David Cameron dismisses Robert Gates' defence cuts warning


David Cameron said Robert Gates ''had got it wrong''

Related Stories

David Cameron has dismissed a warning from ex-US defence secretary Robert Gates that armed forces cuts would diminish the UK's military standing.

The prime minister said Britain has the world's fourth largest defence budget and was a "first class-player in terms of defence".

The UK plans to cut 30,000 armed forces personnel by 2020, leaving 147,000.

Mr Gates said the erosion in Britain's capabilities had reduced its ability to be a "full partner" to the US.

He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme the "fairly substantial reductions" in UK defence spending meant it "won't have full spectrum capabilities" - meaning the ability to fight on air, land and sea - that it had previously.

Mr Cameron, however, said Mr Gates was "wrong", adding that Britain was investing in its "future capabilities".

"We've got a massive investment programme of £160bn in our defence industries, in our equipment," he said.

"We are a first-class player in terms of defence and as long as I am prime minster that is the way it will stay."

The Ministry of Defence said the UK - like the US - had had to take "tough decisions" on defence spending but had "the best trained and best equipped armed forces outside the US".

Mr Gates, who served under presidents Obama and Bush, singled out cuts to the Royal Navy as particularly damaging and he noted that - for the first time since World War One - Britain did not have an operational aircraft carrier.


There have been many voices warning of the scale of this government's defence cuts. But it will be harder to ignore that of Robert Gates, a man who served two US presidents of very different political persuasions, and oversaw the wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

Not a man given to hyperbole, Mr Gates doesn't say the special relationship is dead. But he does believe that it's been fundamentally altered by the scale of Britain's defence cuts. He says without the "full spectrum" of military capabilities, Britain will not be able to be a "full partner". Given the unpopularity of the wars during his tenure, some may now be breathing a sigh of relief. But that's not true for senior politicians and military brass inside the MoD. They value being so close to the most powerful military nation on earth.

Mr Gates's intervention is unlikely to reverse the cuts. But his comments will still hurt, and wound pride. It will also fuel the debate as to Britain's place in the world.

Mr Gates warned against nuclear disarmament by the UK, but acknowledged that there was scope for changes to the way the deterrent was deployed.

Under the government's proposals, by 2020 the Army will lose 20,000 soldiers, the Royal Navy 6,000 personnel and the RAF 5,000 - although there are also plans to increase the number of reservists in each service.

Mr Gates's comments echo the concerns of senior military figures in the UK.

The Chief of the Defence Staff, General Sir Nicholas Houghton, warned last month Britain could be left with the "spectre" of a hollowed-out force.

Admiral Lord West, the former First Sea Lord, told the BBC the government had underestimated how important the government's relationship with the US was and had not factored that in when deciding on the cuts.

He also said the gap with no aircraft carrier, between scrapping the Ark Royal and the introduction of a new aircraft carrier in 2020, represented a "huge risk".

Lord Dannatt says US claims about UK military have 'ring of truth'

The former head of the British army, General Sir Richard Dannatt told BBC Two's Daily Politics programme: "Has the UK thought sufficiently at what its strategic interests are in the future? What is the quality of the relationship we want to have with the United States in the future and, dare I say it, with Europe?

"These are big issues and these are issues that have got to be confronted in the next defence review after the next election. What is Britain's ambition in the world?"

Former Defence Secretary Liam Fox defended Britain's defence policy, saying it was "one of only four or five countries inside Nato" to meet the target of spending 2% of GDP on defence.

However, Labour's shadow defence secretary Vernon Coaker said the prime minister should be worried about the concerns of "Britain's strongest ally".

"No-one is disputing the financial constraints within which the UK military must operate. But the government must ensure that Britain's defence capability is maintained."

The Chairman of the Defence Select Committee James Arbuthnott said Britain needed "to look again at how much we can spend on defence", and cited Gen Houghton's previous comments about how the UK could be left with a "hollowed-out force" as something that should worry the prime minister.

Meanwhile, Stop the War Coalition convenor Lindsey German said "many people in the country don't particularly like the special relationship with the US" and would not be concerned by Mr Gates's comments.

She said in times of austerity defence spending was the "wrong priority".

Changes in numbers of British military ships, submarines and aircraft between 1990 and present
Graphic showing cuts to Armed Forces: Army from 102,260 to 82,000 in 2020, Navy from 35,500 to 30,000 and the RAF from 40,130 to 35,000

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 29.

    "Mr Gates said the erosion in Britain's capabilities had reduced its ability to be a "full partner" to the US"

    Sounds good to me.Let them carry on alone with their warmongering.

  • rate this

    Comment number 54.

    Why do we insist on calling it the "Defence Budget"?

    Let's be honest here, in the last 50 years possibly 10% of this has been used on "Defence".

    The remaining 90% has gone on removing foreign powers who don't want to sell their country's resources on the cheap to us.

  • rate this

    Comment number 80.

    The 'special relationship' between UK/ is a sick joke!
    In every instance where UK Coroners Courts requested US witnesses on 'friendly fire' inquests, they refused point blank to turn up.
    Unfortunately the led to YEARS of delays before a Death Certificate could finally be issued to widows/families and meantime they had to live on meagre social security benefits and handouts.

  • rate this

    Comment number 43.

    Maybe Gates should think about cutting US military spending and use the money saved to help those in his own country living in dire poverty, instead of interfering in our affairs.

  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    I think the only thing stopping us from being a "full partner" is a growing resistance to pandering to the States' every desire.


Comments 5 of 726


More UK stories



  • Nigel Farage (left) and Douglas CarswellWho's next?

    The Tory MPs being tipped to follow Carswell to UKIP

  • A painting of the White House on fire by Tom FreemanFinders keepers

    The odd objects looted by the British from Washington in 1814

  • President Barack Obama pauses during a press conference on 28 August.'No strategy'

    Obama's gaffe on Islamic State reveals political truth

  • Chris and Regina Catrambone with their daughter Maria LuisaSOS

    The millionaires who rescue people at sea

  • Plane7 days quiz

    What unusual offence got a Frenchman thrown off a plane?

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.