Benefit fraud could lead to 10-year jail terms, says DPP

 
Prison cell Suspects can now be charged under the Fraud Act, which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years

Related Stories

Benefit cheats in England and Wales could face longer jail terms of up to 10 years, following new guidance from the director of public prosecutions.

Keir Starmer QC said it was time for a "tough stance" given the £1.9bn annual cost of the crime to the nation.

He urged prosecutors to consider charging under the Fraud Act - rather than social security laws - because of the scope for longer sentences.

The prime minister's spokesman said he welcomed the move.

The BBC's legal correspondent Clive Coleman said the changes meant welfare cheating would now be classed alongside offences such as money laundering and banking fraud.

Cash limit

Benefit fraud statistics (2011)

  • 6,080 offenders were sentenced - the lowest number since 2001. (A total of 16,317 offenders were sentenced for all types of fraud in 2011)
  • 79% of cases were seen at the magistrates' court
  • 41% were given a community order, which means offenders serve their whole sentence in the community
  • 17% were fined
  • 16% were given an absolute or conditional discharge
  • Nearly 5% (291 offenders) were given immediate custody. The average sentence length was seven months, three weeks
  • 54% of offenders sentenced were female (compared with 26% for all fraud offences)

*Due to data classification, not all benefit fraud offences are included.

Source: Fraud Offences Sentencing Data (June 2013)

In the past, benefits cheats were commonly charged under social security legislation carrying a maximum sentence of seven years.

And benefit frauds of less than £20,000 were automatically tried in magistrates' courts, which could only sentence people to up to 12 months imprisonment for multiple offences. For a single offence, the maximum was six months.

This financial threshold has been scrapped under the new guidelines, so smaller cases can be referred straight to crown courts for tougher sentencing.

Suspects can also now be charged under the Fraud Act, which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years, according to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)

In 2012, the number of offenders jailed for benefit fraud was 262 and the average sentence length was six months and one week.

Stolen identity

Mr Starmer said: "It is a myth that 'getting one over on the system' is a victimless crime: the truth is we all pay the price. But it's not only the taxpayers that suffer.

"Benefits exist to protect and support the most vulnerable people in our society and, whenever the system is defrauded, it's also taking money away from those with a genuine need."

The DPP said prosecutors should consider a number of factors when deciding how to charge, including:

  • Whether the fraud was professionally planned
  • Whether multiple frauds occurred or a single fraud was carried out over a significant period of time
  • Whether a false or stolen identity was used
  • Whether the perpetrator abused a position of trust in order to commit the offence

The move comes after the CPS merged with the Department for Work and Pensions' prosecutions division last year.

The Independent's Owen Jones: "Paedophiles, rapists and murderers are going to have lesser sentences than people who commit benefit fraud"

Jonathan Isaby, political director of the TaxPayers' Alliance, welcomed it, saying: "This is people stealing from taxpayers - stealing from vulnerable people.

"A message needs to go out that this is unacceptable and increasing sentences will act as a deterrent."

But Labour MP Theresa Pearce, who is a member of the Commons' Work and Pensions Committee, accused Mr Starmer, who is due to stand down from his CPS role in October, of "trying to look tough" on benefit cheats.

"Ten years in prison, really? For something that could be like a couple of thousand pounds. Yes, that's bad and there's a way you should get it back but I just don't understand why this is his priority in his final months," she said.

Earlier this year, MPs on the Communities and Local Government Select Committee called on the government to give a "swift assurance" that the introduction of its new welfare system, known as universal credit, would not cause a rise in benefit fraud.

Universal credit will eventually replace six key means-tested benefits with one payment.

Last year, the CPS saw more than 8,600 prosecutions in benefit and tax credit cases, and 4,000 in the first five months of 2013, Mr Starmer said. The current conviction rate is 89.7%, he added.

The government says it has saved hundreds of millions of pounds by introducing better fraud prevention and reducing errors in the tax and benefit system.

A Downing Street spokesman said: "Benefit fraud is very serious. It's wrong and that's why the prime minister warmly welcomes this announcement."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 1546.

    The average person convicted of murder serves 14 years of their 'life' sentence. 10 years for benefit fraud, you'd serve less time for Rape - seems a bit odd to me.

  • rate this
    +20

    Comment number 901.

    The only real punishment is to prevent those found guilty to be prevented from claiming any future benefits for a fixed period of time or until the amount owed plus costs is repaid. Additionally, I would introduce a bounty for information leading to the convinction of someone committing benefit fraud.

  • rate this
    -11

    Comment number 873.

    If you break the law you deserve to get punished. 10 years will hopefully put people off doing it. This is not hitting those hardest off its hitting the people who take more than they need so they can buy extra houses and big tvs things they don't need to live.

  • rate this
    +23

    Comment number 870.

    Not sure prision for benefit fraud is the right way to go (unless, prehaps, for the organised crime version of it). Maybe the individual in question is put on a "benefits blacklist" and any future claiming is heavily monitored, a fine, which is taken from "souce"//i.e linked to any earnings/furutre earnings and community service i.e defraud 30K = 300 hours community work.

  • rate this
    +226

    Comment number 120.

    If only we could expect the same "tough stance" on tax evasion at the other end of the economic spectrum we might be in danger of having a fairer society.

 

Comments 5 of 7

 

More UK stories

RSS

Features

  • Peaky Blinders publicity shotBrum do

    Why is the Birmingham accent so difficult to mimic?


  • Oliver CromwellA brief history

    The 900 year story behind the creation of a UK parliament


  • Image of Ankor Wat using lidarJungle Atlantis

    How lasers have revealed an ancient city beneath the forest


  • TheatreBard taste? Watch

    Are trailer videos on social media spoiling theatre?


  • Agents with the US Secret Service, such as this one, are responsible for guarding the presidentHard at work

    White House break-in adds to Secret Service woes


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.