welfare system and public services. It was an argument that played directly into anxieties about immigration and the influence of the EU.

But today's figures, the first official estimate of workers from Romania and Bulgaria since the transitional employment restrictions were removed on the so-called A2 countries in January, suggest there has been no flood. If anything, the reverse.

There were an estimated 144,000 Romanian and Bulgarian workers in the UK at the end of 2013. Now the respected Labour Force Survey puts the figure at 140,000 at the end of March - 4,000 fewer people from A2 countries estimated to be working here since controls were lifted.

The figure is still 29,000 higher than the number estimated for the same period last year, but that rise occurred while employment restrictions were still in place. The argument that lifting them would lead to huge extra numbers coming here from Romania and Bulgaria is not reflected in official figures.

Start Quote

People will tend to move to places that offer better prospects, and within the European Union that freedom is enshrined in the EU Treaty”

End Quote

However, the numbers do demonstrate a long-term rise in workers from the A2 countries coming to the UK. Back in 2001, the Labour Force Survey estimated there were only around 6,000 citizens from those countries employed in Britain.

Numbers grew steadily as the former communist states developed closer relationships with the West, and after they were invited to join the European Union in 2007, 100,000 more Romanian and Bulgarian workers came in just six years, despite "transitional" employment controls.

But today's figures are a reflection of a wider phenomenon. There has been a significant increase in the number of workers from many other EU countries coming to Britain in recent months, notably the A8 countries including Poland, the Czech Republic and Latvia.

The first three months of this year saw a jump of 74,000 in the number of workers from those eight accession countries compared with the last quarter of 2013. Year-on-year, the increase is 115,000 - one of the highest increases seen since Poles first started coming to the UK in large numbers in 2004.

Overall, the number of workers from elsewhere in the EU has risen 168,000 in the past year - mobile labour attracted by the impressive employment situation in the UK.

Here, of course, is the real issue. People will tend to move to places that offer better prospects, and within the European Union that freedom is enshrined in the EU Treaty.

Theresa may Home secretary, Theresa May: UK "committed to freedom of movement."

"Freedom of movement in Europe is one of the central achievements of the European integration process and one of the most important and visible benefits of the European Union for its citizens," the Home Secretary Theresa May stated in a letter last year. "We are fully committed to the common European right to the freedom of movement. We will always welcome Union citizens who move to another EU country to work."

However, the UK is not alone in questioning the impact this freedom can have on welfare and public services, particularly for a country that outperforms other parts of the EU economically. The government is tightening up access to some benefits for EU citizens where permissible, and looking to renegotiate the rules still further.

The letter signed by Mrs May was sent to the President of the European Council for Justice and Home Affairs jointly with representatives from Austria, Germany and the Netherlands.

Among richer and more economically stable countries within the EU, there is a shared concern that positive headlines about financial success are matched by troublesome headlines about immigration.

Today's Labour Force Survey figures show that the UK's employment rate has risen to probably its highest ever level among domestic workers - 72.8%, marginally higher than the figure for non-UK citizens (69.5%).

While the number of foreign-born citizens working here has risen 178,000 in the past year, the number of UK citizens in employment is up 563,000. A remarkable 400,000 fewer people are claiming unemployment benefits in the UK compared with a year ago - a massive 26.4% drop.

It is impressive numbers like these that explain why workers in many other EU countries think Britain might be a good place to look for a job.

 
Mark Easton Article written by Mark Easton Mark Easton Home editor

We need Miss Marple

Is it so crazy to suggest that someone looks to see if their neighbour's stolen vase is offered for sale at the local car boot?

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 527.

    PS @526

    Whether by 'losing' in trade wars, or by unwittingly and unhappily attracting cheap labour, en masse, boosting remittances to historical victim-cultures, a very crude equilibration of global shares is in progress, unfortunately with as yet no learning of lessons here or abroad from the great harms in previous iterations, our chance passing if not passed to lead the way on REAL democracy.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 526.

    @522. JasonEssex " . . . around 8bil was remited by Western Union alone last year from the UK to Poland by polish living here . . . "

    And while they were earning that money, were they living on thin air? When it comes to shifting money out of the country, I suspect money sent home by immigrants (on which tax has probably been paid) pales into insignificance compared to off-shore tax evasion.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 525.

    523JE:

    You are right to ask what makes people pro or anti EU.

    In my case it's because I've taken the time to research properly the effects of EU rules on: H&S at work, including rest time; the environment; food, medicine and agrichem safety; trading standards; ECHR-implicit private property protection; and general freedom e.g to retire, study or work elsewhere. These apply to all, rich or poor.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 524.

    The BBC seems to me to have done its bit, to help the tabloids, in stoking the anti-Bulgarian/Polish/Romanian frenzy, and would no doubt (of course) be HORRIFIED at the merest suggestion of racism. But why no word from them, on the effects on job prospects for the British, of the many white S. hemisphere people here, e.g. as lifeguards, surf instructors and bar staff?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 523.

    I wonder how many people who are pro-eu either:-
    1. Work for them
    2. Are wealthy
    3. Own a business
    Anti-eu and see the effect on
    1. housing
    2. public services
    3. wages
    4. jobs

 

Comments 5 of 527

 

Features

  • Two sphinxes guarding the entrance to the tombTomb mystery

    Secrets of ancient burial site keep Greeks guessing


  • The chequeBig gamble

    How does it feel to bet £900,000 on the Scottish referendum?


  • Tattooed person using tabletRogue ink

    People who lost their jobs because of their tattoos


  • Deepika PadukoneBeauty and a tweet

    Bollywood cleavage row shows India's 'crass' side


  • Relief sculpture of MithrasRoman puzzle

    How to put London's mysterious underground temple back together


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.