Welfare reform offers new hope, says David Cameron

General view of a Job Centre Archbishop Vincent Nichols said that the welfare state was becoming "more punitive"

Related Stories

The prime minister has rejected a claim by Archbishop of Westminster Vincent Nichols that government welfare reform is leaving people in "destitution".

David Cameron said he respected his view but disagreed with it "deeply", in an article for the Daily Telegraph.

Social reform was giving "new hope and new responsibility" to people, and was part of his "moral mission", he wrote.

Last weekend, the leader of the Catholic Church in England and Wales described the changes as a "disgrace".

Archbishop Nichols, who will be created a cardinal on Saturday, told the Telegraph that the welfare state was growing increasingly punitive as the system underwent its biggest shake-up for decades.

David Cameron David Cameron said some of the archbishop's criticism was "simply not true"

The government's welfare reforms include:

  • Introducing universal credit, which combines six means-tested benefits into a single payment
  • Capping the amount of benefits that working-age people can receive
  • Cutting benefits for social housing tenants with spare bedrooms, dubbed the "bedroom tax" by critics
  • Capping rises to most working-age benefits and tax credits at 1%, instead of their increasing in line with inflation
  • Replacing disability living allowance with the epersonal independence payment

Separately, the government has confirmed details of a further restriction on European migrants who apply for benefits in the UK.

From 1 March, they will have to demonstrate that they are earning at least £149 a week before they can access a range of benefits.

'New responsibilty'

Mr Cameron wrote in the Telegraph that the government's economic plan for Britain was "about doing what is right".

Start Quote

For me, the moral case for welfare reform is every bit as important as making the numbers add up”

End Quote David Cameron

He said: "Nowhere is that more true than in welfare. For me, the moral case for welfare reform is every bit as important as making the numbers add up."

The prime minister argued the archbishop's criticism that the "safety net" for the poorest families was being "torn apart" was "simply not true". Mr Cameron said that reform was right in principle and in practice.

He said the journey to turning the country's economic fate around required difficult decisions.

"But our welfare reforms go beyond that alone - they are about giving new purpose, new opportunity, new hope - and yes, new responsibility to people who had previously been written off with no chance," he added.

Mr Cameron continued: "Seeing these reforms through is at the heart of our long-term economic plan - and it is at the heart, too, of our social and moral mission in politics today."

Speaking later on a visit to South West Wales, the prime minister said the benefits system still provided a "safety net" to those who cannot work, but there had to be greater incentives to help people find employment.

Archbishop Nichols is the most senior Roman Catholic cleric in England and Wales and is one of 19 new cardinals globally who will be appointed by Pope Francis in the Vatican on Saturday.

'Fair system'

The archbishop told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Tuesday that something was "seriously wrong" with a welfare system that allowed poorer members of society to remain "in a destitute situation".

Politicians were facing a "moral challenge", he suggested, in living up to "the principle that we have to regard and treat every single person with respect".

Among the latest in a series of measures curbing migrants' access to benefits, ministers announced on Wednesday that EU nationals will have to demonstrate they have earned £149 a week for three months to qualify for "worker" status, opening the door to more generous benefit entitlements.

Labour said the government's handling of welfare had been a disaster, resulting in a sharp rise in the number of young unemployed people for more than a year and a tenfold increase in the use of food banks.

"This government's welfare reforms have penalised, rather than helped, those doing the right thing," said shadow work and pensions secretary Rachel Reeves.

"The idea that disabled people hit by the 'bedroom tax', young people desperate for a job but stuck on benefits, and working families struggling to survive on low pay have been given 'hope' by David Cameron is preposterous."

The religion think tank Theos said the debate on benefits needed to look beyond individual policies and consider the fundamental moral question of what "welfare is for".

Publishing a collection of essays by public figures on the subject, it said there was a consensus that individuals had a responsibility to each other, not just themselves.

But it said people need to be able to "connect what they put in to what they get out" of the welfare state and this link "has been lost over recent decades".


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites



This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 1103.

    Needing food is utter rubbish, as we can see in various images of food banks the luxury brands being givein out. They are eating better than those paying their way. Food is cheap, some are for ever complaining we get too many cals for too little, hence fat. Taking free food is just to free cash for luxuries. Like drink, tobacco, Sky, etc. Benefits are plentiful.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1090.

    A Benefits Review was overdue, but as usual, this government has broke its neck to roll out changes without adequately thinking it through! It is disgraceful to take the attitude that we'll sort stuff out as we go, these are people's lives we are talking about. There is an inadequate safety net for those with mental illness (often misunderstood). Result, a tragic loss of life due to suicides.

  • rate this

    Comment number 668.

    In my lifetime I have been unemployed for a total of 18 months due to redundancies. For the other 42 years I have kept myself employed. During the 18 months that I was unemployed I claimed no benefits.

    1. How did the government know that I was unemployed?
    2. How many people in the same position are not counted?
    3. What is the true number of unemployed?

    Just wondered!

  • rate this

    Comment number 601.

    Whether the bishop is right or not, there does seem to be a workhouse mentality to the Government's benefit reforms; the undeserving poor being largely classified as those not working (though not the only ones to suffer from them). It would seem most likely that the main reason for the reforms stem from the Government's desire to cut spending rather than to help those on benefits.

  • rate this

    Comment number 546.

    There should be no benefits for people in full time employment, and there should be proper benefits for the disabled. We should lower tax for people on low wages (why tax them at all?), and increase taxes for millionaires - 78% of MP's are millionaires.


Comments 5 of 10


More Politics stories



Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.