Is diversity good or bad for community cohesion?

 
Notting Hill Carnival entertainers Entertainers at this year's Notting Hill Carnival

When I met the legendary American social scientist Robert Putnam a decade ago he took me aside and revealed, almost conspiratorially, that birds of a feather flock together.

The academic, who famously chronicled the decline of US social capital in his book Bowling Alone, was trying to explain research that in the short term at least, showed a negative correlation between diversity and community cohesion.

"In ethnically diverse neighbourhoods residents of all races tend to 'hunker down'," Putnam's study concluded. "Trust (even of one's own race) is lower, altruism and community cooperation rarer, friends fewer."

But now comes new academic research looking at London which turns this idea on its head.

Social cohesion in the capital, it concludes, is "significantly higher in more ethnically diverse neighbourhoods", once deprivation has been taken into account.

This is a startling assertion. The accepted wisdom among academics and policy makers, as the paper reminds readers, is that "ethnically diverse communities are characterized by distrust, low levels of social cohesion and disputes regarding the equitable provision of public goods".

Start Quote

London, despite its ethnic diversity, is among the least segregated parts of England”

End Quote

But diversity may not be the cause of social tension. "In fact, in the highly diverse neighbourhoods that characterise modern London, the opposite appears to be the case," the research finds.

Diversity emerges as a positive predictor of social cohesion, the paper asserts, a finding that runs counter to the large majority of published studies.

We need to unravel what is going on. As immigrants try to gain a toehold in their new land, they tend to live in poorer communities. We know that poverty is negatively associated with social cohesion.

It is also well understood that communities that are highly segregated tend to have much lower levels of trust. Think Beirut for example.

In order to understand the part diversity plays in the community life of a neighbourhood, you need to extract deprivation and segregation from the equation. And the research team did just that in what they suggest may be the most ethnically diverse conurbation on earth.

Mapping diversity and segregation
Diversity map of London Diversity map of London - diversity represented by darker areas
Segregation map of London Segregation map of London - segregated (dark) areas are few and far between...
Segregation map of England ... and a segregation map of England

"If living in an ethnically diverse neighbourhood causes people to distrust and avoid one another, then we should be certain to find evidence of the phenomenon in London," the researchers muse.

Using very detailed population data, what emerges is that London, despite its ethnic diversity, is among the least segregated parts of England. The one red slash across the yellow wash of the map looks to be where some of the poorest neighbourhoods in the East end rub up against the wealth of docklands and the city.

What the new research calculates is that ethnic diversity helps improve community life, "once adequate account is taken of the spatial distribution of immigrant groups within neighbourhoods and the degree of social and economic deprivation experienced by residents".

It turns out that the positive effect of diversity is strongest among younger people and weakest among the oldest people - actually becoming negative for people over 85. Segregation works the other way around - the impact of a more segregated community is most negative for young people while, for those over 65, segregation is a positive.

In many ways, the capital is a poor model for what happens in the rest of the UK. Professor Patrick Sturgis is director of the ESRC National Centre for Research Methods and the study's lead author. He accepts that London's unique immigrant and ethnic make-up "renders it sui generis" (one of a kind).

But what this paper suggests is that where you have non-segregated and relatively prosperous communities, diversity is likely to improve community life, not damage it.

 
Mark Easton Article written by Mark Easton Mark Easton Home editor

Whitehall v town hall

David Cameron promised to give local government more power, but local councils continue to shrink, relative to central government.

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -9

    Comment number 25.

    12 Rabbitkiller
    "One reason why the UK seems to have achieved so little in the past 30 years?"

    No, I'd say a bigger reason would be our tendancy to put the blame on Johnny Foreigner rather than looking at our own failings. Germany has a bigger foreign-born population than the UK, and they seem to be doing well.

  • rate this
    -6

    Comment number 28.

    26 PoliceStateUK

    Gay people exist.
    Women exist.
    Handicapped people exist.
    Elderly people exist.

    You can't ignore them all.

  • rate this
    -6

    Comment number 10.

    most non-uk born who arrive in this country (even the illegals) are the enterprising/educated elites from their countries - no wonder they make more comfortable neighbours than the deprived/illiterate uk underclass

  • rate this
    -5

    Comment number 68.

    Cultural diversity isn't an end in itself - it's a by-product of the movement of people. Genetic diversity is always a good thing. We should have a national language and a national identity (I regard myself as a left-wing fascist!) and actively promote them. Who cares what Britons look like, what they like to eat, what music makes them dance, as long as we all know what is and what is not cricket?

  • rate this
    -5

    Comment number 94.

    83. Richard Head
    Hmm. Another article on how marvellous multiculturalism is from the supposedly politically neutral BBC
    /////////
    Was multiculturalism invented by the BBC? i didn't know that, I thought it was a logical consequence of our colonial past. 1 thing Enoch conveniently omitted from his predictions.

 

Comments 5 of 119

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.